1=============== 2Pathname lookup 3=============== 4 5This write-up is based on three articles published at lwn.net: 6 7- <https://lwn.net/Articles/649115/> Pathname lookup in Linux 8- <https://lwn.net/Articles/649729/> RCU-walk: faster pathname lookup in Linux 9- <https://lwn.net/Articles/650786/> A walk among the symlinks 10 11Written by Neil Brown with help from Al Viro and Jon Corbet. 12It has subsequently been updated to reflect changes in the kernel 13including: 14 15- per-directory parallel name lookup. 16- ``openat2()`` resolution restriction flags. 17 18Introduction to pathname lookup 19=============================== 20 21The most obvious aspect of pathname lookup, which very little 22exploration is needed to discover, is that it is complex. There are 23many rules, special cases, and implementation alternatives that all 24combine to confuse the unwary reader. Computer science has long been 25acquainted with such complexity and has tools to help manage it. One 26tool that we will make extensive use of is "divide and conquer". For 27the early parts of the analysis we will divide off symlinks - leaving 28them until the final part. Well before we get to symlinks we have 29another major division based on the VFS's approach to locking which 30will allow us to review "REF-walk" and "RCU-walk" separately. But we 31are getting ahead of ourselves. There are some important low level 32distinctions we need to clarify first. 33 34There are two sorts of ... 35-------------------------- 36 37.. _openat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/openat.2.html 38 39Pathnames (sometimes "file names"), used to identify objects in the 40filesystem, will be familiar to most readers. They contain two sorts 41of elements: "slashes" that are sequences of one or more "``/``" 42characters, and "components" that are sequences of one or more 43non-"``/``" characters. These form two kinds of paths. Those that 44start with slashes are "absolute" and start from the filesystem root. 45The others are "relative" and start from the current directory, or 46from some other location specified by a file descriptor given to 47"``*at()``" system calls such as `openat() <openat_>`_. 48 49.. _execveat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/execveat.2.html 50 51It is tempting to describe the second kind as starting with a 52component, but that isn't always accurate: a pathname can lack both 53slashes and components, it can be empty, in other words. This is 54generally forbidden in POSIX, but some of those "``*at()``" system calls 55in Linux permit it when the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag is given. For 56example, if you have an open file descriptor on an executable file you 57can execute it by calling `execveat() <execveat_>`_ passing 58the file descriptor, an empty path, and the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag. 59 60These paths can be divided into two sections: the final component and 61everything else. The "everything else" is the easy bit. In all cases 62it must identify a directory that already exists, otherwise an error 63such as ``ENOENT`` or ``ENOTDIR`` will be reported. 64 65The final component is not so simple. Not only do different system 66calls interpret it quite differently (e.g. some create it, some do 67not), but it might not even exist: neither the empty pathname nor the 68pathname that is just slashes have a final component. If it does 69exist, it could be "``.``" or "``..``" which are handled quite differently 70from other components. 71 72.. _POSIX: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_12 73 74If a pathname ends with a slash, such as "``/tmp/foo/``" it might be 75tempting to consider that to have an empty final component. In many 76ways that would lead to correct results, but not always. In 77particular, ``mkdir()`` and ``rmdir()`` each create or remove a directory named 78by the final component, and they are required to work with pathnames 79ending in "``/``". According to POSIX_: 80 81 A pathname that contains at least one non-<slash> character and 82 that ends with one or more trailing <slash> characters shall not 83 be resolved successfully unless the last pathname component before 84 the trailing <slash> characters names an existing directory or a 85 directory entry that is to be created for a directory immediately 86 after the pathname is resolved. 87 88The Linux pathname walking code (mostly in ``fs/namei.c``) deals with 89all of these issues: breaking the path into components, handling the 90"everything else" quite separately from the final component, and 91checking that the trailing slash is not used where it isn't 92permitted. It also addresses the important issue of concurrent 93access. 94 95While one process is looking up a pathname, another might be making 96changes that affect that lookup. One fairly extreme case is that if 97"a/b" were renamed to "a/c/b" while another process were looking up 98"a/b/..", that process might successfully resolve on "a/c". 99Most races are much more subtle, and a big part of the task of 100pathname lookup is to prevent them from having damaging effects. Many 101of the possible races are seen most clearly in the context of the 102"dcache" and an understanding of that is central to understanding 103pathname lookup. 104 105More than just a cache 106---------------------- 107 108The "dcache" caches information about names in each filesystem to 109make them quickly available for lookup. Each entry (known as a 110"dentry") contains three significant fields: a component name, a 111pointer to a parent dentry, and a pointer to the "inode" which 112contains further information about the object in that parent with 113the given name. The inode pointer can be ``NULL`` indicating that the 114name doesn't exist in the parent. While there can be linkage in the 115dentry of a directory to the dentries of the children, that linkage is 116not used for pathname lookup, and so will not be considered here. 117 118The dcache has a number of uses apart from accelerating lookup. One 119that will be particularly relevant is that it is closely integrated 120with the mount table that records which filesystem is mounted where. 121What the mount table actually stores is which dentry is mounted on top 122of which other dentry. 123 124When considering the dcache, we have another of our "two types" 125distinctions: there are two types of filesystems. 126 127Some filesystems ensure that the information in the dcache is always 128completely accurate (though not necessarily complete). This can allow 129the VFS to determine if a particular file does or doesn't exist 130without checking with the filesystem, and means that the VFS can 131protect the filesystem against certain races and other problems. 132These are typically "local" filesystems such as ext3, XFS, and Btrfs. 133 134Other filesystems don't provide that guarantee because they cannot. 135These are typically filesystems that are shared across a network, 136whether remote filesystems like NFS and 9P, or cluster filesystems 137like ocfs2 or cephfs. These filesystems allow the VFS to revalidate 138cached information, and must provide their own protection against 139awkward races. The VFS can detect these filesystems by the 140``DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE`` flag being set in the dentry. 141 142REF-walk: simple concurrency management with refcounts and spinlocks 143-------------------------------------------------------------------- 144 145With all of those divisions carefully classified, we can now start 146looking at the actual process of walking along a path. In particular 147we will start with the handling of the "everything else" part of a 148pathname, and focus on the "REF-walk" approach to concurrency 149management. This code is found in the ``link_path_walk()`` function, if 150you ignore all the places that only run when "``LOOKUP_RCU``" 151(indicating the use of RCU-walk) is set. 152 153.. _Meet the Lockers: https://lwn.net/Articles/453685/ 154 155REF-walk is fairly heavy-handed with locks and reference counts. Not 156as heavy-handed as in the old "big kernel lock" days, but certainly not 157afraid of taking a lock when one is needed. It uses a variety of 158different concurrency controls. A background understanding of the 159various primitives is assumed, or can be gleaned from elsewhere such 160as in `Meet the Lockers`_. 161 162The locking mechanisms used by REF-walk include: 163 164dentry->d_lockref 165~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 166 167This uses the lockref primitive to provide both a spinlock and a 168reference count. The special-sauce of this primitive is that the 169conceptual sequence "lock; inc_ref; unlock;" can often be performed 170with a single atomic memory operation. 171 172Holding a reference on a dentry ensures that the dentry won't suddenly 173be freed and used for something else, so the values in various fields 174will behave as expected. It also protects the ``->d_inode`` reference 175to the inode to some extent. 176 177The association between a dentry and its inode is fairly permanent. 178For example, when a file is renamed, the dentry and inode move 179together to the new location. When a file is created the dentry will 180initially be negative (i.e. ``d_inode`` is ``NULL``), and will be assigned 181to the new inode as part of the act of creation. 182 183When a file is deleted, this can be reflected in the cache either by 184setting ``d_inode`` to ``NULL``, or by removing it from the hash table 185(described shortly) used to look up the name in the parent directory. 186If the dentry is still in use the second option is used as it is 187perfectly legal to keep using an open file after it has been deleted 188and having the dentry around helps. If the dentry is not otherwise in 189use (i.e. if the refcount in ``d_lockref`` is one), only then will 190``d_inode`` be set to ``NULL``. Doing it this way is more efficient for a 191very common case. 192 193So as long as a counted reference is held to a dentry, a non-``NULL`` ``->d_inode`` 194value will never be changed. 195 196dentry->d_lock 197~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 198 199``d_lock`` is a synonym for the spinlock that is part of ``d_lockref`` above. 200For our purposes, holding this lock protects against the dentry being 201renamed or unlinked. In particular, its parent (``d_parent``), and its 202name (``d_name``) cannot be changed, and it cannot be removed from the 203dentry hash table. 204 205When looking for a name in a directory, REF-walk takes ``d_lock`` on 206each candidate dentry that it finds in the hash table and then checks 207that the parent and name are correct. So it doesn't lock the parent 208while searching in the cache; it only locks children. 209 210When looking for the parent for a given name (to handle "``..``"), 211REF-walk can take ``d_lock`` to get a stable reference to ``d_parent``, 212but it first tries a more lightweight approach. As seen in 213``dget_parent()``, if a reference can be claimed on the parent, and if 214subsequently ``d_parent`` can be seen to have not changed, then there is 215no need to actually take the lock on the child. 216 217rename_lock 218~~~~~~~~~~~ 219 220Looking up a given name in a given directory involves computing a hash 221from the two values (the name and the dentry of the directory), 222accessing that slot in a hash table, and searching the linked list 223that is found there. 224 225When a dentry is renamed, the name and the parent dentry can both 226change so the hash will almost certainly change too. This would move the 227dentry to a different chain in the hash table. If a filename search 228happened to be looking at a dentry that was moved in this way, 229it might end up continuing the search down the wrong chain, 230and so miss out on part of the correct chain. 231 232The name-lookup process (``d_lookup()``) does *not* try to prevent this 233from happening, but only to detect when it happens. 234``rename_lock`` is a seqlock that is updated whenever any dentry is 235renamed. If ``d_lookup`` finds that a rename happened while it 236unsuccessfully scanned a chain in the hash table, it simply tries 237again. 238 239``rename_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks 240against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where 241the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()`` 242check). If ``rename_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters 243a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with 244``-EAGAIN``. 245 246inode->i_rwsem 247~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 248 249``i_rwsem`` is a read/write semaphore that serializes all changes to a particular 250directory. This ensures that, for example, an ``unlink()`` and a ``rename()`` 251cannot both happen at the same time. It also keeps the directory 252stable while the filesystem is asked to look up a name that is not 253currently in the dcache or, optionally, when the list of entries in a 254directory is being retrieved with ``readdir()``. 255 256This has a complementary role to that of ``d_lock``: ``i_rwsem`` on a 257directory protects all of the names in that directory, while ``d_lock`` 258on a name protects just one name in a directory. Most changes to the 259dcache hold ``i_rwsem`` on the relevant directory inode and briefly take 260``d_lock`` on one or more the dentries while the change happens. One 261exception is when idle dentries are removed from the dcache due to 262memory pressure. This uses ``d_lock``, but ``i_rwsem`` plays no role. 263 264The semaphore affects pathname lookup in two distinct ways. Firstly it 265prevents changes during lookup of a name in a directory. ``walk_component()`` uses 266``lookup_fast()`` first which, in turn, checks to see if the name is in the cache, 267using only ``d_lock`` locking. If the name isn't found, then ``walk_component()`` 268falls back to ``lookup_slow()`` which takes a shared lock on ``i_rwsem``, checks again that 269the name isn't in the cache, and then calls in to the filesystem to get a 270definitive answer. A new dentry will be added to the cache regardless of 271the result. 272 273Secondly, when pathname lookup reaches the final component, it will 274sometimes need to take an exclusive lock on ``i_rwsem`` before performing the last lookup so 275that the required exclusion can be achieved. How path lookup chooses 276to take, or not take, ``i_rwsem`` is one of the 277issues addressed in a subsequent section. 278 279If two threads attempt to look up the same name at the same time - a 280name that is not yet in the dcache - the shared lock on ``i_rwsem`` will 281not prevent them both adding new dentries with the same name. As this 282would result in confusion an extra level of interlocking is used, 283based around a secondary hash table (``in_lookup_hashtable``) and a 284per-dentry flag bit (``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``). 285 286To add a new dentry to the cache while only holding a shared lock on 287``i_rwsem``, a thread must call ``d_alloc_parallel()``. This allocates a 288dentry, stores the required name and parent in it, checks if there 289is already a matching dentry in the primary or secondary hash 290tables, and if not, stores the newly allocated dentry in the secondary 291hash table, with ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` set. 292 293If a matching dentry was found in the primary hash table then that is 294returned and the caller can know that it lost a race with some other 295thread adding the entry. If no matching dentry is found in either 296cache, the newly allocated dentry is returned and the caller can 297detect this from the presence of ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``. In this case it 298knows that it has won any race and now is responsible for asking the 299filesystem to perform the lookup and find the matching inode. When 300the lookup is complete, it must call ``d_lookup_done()`` which clears 301the flag and does some other house keeping, including removing the 302dentry from the secondary hash table - it will normally have been 303added to the primary hash table already. Note that a ``struct 304waitqueue_head`` is passed to ``d_alloc_parallel()``, and 305``d_lookup_done()`` must be called while this ``waitqueue_head`` is still 306in scope. 307 308If a matching dentry is found in the secondary hash table, 309``d_alloc_parallel()`` has a little more work to do. It first waits for 310``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` to be cleared, using a wait_queue that was passed 311to the instance of ``d_alloc_parallel()`` that won the race and that 312will be woken by the call to ``d_lookup_done()``. It then checks to see 313if the dentry has now been added to the primary hash table. If it 314has, the dentry is returned and the caller just sees that it lost any 315race. If it hasn't been added to the primary hash table, the most 316likely explanation is that some other dentry was added instead using 317``d_splice_alias()``. In any case, ``d_alloc_parallel()`` repeats all the 318look ups from the start and will normally return something from the 319primary hash table. 320 321mnt->mnt_count 322~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 323 324``mnt_count`` is a per-CPU reference counter on "``mount``" structures. 325Per-CPU here means that incrementing the count is cheap as it only 326uses CPU-local memory, but checking if the count is zero is expensive as 327it needs to check with every CPU. Taking a ``mnt_count`` reference 328prevents the mount structure from disappearing as the result of regular 329unmount operations, but does not prevent a "lazy" unmount. So holding 330``mnt_count`` doesn't ensure that the mount remains in the namespace and, 331in particular, doesn't stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry. It 332does, however, ensure that the ``mount`` data structure remains coherent, 333and it provides a reference to the root dentry of the mounted 334filesystem. So a reference through ``->mnt_count`` provides a stable 335reference to the mounted dentry, but not the mounted-on dentry. 336 337mount_lock 338~~~~~~~~~~ 339 340``mount_lock`` is a global seqlock, a bit like ``rename_lock``. It can be used to 341check if any change has been made to any mount points. 342 343While walking down the tree (away from the root) this lock is used when 344crossing a mount point to check that the crossing was safe. That is, 345the value in the seqlock is read, then the code finds the mount that 346is mounted on the current directory, if there is one, and increments 347the ``mnt_count``. Finally the value in ``mount_lock`` is checked against 348the old value. If there is no change, then the crossing was safe. If there 349was a change, the ``mnt_count`` is decremented and the whole process is 350retried. 351 352When walking up the tree (towards the root) by following a ".." link, 353a little more care is needed. In this case the seqlock (which 354contains both a counter and a spinlock) is fully locked to prevent 355any changes to any mount points while stepping up. This locking is 356needed to stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry, which the 357refcount on the mount itself doesn't ensure. 358 359``mount_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks 360against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where 361the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()`` 362check). If ``mount_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters 363a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with 364``-EAGAIN``. 365 366RCU 367~~~ 368 369Finally the global (but extremely lightweight) RCU read lock is held 370from time to time to ensure certain data structures don't get freed 371unexpectedly. 372 373In particular it is held while scanning chains in the dcache hash 374table, and the mount point hash table. 375 376Bringing it together with ``struct nameidata`` 377---------------------------------------------- 378 379.. _First edition Unix: https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V1/u2.s 380 381Throughout the process of walking a path, the current status is stored 382in a ``struct nameidata``, "namei" being the traditional name - dating 383all the way back to `First Edition Unix`_ - of the function that 384converts a "name" to an "inode". ``struct nameidata`` contains (among 385other fields): 386 387``struct path path`` 388~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 389 390A ``path`` contains a ``struct vfsmount`` (which is 391embedded in a ``struct mount``) and a ``struct dentry``. Together these 392record the current status of the walk. They start out referring to the 393starting point (the current working directory, the root directory, or some other 394directory identified by a file descriptor), and are updated on each 395step. A reference through ``d_lockref`` and ``mnt_count`` is always 396held. 397 398``struct qstr last`` 399~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 400 401This is a string together with a length (i.e. *not* ``nul`` terminated) 402that is the "next" component in the pathname. 403 404``int last_type`` 405~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 406 407This is one of ``LAST_NORM``, ``LAST_ROOT``, ``LAST_DOT`` or ``LAST_DOTDOT``. 408The ``last`` field is only valid if the type is ``LAST_NORM``. 409 410``struct path root`` 411~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 412 413This is used to hold a reference to the effective root of the 414filesystem. Often that reference won't be needed, so this field is 415only assigned the first time it is used, or when a non-standard root 416is requested. Keeping a reference in the ``nameidata`` ensures that 417only one root is in effect for the entire path walk, even if it races 418with a ``chroot()`` system call. 419 420It should be noted that in the case of ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` or 421``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, the effective root becomes the directory file descriptor 422passed to ``openat2()`` (which exposes these ``LOOKUP_`` flags). 423 424The root is needed when either of two conditions holds: (1) either the 425pathname or a symbolic link starts with a "'/'", or (2) a "``..``" 426component is being handled, since "``..``" from the root must always stay 427at the root. The value used is usually the current root directory of 428the calling process. An alternate root can be provided as when 429``sysctl()`` calls ``file_open_root()``, and when NFSv4 or Btrfs call 430``mount_subtree()``. In each case a pathname is being looked up in a very 431specific part of the filesystem, and the lookup must not be allowed to 432escape that subtree. It works a bit like a local ``chroot()``. 433 434Ignoring the handling of symbolic links, we can now describe the 435"``link_path_walk()``" function, which handles the lookup of everything 436except the final component as: 437 438 Given a path (``name``) and a nameidata structure (``nd``), check that the 439 current directory has execute permission and then advance ``name`` 440 over one component while updating ``last_type`` and ``last``. If that 441 was the final component, then return, otherwise call 442 ``walk_component()`` and repeat from the top. 443 444``walk_component()`` is even easier. If the component is ``LAST_DOTS``, 445it calls ``handle_dots()`` which does the necessary locking as already 446described. If it finds a ``LAST_NORM`` component it first calls 447"``lookup_fast()``" which only looks in the dcache, but will ask the 448filesystem to revalidate the result if it is that sort of filesystem. 449If that doesn't get a good result, it calls "``lookup_slow()``" which 450takes ``i_rwsem``, rechecks the cache, and then asks the filesystem 451to find a definitive answer. Each of these will call 452``follow_managed()`` (as described below) to handle any mount points. 453 454In the absence of symbolic links, ``walk_component()`` creates a new 455``struct path`` containing a counted reference to the new dentry and a 456reference to the new ``vfsmount`` which is only counted if it is 457different from the previous ``vfsmount``. It then calls 458``path_to_nameidata()`` to install the new ``struct path`` in the 459``struct nameidata`` and drop the unneeded references. 460 461This "hand-over-hand" sequencing of getting a reference to the new 462dentry before dropping the reference to the previous dentry may 463seem obvious, but is worth pointing out so that we will recognize its 464analogue in the "RCU-walk" version. 465 466Handling the final component 467---------------------------- 468 469``link_path_walk()`` only walks as far as setting ``nd->last`` and 470``nd->last_type`` to refer to the final component of the path. It does 471not call ``walk_component()`` that last time. Handling that final 472component remains for the caller to sort out. Those callers are 473``path_lookupat()``, ``path_parentat()``, ``path_mountpoint()`` and 474``path_openat()`` each of which handles the differing requirements of 475different system calls. 476 477``path_parentat()`` is clearly the simplest - it just wraps a little bit 478of housekeeping around ``link_path_walk()`` and returns the parent 479directory and final component to the caller. The caller will be either 480aiming to create a name (via ``filename_create()``) or remove or rename 481a name (in which case ``user_path_parent()`` is used). They will use 482``i_rwsem`` to exclude other changes while they validate and then 483perform their operation. 484 485``path_lookupat()`` is nearly as simple - it is used when an existing 486object is wanted such as by ``stat()`` or ``chmod()``. It essentially just 487calls ``walk_component()`` on the final component through a call to 488``lookup_last()``. ``path_lookupat()`` returns just the final dentry. 489 490``path_mountpoint()`` handles the special case of unmounting which must 491not try to revalidate the mounted filesystem. It effectively 492contains, through a call to ``mountpoint_last()``, an alternate 493implementation of ``lookup_slow()`` which skips that step. This is 494important when unmounting a filesystem that is inaccessible, such as 495one provided by a dead NFS server. 496 497Finally ``path_openat()`` is used for the ``open()`` system call; it 498contains, in support functions starting with "``do_last()``", all the 499complexity needed to handle the different subtleties of O_CREAT (with 500or without O_EXCL), final "``/``" characters, and trailing symbolic 501links. We will revisit this in the final part of this series, which 502focuses on those symbolic links. "``do_last()``" will sometimes, but 503not always, take ``i_rwsem``, depending on what it finds. 504 505Each of these, or the functions which call them, need to be alert to 506the possibility that the final component is not ``LAST_NORM``. If the 507goal of the lookup is to create something, then any value for 508``last_type`` other than ``LAST_NORM`` will result in an error. For 509example if ``path_parentat()`` reports ``LAST_DOTDOT``, then the caller 510won't try to create that name. They also check for trailing slashes 511by testing ``last.name[last.len]``. If there is any character beyond 512the final component, it must be a trailing slash. 513 514Revalidation and automounts 515--------------------------- 516 517Apart from symbolic links, there are only two parts of the "REF-walk" 518process not yet covered. One is the handling of stale cache entries 519and the other is automounts. 520 521On filesystems that require it, the lookup routines will call the 522``->d_revalidate()`` dentry method to ensure that the cached information 523is current. This will often confirm validity or update a few details 524from a server. In some cases it may find that there has been change 525further up the path and that something that was thought to be valid 526previously isn't really. When this happens the lookup of the whole 527path is aborted and retried with the "``LOOKUP_REVAL``" flag set. This 528forces revalidation to be more thorough. We will see more details of 529this retry process in the next article. 530 531Automount points are locations in the filesystem where an attempt to 532lookup a name can trigger changes to how that lookup should be 533handled, in particular by mounting a filesystem there. These are 534covered in greater detail in autofs.txt in the Linux documentation 535tree, but a few notes specifically related to path lookup are in order 536here. 537 538The Linux VFS has a concept of "managed" dentries which is reflected 539in function names such as "``follow_managed()``". There are three 540potentially interesting things about these dentries corresponding 541to three different flags that might be set in ``dentry->d_flags``: 542 543``DCACHE_MANAGE_TRANSIT`` 544~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 545 546If this flag has been set, then the filesystem has requested that the 547``d_manage()`` dentry operation be called before handling any possible 548mount point. This can perform two particular services: 549 550It can block to avoid races. If an automount point is being 551unmounted, the ``d_manage()`` function will usually wait for that 552process to complete before letting the new lookup proceed and possibly 553trigger a new automount. 554 555It can selectively allow only some processes to transit through a 556mount point. When a server process is managing automounts, it may 557need to access a directory without triggering normal automount 558processing. That server process can identify itself to the ``autofs`` 559filesystem, which will then give it a special pass through 560``d_manage()`` by returning ``-EISDIR``. 561 562``DCACHE_MOUNTED`` 563~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 564 565This flag is set on every dentry that is mounted on. As Linux 566supports multiple filesystem namespaces, it is possible that the 567dentry may not be mounted on in *this* namespace, just in some 568other. So this flag is seen as a hint, not a promise. 569 570If this flag is set, and ``d_manage()`` didn't return ``-EISDIR``, 571``lookup_mnt()`` is called to examine the mount hash table (honoring the 572``mount_lock`` described earlier) and possibly return a new ``vfsmount`` 573and a new ``dentry`` (both with counted references). 574 575``DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT`` 576~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 577 578If ``d_manage()`` allowed us to get this far, and ``lookup_mnt()`` didn't 579find a mount point, then this flag causes the ``d_automount()`` dentry 580operation to be called. 581 582The ``d_automount()`` operation can be arbitrarily complex and may 583communicate with server processes etc. but it should ultimately either 584report that there was an error, that there was nothing to mount, or 585should provide an updated ``struct path`` with new ``dentry`` and ``vfsmount``. 586 587In the latter case, ``finish_automount()`` will be called to safely 588install the new mount point into the mount table. 589 590There is no new locking of import here and it is important that no 591locks (only counted references) are held over this processing due to 592the very real possibility of extended delays. 593This will become more important next time when we examine RCU-walk 594which is particularly sensitive to delays. 595 596RCU-walk - faster pathname lookup in Linux 597========================================== 598 599RCU-walk is another algorithm for performing pathname lookup in Linux. 600It is in many ways similar to REF-walk and the two share quite a bit 601of code. The significant difference in RCU-walk is how it allows for 602the possibility of concurrent access. 603 604We noted that REF-walk is complex because there are numerous details 605and special cases. RCU-walk reduces this complexity by simply 606refusing to handle a number of cases -- it instead falls back to 607REF-walk. The difficulty with RCU-walk comes from a different 608direction: unfamiliarity. The locking rules when depending on RCU are 609quite different from traditional locking, so we will spend a little extra 610time when we come to those. 611 612Clear demarcation of roles 613-------------------------- 614 615The easiest way to manage concurrency is to forcibly stop any other 616thread from changing the data structures that a given thread is 617looking at. In cases where no other thread would even think of 618changing the data and lots of different threads want to read at the 619same time, this can be very costly. Even when using locks that permit 620multiple concurrent readers, the simple act of updating the count of 621the number of current readers can impose an unwanted cost. So the 622goal when reading a shared data structure that no other process is 623changing is to avoid writing anything to memory at all. Take no 624locks, increment no counts, leave no footprints. 625 626The REF-walk mechanism already described certainly doesn't follow this 627principle, but then it is really designed to work when there may well 628be other threads modifying the data. RCU-walk, in contrast, is 629designed for the common situation where there are lots of frequent 630readers and only occasional writers. This may not be common in all 631parts of the filesystem tree, but in many parts it will be. For the 632other parts it is important that RCU-walk can quickly fall back to 633using REF-walk. 634 635Pathname lookup always starts in RCU-walk mode but only remains there 636as long as what it is looking for is in the cache and is stable. It 637dances lightly down the cached filesystem image, leaving no footprints 638and carefully watching where it is, to be sure it doesn't trip. If it 639notices that something has changed or is changing, or if something 640isn't in the cache, then it tries to stop gracefully and switch to 641REF-walk. 642 643This stopping requires getting a counted reference on the current 644``vfsmount`` and ``dentry``, and ensuring that these are still valid - 645that a path walk with REF-walk would have found the same entries. 646This is an invariant that RCU-walk must guarantee. It can only make 647decisions, such as selecting the next step, that are decisions which 648REF-walk could also have made if it were walking down the tree at the 649same time. If the graceful stop succeeds, the rest of the path is 650processed with the reliable, if slightly sluggish, REF-walk. If 651RCU-walk finds it cannot stop gracefully, it simply gives up and 652restarts from the top with REF-walk. 653 654This pattern of "try RCU-walk, if that fails try REF-walk" can be 655clearly seen in functions like ``filename_lookup()``, 656``filename_parentat()``, ``filename_mountpoint()``, 657``do_filp_open()``, and ``do_file_open_root()``. These five 658correspond roughly to the four ``path_*()`` functions we met earlier, 659each of which calls ``link_path_walk()``. The ``path_*()`` functions are 660called using different mode flags until a mode is found which works. 661They are first called with ``LOOKUP_RCU`` set to request "RCU-walk". If 662that fails with the error ``ECHILD`` they are called again with no 663special flag to request "REF-walk". If either of those report the 664error ``ESTALE`` a final attempt is made with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` set (and no 665``LOOKUP_RCU``) to ensure that entries found in the cache are forcibly 666revalidated - normally entries are only revalidated if the filesystem 667determines that they are too old to trust. 668 669The ``LOOKUP_RCU`` attempt may drop that flag internally and switch to 670REF-walk, but will never then try to switch back to RCU-walk. Places 671that trip up RCU-walk are much more likely to be near the leaves and 672so it is very unlikely that there will be much, if any, benefit from 673switching back. 674 675RCU and seqlocks: fast and light 676-------------------------------- 677 678RCU is, unsurprisingly, critical to RCU-walk mode. The 679``rcu_read_lock()`` is held for the entire time that RCU-walk is walking 680down a path. The particular guarantee it provides is that the key 681data structures - dentries, inodes, super_blocks, and mounts - will 682not be freed while the lock is held. They might be unlinked or 683invalidated in one way or another, but the memory will not be 684repurposed so values in various fields will still be meaningful. This 685is the only guarantee that RCU provides; everything else is done using 686seqlocks. 687 688As we saw above, REF-walk holds a counted reference to the current 689dentry and the current vfsmount, and does not release those references 690before taking references to the "next" dentry or vfsmount. It also 691sometimes takes the ``d_lock`` spinlock. These references and locks are 692taken to prevent certain changes from happening. RCU-walk must not 693take those references or locks and so cannot prevent such changes. 694Instead, it checks to see if a change has been made, and aborts or 695retries if it has. 696 697To preserve the invariant mentioned above (that RCU-walk may only make 698decisions that REF-walk could have made), it must make the checks at 699or near the same places that REF-walk holds the references. So, when 700REF-walk increments a reference count or takes a spinlock, RCU-walk 701samples the status of a seqlock using ``read_seqcount_begin()`` or a 702similar function. When REF-walk decrements the count or drops the 703lock, RCU-walk checks if the sampled status is still valid using 704``read_seqcount_retry()`` or similar. 705 706However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that. If 707RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected 708structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a priori 709guarantee of any consistency between those accesses. When consistency 710is needed - which it usually is - RCU-walk must take a copy and then 711use ``read_seqcount_retry()`` to validate that copy. 712 713``read_seqcount_retry()`` not only checks the sequence number, but also 714imposes a memory barrier so that no memory-read instruction from 715*before* the call can be delayed until *after* the call, either by the 716CPU or by the compiler. A simple example of this can be seen in 717``slow_dentry_cmp()`` which, for filesystems which do not use simple 718byte-wise name equality, calls into the filesystem to compare a name 719against a dentry. The length and name pointer are copied into local 720variables, then ``read_seqcount_retry()`` is called to confirm the two 721are consistent, and only then is ``->d_compare()`` called. When 722standard filename comparison is used, ``dentry_cmp()`` is called 723instead. Notably it does *not* use ``read_seqcount_retry()``, but 724instead has a large comment explaining why the consistency guarantee 725isn't necessary. A subsequent ``read_seqcount_retry()`` will be 726sufficient to catch any problem that could occur at this point. 727 728With that little refresher on seqlocks out of the way we can look at 729the bigger picture of how RCU-walk uses seqlocks. 730 731``mount_lock`` and ``nd->m_seq`` 732~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 733 734We already met the ``mount_lock`` seqlock when REF-walk used it to 735ensure that crossing a mount point is performed safely. RCU-walk uses 736it for that too, but for quite a bit more. 737 738Instead of taking a counted reference to each ``vfsmount`` as it 739descends the tree, RCU-walk samples the state of ``mount_lock`` at the 740start of the walk and stores this initial sequence number in the 741``struct nameidata`` in the ``m_seq`` field. This one lock and one 742sequence number are used to validate all accesses to all ``vfsmounts``, 743and all mount point crossings. As changes to the mount table are 744relatively rare, it is reasonable to fall back on REF-walk any time 745that any "mount" or "unmount" happens. 746 747``m_seq`` is checked (using ``read_seqretry()``) at the end of an RCU-walk 748sequence, whether switching to REF-walk for the rest of the path or 749when the end of the path is reached. It is also checked when stepping 750down over a mount point (in ``__follow_mount_rcu()``) or up (in 751``follow_dotdot_rcu()``). If it is ever found to have changed, the 752whole RCU-walk sequence is aborted and the path is processed again by 753REF-walk. 754 755If RCU-walk finds that ``mount_lock`` hasn't changed then it can be sure 756that, had REF-walk taken counted references on each vfsmount, the 757results would have been the same. This ensures the invariant holds, 758at least for vfsmount structures. 759 760``dentry->d_seq`` and ``nd->seq`` 761~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 762 763In place of taking a count or lock on ``d_reflock``, RCU-walk samples 764the per-dentry ``d_seq`` seqlock, and stores the sequence number in the 765``seq`` field of the nameidata structure, so ``nd->seq`` should always be 766the current sequence number of ``nd->dentry``. This number needs to be 767revalidated after copying, and before using, the name, parent, or 768inode of the dentry. 769 770The handling of the name we have already looked at, and the parent is 771only accessed in ``follow_dotdot_rcu()`` which fairly trivially follows 772the required pattern, though it does so for three different cases. 773 774When not at a mount point, ``d_parent`` is followed and its ``d_seq`` is 775collected. When we are at a mount point, we instead follow the 776``mnt->mnt_mountpoint`` link to get a new dentry and collect its 777``d_seq``. Then, after finally finding a ``d_parent`` to follow, we must 778check if we have landed on a mount point and, if so, must find that 779mount point and follow the ``mnt->mnt_root`` link. This would imply a 780somewhat unusual, but certainly possible, circumstance where the 781starting point of the path lookup was in part of the filesystem that 782was mounted on, and so not visible from the root. 783 784The inode pointer, stored in ``->d_inode``, is a little more 785interesting. The inode will always need to be accessed at least 786twice, once to determine if it is NULL and once to verify access 787permissions. Symlink handling requires a validated inode pointer too. 788Rather than revalidating on each access, a copy is made on the first 789access and it is stored in the ``inode`` field of ``nameidata`` from where 790it can be safely accessed without further validation. 791 792``lookup_fast()`` is the only lookup routine that is used in RCU-mode, 793``lookup_slow()`` being too slow and requiring locks. It is in 794``lookup_fast()`` that we find the important "hand over hand" tracking 795of the current dentry. 796 797The current ``dentry`` and current ``seq`` number are passed to 798``__d_lookup_rcu()`` which, on success, returns a new ``dentry`` and a 799new ``seq`` number. ``lookup_fast()`` then copies the inode pointer and 800revalidates the new ``seq`` number. It then validates the old ``dentry`` 801with the old ``seq`` number one last time and only then continues. This 802process of getting the ``seq`` number of the new dentry and then 803checking the ``seq`` number of the old exactly mirrors the process of 804getting a counted reference to the new dentry before dropping that for 805the old dentry which we saw in REF-walk. 806 807No ``inode->i_rwsem`` or even ``rename_lock`` 808~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 809 810A semaphore is a fairly heavyweight lock that can only be taken when it is 811permissible to sleep. As ``rcu_read_lock()`` forbids sleeping, 812``inode->i_rwsem`` plays no role in RCU-walk. If some other thread does 813take ``i_rwsem`` and modifies the directory in a way that RCU-walk needs 814to notice, the result will be either that RCU-walk fails to find the 815dentry that it is looking for, or it will find a dentry which 816``read_seqretry()`` won't validate. In either case it will drop down to 817REF-walk mode which can take whatever locks are needed. 818 819Though ``rename_lock`` could be used by RCU-walk as it doesn't require 820any sleeping, RCU-walk doesn't bother. REF-walk uses ``rename_lock`` to 821protect against the possibility of hash chains in the dcache changing 822while they are being searched. This can result in failing to find 823something that actually is there. When RCU-walk fails to find 824something in the dentry cache, whether it is really there or not, it 825already drops down to REF-walk and tries again with appropriate 826locking. This neatly handles all cases, so adding extra checks on 827rename_lock would bring no significant value. 828 829``unlazy walk()`` and ``complete_walk()`` 830----------------------------------------- 831 832That "dropping down to REF-walk" typically involves a call to 833``unlazy_walk()``, so named because "RCU-walk" is also sometimes 834referred to as "lazy walk". ``unlazy_walk()`` is called when 835following the path down to the current vfsmount/dentry pair seems to 836have proceeded successfully, but the next step is problematic. This 837can happen if the next name cannot be found in the dcache, if 838permission checking or name revalidation couldn't be achieved while 839the ``rcu_read_lock()`` is held (which forbids sleeping), if an 840automount point is found, or in a couple of cases involving symlinks. 841It is also called from ``complete_walk()`` when the lookup has reached 842the final component, or the very end of the path, depending on which 843particular flavor of lookup is used. 844 845Other reasons for dropping out of RCU-walk that do not trigger a call 846to ``unlazy_walk()`` are when some inconsistency is found that cannot be 847handled immediately, such as ``mount_lock`` or one of the ``d_seq`` 848seqlocks reporting a change. In these cases the relevant function 849will return ``-ECHILD`` which will percolate up until it triggers a new 850attempt from the top using REF-walk. 851 852For those cases where ``unlazy_walk()`` is an option, it essentially 853takes a reference on each of the pointers that it holds (vfsmount, 854dentry, and possibly some symbolic links) and then verifies that the 855relevant seqlocks have not been changed. If there have been changes, 856it, too, aborts with ``-ECHILD``, otherwise the transition to REF-walk 857has been a success and the lookup process continues. 858 859Taking a reference on those pointers is not quite as simple as just 860incrementing a counter. That works to take a second reference if you 861already have one (often indirectly through another object), but it 862isn't sufficient if you don't actually have a counted reference at 863all. For ``dentry->d_lockref``, it is safe to increment the reference 864counter to get a reference unless it has been explicitly marked as 865"dead" which involves setting the counter to ``-128``. 866``lockref_get_not_dead()`` achieves this. 867 868For ``mnt->mnt_count`` it is safe to take a reference as long as 869``mount_lock`` is then used to validate the reference. If that 870validation fails, it may *not* be safe to just drop that reference in 871the standard way of calling ``mnt_put()`` - an unmount may have 872progressed too far. So the code in ``legitimize_mnt()``, when it 873finds that the reference it got might not be safe, checks the 874``MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT`` flag to determine if a simple ``mnt_put()`` is 875correct, or if it should just decrement the count and pretend none of 876this ever happened. 877 878Taking care in filesystems 879-------------------------- 880 881RCU-walk depends almost entirely on cached information and often will 882not call into the filesystem at all. However there are two places, 883besides the already-mentioned component-name comparison, where the 884file system might be included in RCU-walk, and it must know to be 885careful. 886 887If the filesystem has non-standard permission-checking requirements - 888such as a networked filesystem which may need to check with the server 889- the ``i_op->permission`` interface might be called during RCU-walk. 890In this case an extra "``MAY_NOT_BLOCK``" flag is passed so that it 891knows not to sleep, but to return ``-ECHILD`` if it cannot complete 892promptly. ``i_op->permission`` is given the inode pointer, not the 893dentry, so it doesn't need to worry about further consistency checks. 894However if it accesses any other filesystem data structures, it must 895ensure they are safe to be accessed with only the ``rcu_read_lock()`` 896held. This typically means they must be freed using ``kfree_rcu()`` or 897similar. 898 899.. _READ_ONCE: https://lwn.net/Articles/624126/ 900 901If the filesystem may need to revalidate dcache entries, then 902``d_op->d_revalidate`` may be called in RCU-walk too. This interface 903*is* passed the dentry but does not have access to the ``inode`` or the 904``seq`` number from the ``nameidata``, so it needs to be extra careful 905when accessing fields in the dentry. This "extra care" typically 906involves using `READ_ONCE() <READ_ONCE_>`_ to access fields, and verifying the 907result is not NULL before using it. This pattern can be seen in 908``nfs_lookup_revalidate()``. 909 910A pair of patterns 911------------------ 912 913In various places in the details of REF-walk and RCU-walk, and also in 914the big picture, there are a couple of related patterns that are worth 915being aware of. 916 917The first is "try quickly and check, if that fails try slowly". We 918can see that in the high-level approach of first trying RCU-walk and 919then trying REF-walk, and in places where ``unlazy_walk()`` is used to 920switch to REF-walk for the rest of the path. We also saw it earlier 921in ``dget_parent()`` when following a "``..``" link. It tries a quick way 922to get a reference, then falls back to taking locks if needed. 923 924The second pattern is "try quickly and check, if that fails try 925again - repeatedly". This is seen with the use of ``rename_lock`` and 926``mount_lock`` in REF-walk. RCU-walk doesn't make use of this pattern - 927if anything goes wrong it is much safer to just abort and try a more 928sedate approach. 929 930The emphasis here is "try quickly and check". It should probably be 931"try quickly *and carefully*, then check". The fact that checking is 932needed is a reminder that the system is dynamic and only a limited 933number of things are safe at all. The most likely cause of errors in 934this whole process is assuming something is safe when in reality it 935isn't. Careful consideration of what exactly guarantees the safety of 936each access is sometimes necessary. 937 938A walk among the symlinks 939========================= 940 941There are several basic issues that we will examine to understand the 942handling of symbolic links: the symlink stack, together with cache 943lifetimes, will help us understand the overall recursive handling of 944symlinks and lead to the special care needed for the final component. 945Then a consideration of access-time updates and summary of the various 946flags controlling lookup will finish the story. 947 948The symlink stack 949----------------- 950 951There are only two sorts of filesystem objects that can usefully 952appear in a path prior to the final component: directories and symlinks. 953Handling directories is quite straightforward: the new directory 954simply becomes the starting point at which to interpret the next 955component on the path. Handling symbolic links requires a bit more 956work. 957 958Conceptually, symbolic links could be handled by editing the path. If 959a component name refers to a symbolic link, then that component is 960replaced by the body of the link and, if that body starts with a '/', 961then all preceding parts of the path are discarded. This is what the 962"``readlink -f``" command does, though it also edits out "``.``" and 963"``..``" components. 964 965Directly editing the path string is not really necessary when looking 966up a path, and discarding early components is pointless as they aren't 967looked at anyway. Keeping track of all remaining components is 968important, but they can of course be kept separately; there is no need 969to concatenate them. As one symlink may easily refer to another, 970which in turn can refer to a third, we may need to keep the remaining 971components of several paths, each to be processed when the preceding 972ones are completed. These path remnants are kept on a stack of 973limited size. 974 975There are two reasons for placing limits on how many symlinks can 976occur in a single path lookup. The most obvious is to avoid loops. 977If a symlink referred to itself either directly or through 978intermediaries, then following the symlink can never complete 979successfully - the error ``ELOOP`` must be returned. Loops can be 980detected without imposing limits, but limits are the simplest solution 981and, given the second reason for restriction, quite sufficient. 982 983.. _outlined recently: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1934390/focus=1934550 984 985The second reason was `outlined recently`_ by Linus: 986 987 Because it's a latency and DoS issue too. We need to react well to 988 true loops, but also to "very deep" non-loops. It's not about memory 989 use, it's about users triggering unreasonable CPU resources. 990 991Linux imposes a limit on the length of any pathname: ``PATH_MAX``, which 992is 4096. There are a number of reasons for this limit; not letting the 993kernel spend too much time on just one path is one of them. With 994symbolic links you can effectively generate much longer paths so some 995sort of limit is needed for the same reason. Linux imposes a limit of 996at most 40 symlinks in any one path lookup. It previously imposed a 997further limit of eight on the maximum depth of recursion, but that was 998raised to 40 when a separate stack was implemented, so there is now 999just the one limit. 1000 1001The ``nameidata`` structure that we met in an earlier article contains a 1002small stack that can be used to store the remaining part of up to two 1003symlinks. In many cases this will be sufficient. If it isn't, a 1004separate stack is allocated with room for 40 symlinks. Pathname 1005lookup will never exceed that stack as, once the 40th symlink is 1006detected, an error is returned. 1007 1008It might seem that the name remnants are all that needs to be stored on 1009this stack, but we need a bit more. To see that, we need to move on to 1010cache lifetimes. 1011 1012Storage and lifetime of cached symlinks 1013--------------------------------------- 1014 1015Like other filesystem resources, such as inodes and directory 1016entries, symlinks are cached by Linux to avoid repeated costly access 1017to external storage. It is particularly important for RCU-walk to be 1018able to find and temporarily hold onto these cached entries, so that 1019it doesn't need to drop down into REF-walk. 1020 1021.. _object-oriented design pattern: https://lwn.net/Articles/446317/ 1022 1023While each filesystem is free to make its own choice, symlinks are 1024typically stored in one of two places. Short symlinks are often 1025stored directly in the inode. When a filesystem allocates a ``struct 1026inode`` it typically allocates extra space to store private data (a 1027common `object-oriented design pattern`_ in the kernel). This will 1028sometimes include space for a symlink. The other common location is 1029in the page cache, which normally stores the content of files. The 1030pathname in a symlink can be seen as the content of that symlink and 1031can easily be stored in the page cache just like file content. 1032 1033When neither of these is suitable, the next most likely scenario is 1034that the filesystem will allocate some temporary memory and copy or 1035construct the symlink content into that memory whenever it is needed. 1036 1037When the symlink is stored in the inode, it has the same lifetime as 1038the inode which, itself, is protected by RCU or by a counted reference 1039on the dentry. This means that the mechanisms that pathname lookup 1040uses to access the dcache and icache (inode cache) safely are quite 1041sufficient for accessing some cached symlinks safely. In these cases, 1042the ``i_link`` pointer in the inode is set to point to wherever the 1043symlink is stored and it can be accessed directly whenever needed. 1044 1045When the symlink is stored in the page cache or elsewhere, the 1046situation is not so straightforward. A reference on a dentry or even 1047on an inode does not imply any reference on cached pages of that 1048inode, and even an ``rcu_read_lock()`` is not sufficient to ensure that 1049a page will not disappear. So for these symlinks the pathname lookup 1050code needs to ask the filesystem to provide a stable reference and, 1051significantly, needs to release that reference when it is finished 1052with it. 1053 1054Taking a reference to a cache page is often possible even in RCU-walk 1055mode. It does require making changes to memory, which is best avoided, 1056but that isn't necessarily a big cost and it is better than dropping 1057out of RCU-walk mode completely. Even filesystems that allocate 1058space to copy the symlink into can use ``GFP_ATOMIC`` to often successfully 1059allocate memory without the need to drop out of RCU-walk. If a 1060filesystem cannot successfully get a reference in RCU-walk mode, it 1061must return ``-ECHILD`` and ``unlazy_walk()`` will be called to return to 1062REF-walk mode in which the filesystem is allowed to sleep. 1063 1064The place for all this to happen is the ``i_op->follow_link()`` inode 1065method. In the present mainline code this is never actually called in 1066RCU-walk mode as the rewrite is not quite complete. It is likely that 1067in a future release this method will be passed an ``inode`` pointer when 1068called in RCU-walk mode so it both (1) knows to be careful, and (2) has the 1069validated pointer. Much like the ``i_op->permission()`` method we 1070looked at previously, ``->follow_link()`` would need to be careful that 1071all the data structures it references are safe to be accessed while 1072holding no counted reference, only the RCU lock. Though getting a 1073reference with ``->follow_link()`` is not yet done in RCU-walk mode, the 1074code is ready to release the reference when that does happen. 1075 1076This need to drop the reference to a symlink adds significant 1077complexity. It requires a reference to the inode so that the 1078``i_op->put_link()`` inode operation can be called. In REF-walk, that 1079reference is kept implicitly through a reference to the dentry, so 1080keeping the ``struct path`` of the symlink is easiest. For RCU-walk, 1081the pointer to the inode is kept separately. To allow switching from 1082RCU-walk back to REF-walk in the middle of processing nested symlinks 1083we also need the seq number for the dentry so we can confirm that 1084switching back was safe. 1085 1086Finally, when providing a reference to a symlink, the filesystem also 1087provides an opaque "cookie" that must be passed to ``->put_link()`` so that it 1088knows what to free. This might be the allocated memory area, or a 1089pointer to the ``struct page`` in the page cache, or something else 1090completely. Only the filesystem knows what it is. 1091 1092In order for the reference to each symlink to be dropped when the walk completes, 1093whether in RCU-walk or REF-walk, the symlink stack needs to contain, 1094along with the path remnants: 1095 1096- the ``struct path`` to provide a reference to the inode in REF-walk 1097- the ``struct inode *`` to provide a reference to the inode in RCU-walk 1098- the ``seq`` to allow the path to be safely switched from RCU-walk to REF-walk 1099- the ``cookie`` that tells ``->put_path()`` what to put. 1100 1101This means that each entry in the symlink stack needs to hold five 1102pointers and an integer instead of just one pointer (the path 1103remnant). On a 64-bit system, this is about 40 bytes per entry; 1104with 40 entries it adds up to 1600 bytes total, which is less than 1105half a page. So it might seem like a lot, but is by no means 1106excessive. 1107 1108Note that, in a given stack frame, the path remnant (``name``) is not 1109part of the symlink that the other fields refer to. It is the remnant 1110to be followed once that symlink has been fully parsed. 1111 1112Following the symlink 1113--------------------- 1114 1115The main loop in ``link_path_walk()`` iterates seamlessly over all 1116components in the path and all of the non-final symlinks. As symlinks 1117are processed, the ``name`` pointer is adjusted to point to a new 1118symlink, or is restored from the stack, so that much of the loop 1119doesn't need to notice. Getting this ``name`` variable on and off the 1120stack is very straightforward; pushing and popping the references is 1121a little more complex. 1122 1123When a symlink is found, ``walk_component()`` returns the value ``1`` 1124(``0`` is returned for any other sort of success, and a negative number 1125is, as usual, an error indicator). This causes ``get_link()`` to be 1126called; it then gets the link from the filesystem. Providing that 1127operation is successful, the old path ``name`` is placed on the stack, 1128and the new value is used as the ``name`` for a while. When the end of 1129the path is found (i.e. ``*name`` is ``'\0'``) the old ``name`` is restored 1130off the stack and path walking continues. 1131 1132Pushing and popping the reference pointers (inode, cookie, etc.) is more 1133complex in part because of the desire to handle tail recursion. When 1134the last component of a symlink itself points to a symlink, we 1135want to pop the symlink-just-completed off the stack before pushing 1136the symlink-just-found to avoid leaving empty path remnants that would 1137just get in the way. 1138 1139It is most convenient to push the new symlink references onto the 1140stack in ``walk_component()`` immediately when the symlink is found; 1141``walk_component()`` is also the last piece of code that needs to look at the 1142old symlink as it walks that last component. So it is quite 1143convenient for ``walk_component()`` to release the old symlink and pop 1144the references just before pushing the reference information for the 1145new symlink. It is guided in this by two flags; ``WALK_GET``, which 1146gives it permission to follow a symlink if it finds one, and 1147``WALK_PUT``, which tells it to release the current symlink after it has been 1148followed. ``WALK_PUT`` is tested first, leading to a call to 1149``put_link()``. ``WALK_GET`` is tested subsequently (by 1150``should_follow_link()``) leading to a call to ``pick_link()`` which sets 1151up the stack frame. 1152 1153Symlinks with no final component 1154~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1155 1156A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation. 1157Both result in a new ``struct path`` (with mount and dentry) being set 1158up in the ``nameidata``, and result in ``get_link()`` returning ``NULL``. 1159 1160The more obvious case is a symlink to "``/``". All symlinks starting 1161with "``/``" are detected in ``get_link()`` which resets the ``nameidata`` 1162to point to the effective filesystem root. If the symlink only 1163contains "``/``" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all, 1164so ``NULL`` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and 1165the stack frame discarded. 1166 1167The other case involves things in ``/proc`` that look like symlinks but 1168aren't really (and are therefore commonly referred to as "magic-links"):: 1169 1170 $ ls -l /proc/self/fd/1 1171 lrwx------ 1 neilb neilb 64 Jun 13 10:19 /proc/self/fd/1 -> /dev/pts/4 1172 1173Every open file descriptor in any process is represented in ``/proc`` by 1174something that looks like a symlink. It is really a reference to the 1175target file, not just the name of it. When you ``readlink`` these 1176objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it 1177has been unlinked or mounted over. When ``walk_component()`` follows 1178one of these, the ``->follow_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return 1179a string name, but instead calls ``nd_jump_link()`` which updates the 1180``nameidata`` in place to point to that target. ``->follow_link()`` then 1181returns ``NULL``. Again there is no final component and ``get_link()`` 1182reports this by leaving the ``last_type`` field of ``nameidata`` as 1183``LAST_BIND``. 1184 1185Following the symlink in the final component 1186-------------------------------------------- 1187 1188All this leads to ``link_path_walk()`` walking down every component, and 1189following all symbolic links it finds, until it reaches the final 1190component. This is just returned in the ``last`` field of ``nameidata``. 1191For some callers, this is all they need; they want to create that 1192``last`` name if it doesn't exist or give an error if it does. Other 1193callers will want to follow a symlink if one is found, and possibly 1194apply special handling to the last component of that symlink, rather 1195than just the last component of the original file name. These callers 1196potentially need to call ``link_path_walk()`` again and again on 1197successive symlinks until one is found that doesn't point to another 1198symlink. 1199 1200This case is handled by the relevant caller of ``link_path_walk()``, such as 1201``path_lookupat()`` using a loop that calls ``link_path_walk()``, and then 1202handles the final component. If the final component is a symlink 1203that needs to be followed, then ``trailing_symlink()`` is called to set 1204things up properly and the loop repeats, calling ``link_path_walk()`` 1205again. This could loop as many as 40 times if the last component of 1206each symlink is another symlink. 1207 1208The various functions that examine the final component and possibly 1209report that it is a symlink are ``lookup_last()``, ``mountpoint_last()`` 1210and ``do_last()``, each of which use the same convention as 1211``walk_component()`` of returning ``1`` if a symlink was found that needs 1212to be followed. 1213 1214Of these, ``do_last()`` is the most interesting as it is used for 1215opening a file. Part of ``do_last()`` runs with ``i_rwsem`` held and this 1216part is in a separate function: ``lookup_open()``. 1217 1218Explaining ``do_last()`` completely is beyond the scope of this article, 1219but a few highlights should help those interested in exploring the 1220code. 1221 12221. Rather than just finding the target file, ``do_last()`` needs to open 1223 it. If the file was found in the dcache, then ``vfs_open()`` is used for 1224 this. If not, then ``lookup_open()`` will either call ``atomic_open()`` (if 1225 the filesystem provides it) to combine the final lookup with the open, or 1226 will perform the separate ``lookup_real()`` and ``vfs_create()`` steps 1227 directly. In the later case the actual "open" of this newly found or 1228 created file will be performed by ``vfs_open()``, just as if the name 1229 were found in the dcache. 1230 12312. ``vfs_open()`` can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information 1232 wasn't quite current enough. Rather than restarting the lookup from 1233 the top with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` set, ``lookup_open()`` is called instead, 1234 giving the filesystem a chance to resolve small inconsistencies. 1235 If that doesn't work, only then is the lookup restarted from the top. 1236 12373. An open with O_CREAT **does** follow a symlink in the final component, 1238 unlike other creation system calls (like ``mkdir``). So the sequence:: 1239 1240 ln -s bar /tmp/foo 1241 echo hello > /tmp/foo 1242 1243 will create a file called ``/tmp/bar``. This is not permitted if 1244 ``O_EXCL`` is set but otherwise is handled for an O_CREAT open much 1245 like for a non-creating open: ``should_follow_link()`` returns ``1``, and 1246 so does ``do_last()`` so that ``trailing_symlink()`` gets called and the 1247 open process continues on the symlink that was found. 1248 1249Updating the access time 1250------------------------ 1251 1252We previously said of RCU-walk that it would "take no locks, increment 1253no counts, leave no footprints." We have since seen that some 1254"footprints" can be needed when handling symlinks as a counted 1255reference (or even a memory allocation) may be needed. But these 1256footprints are best kept to a minimum. 1257 1258One other place where walking down a symlink can involve leaving 1259footprints in a way that doesn't affect directories is in updating access times. 1260In Unix (and Linux) every filesystem object has a "last accessed 1261time", or "``atime``". Passing through a directory to access a file 1262within is not considered to be an access for the purposes of 1263``atime``; only listing the contents of a directory can update its ``atime``. 1264Symlinks are different it seems. Both reading a symlink (with ``readlink()``) 1265and looking up a symlink on the way to some other destination can 1266update the atime on that symlink. 1267 1268.. _clearest statement: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_08 1269 1270It is not clear why this is the case; POSIX has little to say on the 1271subject. The `clearest statement`_ is that, if a particular implementation 1272updates a timestamp in a place not specified by POSIX, this must be 1273documented "except that any changes caused by pathname resolution need 1274not be documented". This seems to imply that POSIX doesn't really 1275care about access-time updates during pathname lookup. 1276 1277.. _Linux 1.3.87: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/diff/fs/ext2/symlink.c?id=f806c6db77b8eaa6e00dcfb6b567706feae8dbb8 1278 1279An examination of history shows that prior to `Linux 1.3.87`_, the ext2 1280filesystem, at least, didn't update atime when following a link. 1281Unfortunately we have no record of why that behavior was changed. 1282 1283In any case, access time must now be updated and that operation can be 1284quite complex. Trying to stay in RCU-walk while doing it is best 1285avoided. Fortunately it is often permitted to skip the ``atime`` 1286update. Because ``atime`` updates cause performance problems in various 1287areas, Linux supports the ``relatime`` mount option, which generally 1288limits the updates of ``atime`` to once per day on files that aren't 1289being changed (and symlinks never change once created). Even without 1290``relatime``, many filesystems record ``atime`` with a one-second 1291granularity, so only one update per second is required. 1292 1293It is easy to test if an ``atime`` update is needed while in RCU-walk 1294mode and, if it isn't, the update can be skipped and RCU-walk mode 1295continues. Only when an ``atime`` update is actually required does the 1296path walk drop down to REF-walk. All of this is handled in the 1297``get_link()`` function. 1298 1299A few flags 1300----------- 1301 1302A suitable way to wrap up this tour of pathname walking is to list 1303the various flags that can be stored in the ``nameidata`` to guide the 1304lookup process. Many of these are only meaningful on the final 1305component, others reflect the current state of the pathname lookup, and some 1306apply restrictions to all path components encountered in the path lookup. 1307 1308And then there is ``LOOKUP_EMPTY``, which doesn't fit conceptually with 1309the others. If this is not set, an empty pathname causes an error 1310very early on. If it is set, empty pathnames are not considered to be 1311an error. 1312 1313Global state flags 1314~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1315 1316We have already met two global state flags: ``LOOKUP_RCU`` and 1317``LOOKUP_REVAL``. These select between one of three overall approaches 1318to lookup: RCU-walk, REF-walk, and REF-walk with forced revalidation. 1319 1320``LOOKUP_PARENT`` indicates that the final component hasn't been reached 1321yet. This is primarily used to tell the audit subsystem the full 1322context of a particular access being audited. 1323 1324``LOOKUP_ROOT`` indicates that the ``root`` field in the ``nameidata`` was 1325provided by the caller, so it shouldn't be released when it is no 1326longer needed. 1327 1328``LOOKUP_JUMPED`` means that the current dentry was chosen not because 1329it had the right name but for some other reason. This happens when 1330following "``..``", following a symlink to ``/``, crossing a mount point 1331or accessing a "``/proc/$PID/fd/$FD``" symlink (also known as a "magic 1332link"). In this case the filesystem has not been asked to revalidate the 1333name (with ``d_revalidate()``). In such cases the inode may still need 1334to be revalidated, so ``d_op->d_weak_revalidate()`` is called if 1335``LOOKUP_JUMPED`` is set when the look completes - which may be at the 1336final component or, when creating, unlinking, or renaming, at the penultimate component. 1337 1338Resolution-restriction flags 1339~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1340 1341In order to allow userspace to protect itself against certain race conditions 1342and attack scenarios involving changing path components, a series of flags are 1343available which apply restrictions to all path components encountered during 1344path lookup. These flags are exposed through ``openat2()``'s ``resolve`` field. 1345 1346``LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS`` blocks all symlink traversals (including magic-links). 1347This is distinctly different from ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW``, because the latter only 1348relates to restricting the following of trailing symlinks. 1349 1350``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` blocks all magic-link traversals. Filesystems must 1351ensure that they return errors from ``nd_jump_link()``, because that is how 1352``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` and other magic-link restrictions are implemented. 1353 1354``LOOKUP_NO_XDEV`` blocks all ``vfsmount`` traversals (this includes both 1355bind-mounts and ordinary mounts). Note that the ``vfsmount`` which contains the 1356lookup is determined by the first mountpoint the path lookup reaches -- 1357absolute paths start with the ``vfsmount`` of ``/``, and relative paths start 1358with the ``dfd``'s ``vfsmount``. Magic-links are only permitted if the 1359``vfsmount`` of the path is unchanged. 1360 1361``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` blocks any path components which resolve outside the 1362starting point of the resolution. This is done by blocking ``nd_jump_root()`` 1363as well as blocking ".." if it would jump outside the starting point. 1364``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect attacks against the 1365resolution of "..". Magic-links are also blocked. 1366 1367``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` resolves all path components as though the starting point 1368were the filesystem root. ``nd_jump_root()`` brings the resolution back to 1369the starting point, and ".." at the starting point will act as a no-op. As with 1370``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, ``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect 1371attacks against ".." resolution. Magic-links are also blocked. 1372 1373Final-component flags 1374~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1375 1376Some of these flags are only set when the final component is being 1377considered. Others are only checked for when considering that final 1378component. 1379 1380``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` ensures that, if the final component is an automount 1381point, then the mount is triggered. Some operations would trigger it 1382anyway, but operations like ``stat()`` deliberately don't. ``statfs()`` 1383needs to trigger the mount but otherwise behaves a lot like ``stat()``, so 1384it sets ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT``, as does "``quotactl()``" and the handling of 1385"``mount --bind``". 1386 1387``LOOKUP_FOLLOW`` has a similar function to ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` but for 1388symlinks. Some system calls set or clear it implicitly, while 1389others have API flags such as ``AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW`` and 1390``UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW`` to control it. Its effect is similar to 1391``WALK_GET`` that we already met, but it is used in a different way. 1392 1393``LOOKUP_DIRECTORY`` insists that the final component is a directory. 1394Various callers set this and it is also set when the final component 1395is found to be followed by a slash. 1396 1397Finally ``LOOKUP_OPEN``, ``LOOKUP_CREATE``, ``LOOKUP_EXCL``, and 1398``LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET`` are not used directly by the VFS but are made 1399available to the filesystem and particularly the ``->d_revalidate()`` 1400method. A filesystem can choose not to bother revalidating too hard 1401if it knows that it will be asked to open or create the file soon. 1402These flags were previously useful for ``->lookup()`` too but with the 1403introduction of ``->atomic_open()`` they are less relevant there. 1404 1405End of the road 1406--------------- 1407 1408Despite its complexity, all this pathname lookup code appears to be 1409in good shape - various parts are certainly easier to understand now 1410than even a couple of releases ago. But that doesn't mean it is 1411"finished". As already mentioned, RCU-walk currently only follows 1412symlinks that are stored in the inode so, while it handles many ext4 1413symlinks, it doesn't help with NFS, XFS, or Btrfs. That support 1414is not likely to be long delayed. 1415