1====================== 2(Un)patching Callbacks 3====================== 4 5Livepatch (un)patch-callbacks provide a mechanism for livepatch modules 6to execute callback functions when a kernel object is (un)patched. They 7can be considered a "power feature" that extends livepatching abilities 8to include: 9 10 - Safe updates to global data 11 12 - "Patches" to init and probe functions 13 14 - Patching otherwise unpatchable code (i.e. assembly) 15 16In most cases, (un)patch callbacks will need to be used in conjunction 17with memory barriers and kernel synchronization primitives, like 18mutexes/spinlocks, or even stop_machine(), to avoid concurrency issues. 19 20Callbacks differ from existing kernel facilities: 21 22 - Module init/exit code doesn't run when disabling and re-enabling a 23 patch. 24 25 - A module notifier can't stop a to-be-patched module from loading. 26 27Callbacks are part of the klp_object structure and their implementation 28is specific to that klp_object. Other livepatch objects may or may not 29be patched, irrespective of the target klp_object's current state. 30 31Callbacks can be registered for the following livepatch actions: 32 33 * Pre-patch 34 - before a klp_object is patched 35 36 * Post-patch 37 - after a klp_object has been patched and is active 38 across all tasks 39 40 * Pre-unpatch 41 - before a klp_object is unpatched (ie, patched code is 42 active), used to clean up post-patch callback 43 resources 44 45 * Post-unpatch 46 - after a klp_object has been patched, all code has 47 been restored and no tasks are running patched code, 48 used to cleanup pre-patch callback resources 49 50Each callback is optional, omitting one does not preclude specifying any 51other. However, the livepatching core executes the handlers in 52symmetry: pre-patch callbacks have a post-unpatch counterpart and 53post-patch callbacks have a pre-unpatch counterpart. An unpatch 54callback will only be executed if its corresponding patch callback was 55executed. Typical use cases pair a patch handler that acquires and 56configures resources with an unpatch handler tears down and releases 57those same resources. 58 59A callback is only executed if its host klp_object is loaded. For 60in-kernel vmlinux targets, this means that callbacks will always execute 61when a livepatch is enabled/disabled. For patch target kernel modules, 62callbacks will only execute if the target module is loaded. When a 63module target is (un)loaded, its callbacks will execute only if the 64livepatch module is enabled. 65 66The pre-patch callback, if specified, is expected to return a status 67code (0 for success, -ERRNO on error). An error status code indicates 68to the livepatching core that patching of the current klp_object is not 69safe and to stop the current patching request. (When no pre-patch 70callback is provided, the transition is assumed to be safe.) If a 71pre-patch callback returns failure, the kernel's module loader will: 72 73 - Refuse to load a livepatch, if the livepatch is loaded after 74 targeted code. 75 76 or: 77 78 - Refuse to load a module, if the livepatch was already successfully 79 loaded. 80 81No post-patch, pre-unpatch, or post-unpatch callbacks will be executed 82for a given klp_object if the object failed to patch, due to a failed 83pre_patch callback or for any other reason. 84 85If a patch transition is reversed, no pre-unpatch handlers will be run 86(this follows the previously mentioned symmetry -- pre-unpatch callbacks 87will only occur if their corresponding post-patch callback executed). 88 89If the object did successfully patch, but the patch transition never 90started for some reason (e.g., if another object failed to patch), 91only the post-unpatch callback will be called. 92 93 94Example Use-cases 95================= 96 97Update global data 98------------------ 99 100A pre-patch callback can be useful to update a global variable. For 101example, 75ff39ccc1bd ("tcp: make challenge acks less predictable") 102changes a global sysctl, as well as patches the tcp_send_challenge_ack() 103function. 104 105In this case, if we're being super paranoid, it might make sense to 106patch the data *after* patching is complete with a post-patch callback, 107so that tcp_send_challenge_ack() could first be changed to read 108sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit with READ_ONCE. 109 110 111Support __init and probe function patches 112----------------------------------------- 113 114Although __init and probe functions are not directly livepatch-able, it 115may be possible to implement similar updates via pre/post-patch 116callbacks. 117 11848900cb6af42 ("virtio-net: drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST") change the way that 119virtnet_probe() initialized its driver's net_device features. A 120pre/post-patch callback could iterate over all such devices, making a 121similar change to their hw_features value. (Client functions of the 122value may need to be updated accordingly.) 123 124 125Other Examples 126============== 127 128Sample livepatch modules demonstrating the callback API can be found in 129samples/livepatch/ directory. These samples were modified for use in 130kselftests and can be found in the lib/livepatch directory. 131