1=============== 2Pathname lookup 3=============== 4 5This write-up is based on three articles published at lwn.net: 6 7- <https://lwn.net/Articles/649115/> Pathname lookup in Linux 8- <https://lwn.net/Articles/649729/> RCU-walk: faster pathname lookup in Linux 9- <https://lwn.net/Articles/650786/> A walk among the symlinks 10 11Written by Neil Brown with help from Al Viro and Jon Corbet. 12It has subsequently been updated to reflect changes in the kernel 13including: 14 15- per-directory parallel name lookup. 16- ``openat2()`` resolution restriction flags. 17 18Introduction to pathname lookup 19=============================== 20 21The most obvious aspect of pathname lookup, which very little 22exploration is needed to discover, is that it is complex. There are 23many rules, special cases, and implementation alternatives that all 24combine to confuse the unwary reader. Computer science has long been 25acquainted with such complexity and has tools to help manage it. One 26tool that we will make extensive use of is "divide and conquer". For 27the early parts of the analysis we will divide off symlinks - leaving 28them until the final part. Well before we get to symlinks we have 29another major division based on the VFS's approach to locking which 30will allow us to review "REF-walk" and "RCU-walk" separately. But we 31are getting ahead of ourselves. There are some important low level 32distinctions we need to clarify first. 33 34There are two sorts of ... 35-------------------------- 36 37.. _openat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/openat.2.html 38 39Pathnames (sometimes "file names"), used to identify objects in the 40filesystem, will be familiar to most readers. They contain two sorts 41of elements: "slashes" that are sequences of one or more "``/``" 42characters, and "components" that are sequences of one or more 43non-"``/``" characters. These form two kinds of paths. Those that 44start with slashes are "absolute" and start from the filesystem root. 45The others are "relative" and start from the current directory, or 46from some other location specified by a file descriptor given to a 47"``XXXat``" system call such as `openat() <openat_>`_. 48 49.. _execveat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/execveat.2.html 50 51It is tempting to describe the second kind as starting with a 52component, but that isn't always accurate: a pathname can lack both 53slashes and components, it can be empty, in other words. This is 54generally forbidden in POSIX, but some of those "xxx``at``" system calls 55in Linux permit it when the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag is given. For 56example, if you have an open file descriptor on an executable file you 57can execute it by calling `execveat() <execveat_>`_ passing 58the file descriptor, an empty path, and the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag. 59 60These paths can be divided into two sections: the final component and 61everything else. The "everything else" is the easy bit. In all cases 62it must identify a directory that already exists, otherwise an error 63such as ``ENOENT`` or ``ENOTDIR`` will be reported. 64 65The final component is not so simple. Not only do different system 66calls interpret it quite differently (e.g. some create it, some do 67not), but it might not even exist: neither the empty pathname nor the 68pathname that is just slashes have a final component. If it does 69exist, it could be "``.``" or "``..``" which are handled quite differently 70from other components. 71 72.. _POSIX: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_12 73 74If a pathname ends with a slash, such as "``/tmp/foo/``" it might be 75tempting to consider that to have an empty final component. In many 76ways that would lead to correct results, but not always. In 77particular, ``mkdir()`` and ``rmdir()`` each create or remove a directory named 78by the final component, and they are required to work with pathnames 79ending in "``/``". According to POSIX_ 80 81 A pathname that contains at least one non- <slash> character and 82 that ends with one or more trailing <slash> characters shall not 83 be resolved successfully unless the last pathname component before 84 the trailing <slash> characters names an existing directory or a 85 directory entry that is to be created for a directory immediately 86 after the pathname is resolved. 87 88The Linux pathname walking code (mostly in ``fs/namei.c``) deals with 89all of these issues: breaking the path into components, handling the 90"everything else" quite separately from the final component, and 91checking that the trailing slash is not used where it isn't 92permitted. It also addresses the important issue of concurrent 93access. 94 95While one process is looking up a pathname, another might be making 96changes that affect that lookup. One fairly extreme case is that if 97"a/b" were renamed to "a/c/b" while another process were looking up 98"a/b/..", that process might successfully resolve on "a/c". 99Most races are much more subtle, and a big part of the task of 100pathname lookup is to prevent them from having damaging effects. Many 101of the possible races are seen most clearly in the context of the 102"dcache" and an understanding of that is central to understanding 103pathname lookup. 104 105More than just a cache 106---------------------- 107 108The "dcache" caches information about names in each filesystem to 109make them quickly available for lookup. Each entry (known as a 110"dentry") contains three significant fields: a component name, a 111pointer to a parent dentry, and a pointer to the "inode" which 112contains further information about the object in that parent with 113the given name. The inode pointer can be ``NULL`` indicating that the 114name doesn't exist in the parent. While there can be linkage in the 115dentry of a directory to the dentries of the children, that linkage is 116not used for pathname lookup, and so will not be considered here. 117 118The dcache has a number of uses apart from accelerating lookup. One 119that will be particularly relevant is that it is closely integrated 120with the mount table that records which filesystem is mounted where. 121What the mount table actually stores is which dentry is mounted on top 122of which other dentry. 123 124When considering the dcache, we have another of our "two types" 125distinctions: there are two types of filesystems. 126 127Some filesystems ensure that the information in the dcache is always 128completely accurate (though not necessarily complete). This can allow 129the VFS to determine if a particular file does or doesn't exist 130without checking with the filesystem, and means that the VFS can 131protect the filesystem against certain races and other problems. 132These are typically "local" filesystems such as ext3, XFS, and Btrfs. 133 134Other filesystems don't provide that guarantee because they cannot. 135These are typically filesystems that are shared across a network, 136whether remote filesystems like NFS and 9P, or cluster filesystems 137like ocfs2 or cephfs. These filesystems allow the VFS to revalidate 138cached information, and must provide their own protection against 139awkward races. The VFS can detect these filesystems by the 140``DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE`` flag being set in the dentry. 141 142REF-walk: simple concurrency management with refcounts and spinlocks 143-------------------------------------------------------------------- 144 145With all of those divisions carefully classified, we can now start 146looking at the actual process of walking along a path. In particular 147we will start with the handling of the "everything else" part of a 148pathname, and focus on the "REF-walk" approach to concurrency 149management. This code is found in the ``link_path_walk()`` function, if 150you ignore all the places that only run when "``LOOKUP_RCU``" 151(indicating the use of RCU-walk) is set. 152 153.. _Meet the Lockers: https://lwn.net/Articles/453685/ 154 155REF-walk is fairly heavy-handed with locks and reference counts. Not 156as heavy-handed as in the old "big kernel lock" days, but certainly not 157afraid of taking a lock when one is needed. It uses a variety of 158different concurrency controls. A background understanding of the 159various primitives is assumed, or can be gleaned from elsewhere such 160as in `Meet the Lockers`_. 161 162The locking mechanisms used by REF-walk include: 163 164dentry->d_lockref 165~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 166 167This uses the lockref primitive to provide both a spinlock and a 168reference count. The special-sauce of this primitive is that the 169conceptual sequence "lock; inc_ref; unlock;" can often be performed 170with a single atomic memory operation. 171 172Holding a reference on a dentry ensures that the dentry won't suddenly 173be freed and used for something else, so the values in various fields 174will behave as expected. It also protects the ``->d_inode`` reference 175to the inode to some extent. 176 177The association between a dentry and its inode is fairly permanent. 178For example, when a file is renamed, the dentry and inode move 179together to the new location. When a file is created the dentry will 180initially be negative (i.e. ``d_inode`` is ``NULL``), and will be assigned 181to the new inode as part of the act of creation. 182 183When a file is deleted, this can be reflected in the cache either by 184setting ``d_inode`` to ``NULL``, or by removing it from the hash table 185(described shortly) used to look up the name in the parent directory. 186If the dentry is still in use the second option is used as it is 187perfectly legal to keep using an open file after it has been deleted 188and having the dentry around helps. If the dentry is not otherwise in 189use (i.e. if the refcount in ``d_lockref`` is one), only then will 190``d_inode`` be set to ``NULL``. Doing it this way is more efficient for a 191very common case. 192 193So as long as a counted reference is held to a dentry, a non-``NULL`` ``->d_inode`` 194value will never be changed. 195 196dentry->d_lock 197~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 198 199``d_lock`` is a synonym for the spinlock that is part of ``d_lockref`` above. 200For our purposes, holding this lock protects against the dentry being 201renamed or unlinked. In particular, its parent (``d_parent``), and its 202name (``d_name``) cannot be changed, and it cannot be removed from the 203dentry hash table. 204 205When looking for a name in a directory, REF-walk takes ``d_lock`` on 206each candidate dentry that it finds in the hash table and then checks 207that the parent and name are correct. So it doesn't lock the parent 208while searching in the cache; it only locks children. 209 210When looking for the parent for a given name (to handle "``..``"), 211REF-walk can take ``d_lock`` to get a stable reference to ``d_parent``, 212but it first tries a more lightweight approach. As seen in 213``dget_parent()``, if a reference can be claimed on the parent, and if 214subsequently ``d_parent`` can be seen to have not changed, then there is 215no need to actually take the lock on the child. 216 217rename_lock 218~~~~~~~~~~~ 219 220Looking up a given name in a given directory involves computing a hash 221from the two values (the name and the dentry of the directory), 222accessing that slot in a hash table, and searching the linked list 223that is found there. 224 225When a dentry is renamed, the name and the parent dentry can both 226change so the hash will almost certainly change too. This would move the 227dentry to a different chain in the hash table. If a filename search 228happened to be looking at a dentry that was moved in this way, 229it might end up continuing the search down the wrong chain, 230and so miss out on part of the correct chain. 231 232The name-lookup process (``d_lookup()``) does _not_ try to prevent this 233from happening, but only to detect when it happens. 234``rename_lock`` is a seqlock that is updated whenever any dentry is 235renamed. If ``d_lookup`` finds that a rename happened while it 236unsuccessfully scanned a chain in the hash table, it simply tries 237again. 238 239``rename_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks 240against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where 241the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()`` 242check). If ``rename_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters 243a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with 244``-EAGAIN``. 245 246inode->i_rwsem 247~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 248 249``i_rwsem`` is a read/write semaphore that serializes all changes to a particular 250directory. This ensures that, for example, an ``unlink()`` and a ``rename()`` 251cannot both happen at the same time. It also keeps the directory 252stable while the filesystem is asked to look up a name that is not 253currently in the dcache or, optionally, when the list of entries in a 254directory is being retrieved with ``readdir()``. 255 256This has a complementary role to that of ``d_lock``: ``i_rwsem`` on a 257directory protects all of the names in that directory, while ``d_lock`` 258on a name protects just one name in a directory. Most changes to the 259dcache hold ``i_rwsem`` on the relevant directory inode and briefly take 260``d_lock`` on one or more the dentries while the change happens. One 261exception is when idle dentries are removed from the dcache due to 262memory pressure. This uses ``d_lock``, but ``i_rwsem`` plays no role. 263 264The semaphore affects pathname lookup in two distinct ways. Firstly it 265prevents changes during lookup of a name in a directory. ``walk_component()`` uses 266``lookup_fast()`` first which, in turn, checks to see if the name is in the cache, 267using only ``d_lock`` locking. If the name isn't found, then ``walk_component()`` 268falls back to ``lookup_slow()`` which takes a shared lock on ``i_rwsem``, checks again that 269the name isn't in the cache, and then calls in to the filesystem to get a 270definitive answer. A new dentry will be added to the cache regardless of 271the result. 272 273Secondly, when pathname lookup reaches the final component, it will 274sometimes need to take an exclusive lock on ``i_rwsem`` before performing the last lookup so 275that the required exclusion can be achieved. How path lookup chooses 276to take, or not take, ``i_rwsem`` is one of the 277issues addressed in a subsequent section. 278 279If two threads attempt to look up the same name at the same time - a 280name that is not yet in the dcache - the shared lock on ``i_rwsem`` will 281not prevent them both adding new dentries with the same name. As this 282would result in confusion an extra level of interlocking is used, 283based around a secondary hash table (``in_lookup_hashtable``) and a 284per-dentry flag bit (``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``). 285 286To add a new dentry to the cache while only holding a shared lock on 287``i_rwsem``, a thread must call ``d_alloc_parallel()``. This allocates a 288dentry, stores the required name and parent in it, checks if there 289is already a matching dentry in the primary or secondary hash 290tables, and if not, stores the newly allocated dentry in the secondary 291hash table, with ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` set. 292 293If a matching dentry was found in the primary hash table then that is 294returned and the caller can know that it lost a race with some other 295thread adding the entry. If no matching dentry is found in either 296cache, the newly allocated dentry is returned and the caller can 297detect this from the presence of ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``. In this case it 298knows that it has won any race and now is responsible for asking the 299filesystem to perform the lookup and find the matching inode. When 300the lookup is complete, it must call ``d_lookup_done()`` which clears 301the flag and does some other house keeping, including removing the 302dentry from the secondary hash table - it will normally have been 303added to the primary hash table already. Note that a ``struct 304waitqueue_head`` is passed to ``d_alloc_parallel()``, and 305``d_lookup_done()`` must be called while this ``waitqueue_head`` is still 306in scope. 307 308If a matching dentry is found in the secondary hash table, 309``d_alloc_parallel()`` has a little more work to do. It first waits for 310``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` to be cleared, using a wait_queue that was passed 311to the instance of ``d_alloc_parallel()`` that won the race and that 312will be woken by the call to ``d_lookup_done()``. It then checks to see 313if the dentry has now been added to the primary hash table. If it 314has, the dentry is returned and the caller just sees that it lost any 315race. If it hasn't been added to the primary hash table, the most 316likely explanation is that some other dentry was added instead using 317``d_splice_alias()``. In any case, ``d_alloc_parallel()`` repeats all the 318look ups from the start and will normally return something from the 319primary hash table. 320 321mnt->mnt_count 322~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 323 324``mnt_count`` is a per-CPU reference counter on "``mount``" structures. 325Per-CPU here means that incrementing the count is cheap as it only 326uses CPU-local memory, but checking if the count is zero is expensive as 327it needs to check with every CPU. Taking a ``mnt_count`` reference 328prevents the mount structure from disappearing as the result of regular 329unmount operations, but does not prevent a "lazy" unmount. So holding 330``mnt_count`` doesn't ensure that the mount remains in the namespace and, 331in particular, doesn't stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry. It 332does, however, ensure that the ``mount`` data structure remains coherent, 333and it provides a reference to the root dentry of the mounted 334filesystem. So a reference through ``->mnt_count`` provides a stable 335reference to the mounted dentry, but not the mounted-on dentry. 336 337mount_lock 338~~~~~~~~~~ 339 340``mount_lock`` is a global seqlock, a bit like ``rename_lock``. It can be used to 341check if any change has been made to any mount points. 342 343While walking down the tree (away from the root) this lock is used when 344crossing a mount point to check that the crossing was safe. That is, 345the value in the seqlock is read, then the code finds the mount that 346is mounted on the current directory, if there is one, and increments 347the ``mnt_count``. Finally the value in ``mount_lock`` is checked against 348the old value. If there is no change, then the crossing was safe. If there 349was a change, the ``mnt_count`` is decremented and the whole process is 350retried. 351 352When walking up the tree (towards the root) by following a ".." link, 353a little more care is needed. In this case the seqlock (which 354contains both a counter and a spinlock) is fully locked to prevent 355any changes to any mount points while stepping up. This locking is 356needed to stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry, which the 357refcount on the mount itself doesn't ensure. 358 359``mount_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks 360against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where 361the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()`` 362check). If ``mount_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters 363a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with 364``-EAGAIN``. 365 366RCU 367~~~ 368 369Finally the global (but extremely lightweight) RCU read lock is held 370from time to time to ensure certain data structures don't get freed 371unexpectedly. 372 373In particular it is held while scanning chains in the dcache hash 374table, and the mount point hash table. 375 376Bringing it together with ``struct nameidata`` 377---------------------------------------------- 378 379.. _First edition Unix: http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V1/u2.s 380 381Throughout the process of walking a path, the current status is stored 382in a ``struct nameidata``, "namei" being the traditional name - dating 383all the way back to `First Edition Unix`_ - of the function that 384converts a "name" to an "inode". ``struct nameidata`` contains (among 385other fields): 386 387``struct path path`` 388~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 389 390A ``path`` contains a ``struct vfsmount`` (which is 391embedded in a ``struct mount``) and a ``struct dentry``. Together these 392record the current status of the walk. They start out referring to the 393starting point (the current working directory, the root directory, or some other 394directory identified by a file descriptor), and are updated on each 395step. A reference through ``d_lockref`` and ``mnt_count`` is always 396held. 397 398``struct qstr last`` 399~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 400 401This is a string together with a length (i.e. _not_ ``nul`` terminated) 402that is the "next" component in the pathname. 403 404``int last_type`` 405~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 406 407This is one of ``LAST_NORM``, ``LAST_ROOT``, ``LAST_DOT``, ``LAST_DOTDOT``, or 408``LAST_BIND``. The ``last`` field is only valid if the type is 409``LAST_NORM``. ``LAST_BIND`` is used when following a symlink and no 410components of the symlink have been processed yet. Others should be 411fairly self-explanatory. 412 413``struct path root`` 414~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 415 416This is used to hold a reference to the effective root of the 417filesystem. Often that reference won't be needed, so this field is 418only assigned the first time it is used, or when a non-standard root 419is requested. Keeping a reference in the ``nameidata`` ensures that 420only one root is in effect for the entire path walk, even if it races 421with a ``chroot()`` system call. 422 423It should be noted that in the case of ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` or 424``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, the effective root becomes the directory file descriptor 425passed to ``openat2()`` (which exposes these ``LOOKUP_`` flags). 426 427The root is needed when either of two conditions holds: (1) either the 428pathname or a symbolic link starts with a "'/'", or (2) a "``..``" 429component is being handled, since "``..``" from the root must always stay 430at the root. The value used is usually the current root directory of 431the calling process. An alternate root can be provided as when 432``sysctl()`` calls ``file_open_root()``, and when NFSv4 or Btrfs call 433``mount_subtree()``. In each case a pathname is being looked up in a very 434specific part of the filesystem, and the lookup must not be allowed to 435escape that subtree. It works a bit like a local ``chroot()``. 436 437Ignoring the handling of symbolic links, we can now describe the 438"``link_path_walk()``" function, which handles the lookup of everything 439except the final component as: 440 441 Given a path (``name``) and a nameidata structure (``nd``), check that the 442 current directory has execute permission and then advance ``name`` 443 over one component while updating ``last_type`` and ``last``. If that 444 was the final component, then return, otherwise call 445 ``walk_component()`` and repeat from the top. 446 447``walk_component()`` is even easier. If the component is ``LAST_DOTS``, 448it calls ``handle_dots()`` which does the necessary locking as already 449described. If it finds a ``LAST_NORM`` component it first calls 450"``lookup_fast()``" which only looks in the dcache, but will ask the 451filesystem to revalidate the result if it is that sort of filesystem. 452If that doesn't get a good result, it calls "``lookup_slow()``" which 453takes ``i_rwsem``, rechecks the cache, and then asks the filesystem 454to find a definitive answer. Each of these will call 455``follow_managed()`` (as described below) to handle any mount points. 456 457In the absence of symbolic links, ``walk_component()`` creates a new 458``struct path`` containing a counted reference to the new dentry and a 459reference to the new ``vfsmount`` which is only counted if it is 460different from the previous ``vfsmount``. It then calls 461``path_to_nameidata()`` to install the new ``struct path`` in the 462``struct nameidata`` and drop the unneeded references. 463 464This "hand-over-hand" sequencing of getting a reference to the new 465dentry before dropping the reference to the previous dentry may 466seem obvious, but is worth pointing out so that we will recognize its 467analogue in the "RCU-walk" version. 468 469Handling the final component 470---------------------------- 471 472``link_path_walk()`` only walks as far as setting ``nd->last`` and 473``nd->last_type`` to refer to the final component of the path. It does 474not call ``walk_component()`` that last time. Handling that final 475component remains for the caller to sort out. Those callers are 476``path_lookupat()``, ``path_parentat()``, ``path_mountpoint()`` and 477``path_openat()`` each of which handles the differing requirements of 478different system calls. 479 480``path_parentat()`` is clearly the simplest - it just wraps a little bit 481of housekeeping around ``link_path_walk()`` and returns the parent 482directory and final component to the caller. The caller will be either 483aiming to create a name (via ``filename_create()``) or remove or rename 484a name (in which case ``user_path_parent()`` is used). They will use 485``i_rwsem`` to exclude other changes while they validate and then 486perform their operation. 487 488``path_lookupat()`` is nearly as simple - it is used when an existing 489object is wanted such as by ``stat()`` or ``chmod()``. It essentially just 490calls ``walk_component()`` on the final component through a call to 491``lookup_last()``. ``path_lookupat()`` returns just the final dentry. 492 493``path_mountpoint()`` handles the special case of unmounting which must 494not try to revalidate the mounted filesystem. It effectively 495contains, through a call to ``mountpoint_last()``, an alternate 496implementation of ``lookup_slow()`` which skips that step. This is 497important when unmounting a filesystem that is inaccessible, such as 498one provided by a dead NFS server. 499 500Finally ``path_openat()`` is used for the ``open()`` system call; it 501contains, in support functions starting with "``do_last()``", all the 502complexity needed to handle the different subtleties of O_CREAT (with 503or without O_EXCL), final "``/``" characters, and trailing symbolic 504links. We will revisit this in the final part of this series, which 505focuses on those symbolic links. "``do_last()``" will sometimes, but 506not always, take ``i_rwsem``, depending on what it finds. 507 508Each of these, or the functions which call them, need to be alert to 509the possibility that the final component is not ``LAST_NORM``. If the 510goal of the lookup is to create something, then any value for 511``last_type`` other than ``LAST_NORM`` will result in an error. For 512example if ``path_parentat()`` reports ``LAST_DOTDOT``, then the caller 513won't try to create that name. They also check for trailing slashes 514by testing ``last.name[last.len]``. If there is any character beyond 515the final component, it must be a trailing slash. 516 517Revalidation and automounts 518--------------------------- 519 520Apart from symbolic links, there are only two parts of the "REF-walk" 521process not yet covered. One is the handling of stale cache entries 522and the other is automounts. 523 524On filesystems that require it, the lookup routines will call the 525``->d_revalidate()`` dentry method to ensure that the cached information 526is current. This will often confirm validity or update a few details 527from a server. In some cases it may find that there has been change 528further up the path and that something that was thought to be valid 529previously isn't really. When this happens the lookup of the whole 530path is aborted and retried with the "``LOOKUP_REVAL``" flag set. This 531forces revalidation to be more thorough. We will see more details of 532this retry process in the next article. 533 534Automount points are locations in the filesystem where an attempt to 535lookup a name can trigger changes to how that lookup should be 536handled, in particular by mounting a filesystem there. These are 537covered in greater detail in autofs.txt in the Linux documentation 538tree, but a few notes specifically related to path lookup are in order 539here. 540 541The Linux VFS has a concept of "managed" dentries which is reflected 542in function names such as "``follow_managed()``". There are three 543potentially interesting things about these dentries corresponding 544to three different flags that might be set in ``dentry->d_flags``: 545 546``DCACHE_MANAGE_TRANSIT`` 547~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 548 549If this flag has been set, then the filesystem has requested that the 550``d_manage()`` dentry operation be called before handling any possible 551mount point. This can perform two particular services: 552 553It can block to avoid races. If an automount point is being 554unmounted, the ``d_manage()`` function will usually wait for that 555process to complete before letting the new lookup proceed and possibly 556trigger a new automount. 557 558It can selectively allow only some processes to transit through a 559mount point. When a server process is managing automounts, it may 560need to access a directory without triggering normal automount 561processing. That server process can identify itself to the ``autofs`` 562filesystem, which will then give it a special pass through 563``d_manage()`` by returning ``-EISDIR``. 564 565``DCACHE_MOUNTED`` 566~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 567 568This flag is set on every dentry that is mounted on. As Linux 569supports multiple filesystem namespaces, it is possible that the 570dentry may not be mounted on in *this* namespace, just in some 571other. So this flag is seen as a hint, not a promise. 572 573If this flag is set, and ``d_manage()`` didn't return ``-EISDIR``, 574``lookup_mnt()`` is called to examine the mount hash table (honoring the 575``mount_lock`` described earlier) and possibly return a new ``vfsmount`` 576and a new ``dentry`` (both with counted references). 577 578``DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT`` 579~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 580 581If ``d_manage()`` allowed us to get this far, and ``lookup_mnt()`` didn't 582find a mount point, then this flag causes the ``d_automount()`` dentry 583operation to be called. 584 585The ``d_automount()`` operation can be arbitrarily complex and may 586communicate with server processes etc. but it should ultimately either 587report that there was an error, that there was nothing to mount, or 588should provide an updated ``struct path`` with new ``dentry`` and ``vfsmount``. 589 590In the latter case, ``finish_automount()`` will be called to safely 591install the new mount point into the mount table. 592 593There is no new locking of import here and it is important that no 594locks (only counted references) are held over this processing due to 595the very real possibility of extended delays. 596This will become more important next time when we examine RCU-walk 597which is particularly sensitive to delays. 598 599RCU-walk - faster pathname lookup in Linux 600========================================== 601 602RCU-walk is another algorithm for performing pathname lookup in Linux. 603It is in many ways similar to REF-walk and the two share quite a bit 604of code. The significant difference in RCU-walk is how it allows for 605the possibility of concurrent access. 606 607We noted that REF-walk is complex because there are numerous details 608and special cases. RCU-walk reduces this complexity by simply 609refusing to handle a number of cases -- it instead falls back to 610REF-walk. The difficulty with RCU-walk comes from a different 611direction: unfamiliarity. The locking rules when depending on RCU are 612quite different from traditional locking, so we will spend a little extra 613time when we come to those. 614 615Clear demarcation of roles 616-------------------------- 617 618The easiest way to manage concurrency is to forcibly stop any other 619thread from changing the data structures that a given thread is 620looking at. In cases where no other thread would even think of 621changing the data and lots of different threads want to read at the 622same time, this can be very costly. Even when using locks that permit 623multiple concurrent readers, the simple act of updating the count of 624the number of current readers can impose an unwanted cost. So the 625goal when reading a shared data structure that no other process is 626changing is to avoid writing anything to memory at all. Take no 627locks, increment no counts, leave no footprints. 628 629The REF-walk mechanism already described certainly doesn't follow this 630principle, but then it is really designed to work when there may well 631be other threads modifying the data. RCU-walk, in contrast, is 632designed for the common situation where there are lots of frequent 633readers and only occasional writers. This may not be common in all 634parts of the filesystem tree, but in many parts it will be. For the 635other parts it is important that RCU-walk can quickly fall back to 636using REF-walk. 637 638Pathname lookup always starts in RCU-walk mode but only remains there 639as long as what it is looking for is in the cache and is stable. It 640dances lightly down the cached filesystem image, leaving no footprints 641and carefully watching where it is, to be sure it doesn't trip. If it 642notices that something has changed or is changing, or if something 643isn't in the cache, then it tries to stop gracefully and switch to 644REF-walk. 645 646This stopping requires getting a counted reference on the current 647``vfsmount`` and ``dentry``, and ensuring that these are still valid - 648that a path walk with REF-walk would have found the same entries. 649This is an invariant that RCU-walk must guarantee. It can only make 650decisions, such as selecting the next step, that are decisions which 651REF-walk could also have made if it were walking down the tree at the 652same time. If the graceful stop succeeds, the rest of the path is 653processed with the reliable, if slightly sluggish, REF-walk. If 654RCU-walk finds it cannot stop gracefully, it simply gives up and 655restarts from the top with REF-walk. 656 657This pattern of "try RCU-walk, if that fails try REF-walk" can be 658clearly seen in functions like ``filename_lookup()``, 659``filename_parentat()``, ``filename_mountpoint()``, 660``do_filp_open()``, and ``do_file_open_root()``. These five 661correspond roughly to the four ``path_``* functions we met earlier, 662each of which calls ``link_path_walk()``. The ``path_*`` functions are 663called using different mode flags until a mode is found which works. 664They are first called with ``LOOKUP_RCU`` set to request "RCU-walk". If 665that fails with the error ``ECHILD`` they are called again with no 666special flag to request "REF-walk". If either of those report the 667error ``ESTALE`` a final attempt is made with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` set (and no 668``LOOKUP_RCU``) to ensure that entries found in the cache are forcibly 669revalidated - normally entries are only revalidated if the filesystem 670determines that they are too old to trust. 671 672The ``LOOKUP_RCU`` attempt may drop that flag internally and switch to 673REF-walk, but will never then try to switch back to RCU-walk. Places 674that trip up RCU-walk are much more likely to be near the leaves and 675so it is very unlikely that there will be much, if any, benefit from 676switching back. 677 678RCU and seqlocks: fast and light 679-------------------------------- 680 681RCU is, unsurprisingly, critical to RCU-walk mode. The 682``rcu_read_lock()`` is held for the entire time that RCU-walk is walking 683down a path. The particular guarantee it provides is that the key 684data structures - dentries, inodes, super_blocks, and mounts - will 685not be freed while the lock is held. They might be unlinked or 686invalidated in one way or another, but the memory will not be 687repurposed so values in various fields will still be meaningful. This 688is the only guarantee that RCU provides; everything else is done using 689seqlocks. 690 691As we saw above, REF-walk holds a counted reference to the current 692dentry and the current vfsmount, and does not release those references 693before taking references to the "next" dentry or vfsmount. It also 694sometimes takes the ``d_lock`` spinlock. These references and locks are 695taken to prevent certain changes from happening. RCU-walk must not 696take those references or locks and so cannot prevent such changes. 697Instead, it checks to see if a change has been made, and aborts or 698retries if it has. 699 700To preserve the invariant mentioned above (that RCU-walk may only make 701decisions that REF-walk could have made), it must make the checks at 702or near the same places that REF-walk holds the references. So, when 703REF-walk increments a reference count or takes a spinlock, RCU-walk 704samples the status of a seqlock using ``read_seqcount_begin()`` or a 705similar function. When REF-walk decrements the count or drops the 706lock, RCU-walk checks if the sampled status is still valid using 707``read_seqcount_retry()`` or similar. 708 709However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that. If 710RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected 711structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a priori 712guarantee of any consistency between those accesses. When consistency 713is needed - which it usually is - RCU-walk must take a copy and then 714use ``read_seqcount_retry()`` to validate that copy. 715 716``read_seqcount_retry()`` not only checks the sequence number, but also 717imposes a memory barrier so that no memory-read instruction from 718*before* the call can be delayed until *after* the call, either by the 719CPU or by the compiler. A simple example of this can be seen in 720``slow_dentry_cmp()`` which, for filesystems which do not use simple 721byte-wise name equality, calls into the filesystem to compare a name 722against a dentry. The length and name pointer are copied into local 723variables, then ``read_seqcount_retry()`` is called to confirm the two 724are consistent, and only then is ``->d_compare()`` called. When 725standard filename comparison is used, ``dentry_cmp()`` is called 726instead. Notably it does _not_ use ``read_seqcount_retry()``, but 727instead has a large comment explaining why the consistency guarantee 728isn't necessary. A subsequent ``read_seqcount_retry()`` will be 729sufficient to catch any problem that could occur at this point. 730 731With that little refresher on seqlocks out of the way we can look at 732the bigger picture of how RCU-walk uses seqlocks. 733 734``mount_lock`` and ``nd->m_seq`` 735~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 736 737We already met the ``mount_lock`` seqlock when REF-walk used it to 738ensure that crossing a mount point is performed safely. RCU-walk uses 739it for that too, but for quite a bit more. 740 741Instead of taking a counted reference to each ``vfsmount`` as it 742descends the tree, RCU-walk samples the state of ``mount_lock`` at the 743start of the walk and stores this initial sequence number in the 744``struct nameidata`` in the ``m_seq`` field. This one lock and one 745sequence number are used to validate all accesses to all ``vfsmounts``, 746and all mount point crossings. As changes to the mount table are 747relatively rare, it is reasonable to fall back on REF-walk any time 748that any "mount" or "unmount" happens. 749 750``m_seq`` is checked (using ``read_seqretry()``) at the end of an RCU-walk 751sequence, whether switching to REF-walk for the rest of the path or 752when the end of the path is reached. It is also checked when stepping 753down over a mount point (in ``__follow_mount_rcu()``) or up (in 754``follow_dotdot_rcu()``). If it is ever found to have changed, the 755whole RCU-walk sequence is aborted and the path is processed again by 756REF-walk. 757 758If RCU-walk finds that ``mount_lock`` hasn't changed then it can be sure 759that, had REF-walk taken counted references on each vfsmount, the 760results would have been the same. This ensures the invariant holds, 761at least for vfsmount structures. 762 763``dentry->d_seq`` and ``nd->seq`` 764~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 765 766In place of taking a count or lock on ``d_reflock``, RCU-walk samples 767the per-dentry ``d_seq`` seqlock, and stores the sequence number in the 768``seq`` field of the nameidata structure, so ``nd->seq`` should always be 769the current sequence number of ``nd->dentry``. This number needs to be 770revalidated after copying, and before using, the name, parent, or 771inode of the dentry. 772 773The handling of the name we have already looked at, and the parent is 774only accessed in ``follow_dotdot_rcu()`` which fairly trivially follows 775the required pattern, though it does so for three different cases. 776 777When not at a mount point, ``d_parent`` is followed and its ``d_seq`` is 778collected. When we are at a mount point, we instead follow the 779``mnt->mnt_mountpoint`` link to get a new dentry and collect its 780``d_seq``. Then, after finally finding a ``d_parent`` to follow, we must 781check if we have landed on a mount point and, if so, must find that 782mount point and follow the ``mnt->mnt_root`` link. This would imply a 783somewhat unusual, but certainly possible, circumstance where the 784starting point of the path lookup was in part of the filesystem that 785was mounted on, and so not visible from the root. 786 787The inode pointer, stored in ``->d_inode``, is a little more 788interesting. The inode will always need to be accessed at least 789twice, once to determine if it is NULL and once to verify access 790permissions. Symlink handling requires a validated inode pointer too. 791Rather than revalidating on each access, a copy is made on the first 792access and it is stored in the ``inode`` field of ``nameidata`` from where 793it can be safely accessed without further validation. 794 795``lookup_fast()`` is the only lookup routine that is used in RCU-mode, 796``lookup_slow()`` being too slow and requiring locks. It is in 797``lookup_fast()`` that we find the important "hand over hand" tracking 798of the current dentry. 799 800The current ``dentry`` and current ``seq`` number are passed to 801``__d_lookup_rcu()`` which, on success, returns a new ``dentry`` and a 802new ``seq`` number. ``lookup_fast()`` then copies the inode pointer and 803revalidates the new ``seq`` number. It then validates the old ``dentry`` 804with the old ``seq`` number one last time and only then continues. This 805process of getting the ``seq`` number of the new dentry and then 806checking the ``seq`` number of the old exactly mirrors the process of 807getting a counted reference to the new dentry before dropping that for 808the old dentry which we saw in REF-walk. 809 810No ``inode->i_rwsem`` or even ``rename_lock`` 811~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 812 813A semaphore is a fairly heavyweight lock that can only be taken when it is 814permissible to sleep. As ``rcu_read_lock()`` forbids sleeping, 815``inode->i_rwsem`` plays no role in RCU-walk. If some other thread does 816take ``i_rwsem`` and modifies the directory in a way that RCU-walk needs 817to notice, the result will be either that RCU-walk fails to find the 818dentry that it is looking for, or it will find a dentry which 819``read_seqretry()`` won't validate. In either case it will drop down to 820REF-walk mode which can take whatever locks are needed. 821 822Though ``rename_lock`` could be used by RCU-walk as it doesn't require 823any sleeping, RCU-walk doesn't bother. REF-walk uses ``rename_lock`` to 824protect against the possibility of hash chains in the dcache changing 825while they are being searched. This can result in failing to find 826something that actually is there. When RCU-walk fails to find 827something in the dentry cache, whether it is really there or not, it 828already drops down to REF-walk and tries again with appropriate 829locking. This neatly handles all cases, so adding extra checks on 830rename_lock would bring no significant value. 831 832``unlazy walk()`` and ``complete_walk()`` 833----------------------------------------- 834 835That "dropping down to REF-walk" typically involves a call to 836``unlazy_walk()``, so named because "RCU-walk" is also sometimes 837referred to as "lazy walk". ``unlazy_walk()`` is called when 838following the path down to the current vfsmount/dentry pair seems to 839have proceeded successfully, but the next step is problematic. This 840can happen if the next name cannot be found in the dcache, if 841permission checking or name revalidation couldn't be achieved while 842the ``rcu_read_lock()`` is held (which forbids sleeping), if an 843automount point is found, or in a couple of cases involving symlinks. 844It is also called from ``complete_walk()`` when the lookup has reached 845the final component, or the very end of the path, depending on which 846particular flavor of lookup is used. 847 848Other reasons for dropping out of RCU-walk that do not trigger a call 849to ``unlazy_walk()`` are when some inconsistency is found that cannot be 850handled immediately, such as ``mount_lock`` or one of the ``d_seq`` 851seqlocks reporting a change. In these cases the relevant function 852will return ``-ECHILD`` which will percolate up until it triggers a new 853attempt from the top using REF-walk. 854 855For those cases where ``unlazy_walk()`` is an option, it essentially 856takes a reference on each of the pointers that it holds (vfsmount, 857dentry, and possibly some symbolic links) and then verifies that the 858relevant seqlocks have not been changed. If there have been changes, 859it, too, aborts with ``-ECHILD``, otherwise the transition to REF-walk 860has been a success and the lookup process continues. 861 862Taking a reference on those pointers is not quite as simple as just 863incrementing a counter. That works to take a second reference if you 864already have one (often indirectly through another object), but it 865isn't sufficient if you don't actually have a counted reference at 866all. For ``dentry->d_lockref``, it is safe to increment the reference 867counter to get a reference unless it has been explicitly marked as 868"dead" which involves setting the counter to ``-128``. 869``lockref_get_not_dead()`` achieves this. 870 871For ``mnt->mnt_count`` it is safe to take a reference as long as 872``mount_lock`` is then used to validate the reference. If that 873validation fails, it may *not* be safe to just drop that reference in 874the standard way of calling ``mnt_put()`` - an unmount may have 875progressed too far. So the code in ``legitimize_mnt()``, when it 876finds that the reference it got might not be safe, checks the 877``MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT`` flag to determine if a simple ``mnt_put()`` is 878correct, or if it should just decrement the count and pretend none of 879this ever happened. 880 881Taking care in filesystems 882-------------------------- 883 884RCU-walk depends almost entirely on cached information and often will 885not call into the filesystem at all. However there are two places, 886besides the already-mentioned component-name comparison, where the 887file system might be included in RCU-walk, and it must know to be 888careful. 889 890If the filesystem has non-standard permission-checking requirements - 891such as a networked filesystem which may need to check with the server 892- the ``i_op->permission`` interface might be called during RCU-walk. 893In this case an extra "``MAY_NOT_BLOCK``" flag is passed so that it 894knows not to sleep, but to return ``-ECHILD`` if it cannot complete 895promptly. ``i_op->permission`` is given the inode pointer, not the 896dentry, so it doesn't need to worry about further consistency checks. 897However if it accesses any other filesystem data structures, it must 898ensure they are safe to be accessed with only the ``rcu_read_lock()`` 899held. This typically means they must be freed using ``kfree_rcu()`` or 900similar. 901 902.. _READ_ONCE: https://lwn.net/Articles/624126/ 903 904If the filesystem may need to revalidate dcache entries, then 905``d_op->d_revalidate`` may be called in RCU-walk too. This interface 906*is* passed the dentry but does not have access to the ``inode`` or the 907``seq`` number from the ``nameidata``, so it needs to be extra careful 908when accessing fields in the dentry. This "extra care" typically 909involves using `READ_ONCE() <READ_ONCE_>`_ to access fields, and verifying the 910result is not NULL before using it. This pattern can be seen in 911``nfs_lookup_revalidate()``. 912 913A pair of patterns 914------------------ 915 916In various places in the details of REF-walk and RCU-walk, and also in 917the big picture, there are a couple of related patterns that are worth 918being aware of. 919 920The first is "try quickly and check, if that fails try slowly". We 921can see that in the high-level approach of first trying RCU-walk and 922then trying REF-walk, and in places where ``unlazy_walk()`` is used to 923switch to REF-walk for the rest of the path. We also saw it earlier 924in ``dget_parent()`` when following a "``..``" link. It tries a quick way 925to get a reference, then falls back to taking locks if needed. 926 927The second pattern is "try quickly and check, if that fails try 928again - repeatedly". This is seen with the use of ``rename_lock`` and 929``mount_lock`` in REF-walk. RCU-walk doesn't make use of this pattern - 930if anything goes wrong it is much safer to just abort and try a more 931sedate approach. 932 933The emphasis here is "try quickly and check". It should probably be 934"try quickly _and carefully,_ then check". The fact that checking is 935needed is a reminder that the system is dynamic and only a limited 936number of things are safe at all. The most likely cause of errors in 937this whole process is assuming something is safe when in reality it 938isn't. Careful consideration of what exactly guarantees the safety of 939each access is sometimes necessary. 940 941A walk among the symlinks 942========================= 943 944There are several basic issues that we will examine to understand the 945handling of symbolic links: the symlink stack, together with cache 946lifetimes, will help us understand the overall recursive handling of 947symlinks and lead to the special care needed for the final component. 948Then a consideration of access-time updates and summary of the various 949flags controlling lookup will finish the story. 950 951The symlink stack 952----------------- 953 954There are only two sorts of filesystem objects that can usefully 955appear in a path prior to the final component: directories and symlinks. 956Handling directories is quite straightforward: the new directory 957simply becomes the starting point at which to interpret the next 958component on the path. Handling symbolic links requires a bit more 959work. 960 961Conceptually, symbolic links could be handled by editing the path. If 962a component name refers to a symbolic link, then that component is 963replaced by the body of the link and, if that body starts with a '/', 964then all preceding parts of the path are discarded. This is what the 965"``readlink -f``" command does, though it also edits out "``.``" and 966"``..``" components. 967 968Directly editing the path string is not really necessary when looking 969up a path, and discarding early components is pointless as they aren't 970looked at anyway. Keeping track of all remaining components is 971important, but they can of course be kept separately; there is no need 972to concatenate them. As one symlink may easily refer to another, 973which in turn can refer to a third, we may need to keep the remaining 974components of several paths, each to be processed when the preceding 975ones are completed. These path remnants are kept on a stack of 976limited size. 977 978There are two reasons for placing limits on how many symlinks can 979occur in a single path lookup. The most obvious is to avoid loops. 980If a symlink referred to itself either directly or through 981intermediaries, then following the symlink can never complete 982successfully - the error ``ELOOP`` must be returned. Loops can be 983detected without imposing limits, but limits are the simplest solution 984and, given the second reason for restriction, quite sufficient. 985 986.. _outlined recently: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1934390/focus=1934550 987 988The second reason was `outlined recently`_ by Linus: 989 990 Because it's a latency and DoS issue too. We need to react well to 991 true loops, but also to "very deep" non-loops. It's not about memory 992 use, it's about users triggering unreasonable CPU resources. 993 994Linux imposes a limit on the length of any pathname: ``PATH_MAX``, which 995is 4096. There are a number of reasons for this limit; not letting the 996kernel spend too much time on just one path is one of them. With 997symbolic links you can effectively generate much longer paths so some 998sort of limit is needed for the same reason. Linux imposes a limit of 999at most 40 symlinks in any one path lookup. It previously imposed a 1000further limit of eight on the maximum depth of recursion, but that was 1001raised to 40 when a separate stack was implemented, so there is now 1002just the one limit. 1003 1004The ``nameidata`` structure that we met in an earlier article contains a 1005small stack that can be used to store the remaining part of up to two 1006symlinks. In many cases this will be sufficient. If it isn't, a 1007separate stack is allocated with room for 40 symlinks. Pathname 1008lookup will never exceed that stack as, once the 40th symlink is 1009detected, an error is returned. 1010 1011It might seem that the name remnants are all that needs to be stored on 1012this stack, but we need a bit more. To see that, we need to move on to 1013cache lifetimes. 1014 1015Storage and lifetime of cached symlinks 1016--------------------------------------- 1017 1018Like other filesystem resources, such as inodes and directory 1019entries, symlinks are cached by Linux to avoid repeated costly access 1020to external storage. It is particularly important for RCU-walk to be 1021able to find and temporarily hold onto these cached entries, so that 1022it doesn't need to drop down into REF-walk. 1023 1024.. _object-oriented design pattern: https://lwn.net/Articles/446317/ 1025 1026While each filesystem is free to make its own choice, symlinks are 1027typically stored in one of two places. Short symlinks are often 1028stored directly in the inode. When a filesystem allocates a ``struct 1029inode`` it typically allocates extra space to store private data (a 1030common `object-oriented design pattern`_ in the kernel). This will 1031sometimes include space for a symlink. The other common location is 1032in the page cache, which normally stores the content of files. The 1033pathname in a symlink can be seen as the content of that symlink and 1034can easily be stored in the page cache just like file content. 1035 1036When neither of these is suitable, the next most likely scenario is 1037that the filesystem will allocate some temporary memory and copy or 1038construct the symlink content into that memory whenever it is needed. 1039 1040When the symlink is stored in the inode, it has the same lifetime as 1041the inode which, itself, is protected by RCU or by a counted reference 1042on the dentry. This means that the mechanisms that pathname lookup 1043uses to access the dcache and icache (inode cache) safely are quite 1044sufficient for accessing some cached symlinks safely. In these cases, 1045the ``i_link`` pointer in the inode is set to point to wherever the 1046symlink is stored and it can be accessed directly whenever needed. 1047 1048When the symlink is stored in the page cache or elsewhere, the 1049situation is not so straightforward. A reference on a dentry or even 1050on an inode does not imply any reference on cached pages of that 1051inode, and even an ``rcu_read_lock()`` is not sufficient to ensure that 1052a page will not disappear. So for these symlinks the pathname lookup 1053code needs to ask the filesystem to provide a stable reference and, 1054significantly, needs to release that reference when it is finished 1055with it. 1056 1057Taking a reference to a cache page is often possible even in RCU-walk 1058mode. It does require making changes to memory, which is best avoided, 1059but that isn't necessarily a big cost and it is better than dropping 1060out of RCU-walk mode completely. Even filesystems that allocate 1061space to copy the symlink into can use ``GFP_ATOMIC`` to often successfully 1062allocate memory without the need to drop out of RCU-walk. If a 1063filesystem cannot successfully get a reference in RCU-walk mode, it 1064must return ``-ECHILD`` and ``unlazy_walk()`` will be called to return to 1065REF-walk mode in which the filesystem is allowed to sleep. 1066 1067The place for all this to happen is the ``i_op->follow_link()`` inode 1068method. In the present mainline code this is never actually called in 1069RCU-walk mode as the rewrite is not quite complete. It is likely that 1070in a future release this method will be passed an ``inode`` pointer when 1071called in RCU-walk mode so it both (1) knows to be careful, and (2) has the 1072validated pointer. Much like the ``i_op->permission()`` method we 1073looked at previously, ``->follow_link()`` would need to be careful that 1074all the data structures it references are safe to be accessed while 1075holding no counted reference, only the RCU lock. Though getting a 1076reference with ``->follow_link()`` is not yet done in RCU-walk mode, the 1077code is ready to release the reference when that does happen. 1078 1079This need to drop the reference to a symlink adds significant 1080complexity. It requires a reference to the inode so that the 1081``i_op->put_link()`` inode operation can be called. In REF-walk, that 1082reference is kept implicitly through a reference to the dentry, so 1083keeping the ``struct path`` of the symlink is easiest. For RCU-walk, 1084the pointer to the inode is kept separately. To allow switching from 1085RCU-walk back to REF-walk in the middle of processing nested symlinks 1086we also need the seq number for the dentry so we can confirm that 1087switching back was safe. 1088 1089Finally, when providing a reference to a symlink, the filesystem also 1090provides an opaque "cookie" that must be passed to ``->put_link()`` so that it 1091knows what to free. This might be the allocated memory area, or a 1092pointer to the ``struct page`` in the page cache, or something else 1093completely. Only the filesystem knows what it is. 1094 1095In order for the reference to each symlink to be dropped when the walk completes, 1096whether in RCU-walk or REF-walk, the symlink stack needs to contain, 1097along with the path remnants: 1098 1099- the ``struct path`` to provide a reference to the inode in REF-walk 1100- the ``struct inode *`` to provide a reference to the inode in RCU-walk 1101- the ``seq`` to allow the path to be safely switched from RCU-walk to REF-walk 1102- the ``cookie`` that tells ``->put_path()`` what to put. 1103 1104This means that each entry in the symlink stack needs to hold five 1105pointers and an integer instead of just one pointer (the path 1106remnant). On a 64-bit system, this is about 40 bytes per entry; 1107with 40 entries it adds up to 1600 bytes total, which is less than 1108half a page. So it might seem like a lot, but is by no means 1109excessive. 1110 1111Note that, in a given stack frame, the path remnant (``name``) is not 1112part of the symlink that the other fields refer to. It is the remnant 1113to be followed once that symlink has been fully parsed. 1114 1115Following the symlink 1116--------------------- 1117 1118The main loop in ``link_path_walk()`` iterates seamlessly over all 1119components in the path and all of the non-final symlinks. As symlinks 1120are processed, the ``name`` pointer is adjusted to point to a new 1121symlink, or is restored from the stack, so that much of the loop 1122doesn't need to notice. Getting this ``name`` variable on and off the 1123stack is very straightforward; pushing and popping the references is 1124a little more complex. 1125 1126When a symlink is found, ``walk_component()`` returns the value ``1`` 1127(``0`` is returned for any other sort of success, and a negative number 1128is, as usual, an error indicator). This causes ``get_link()`` to be 1129called; it then gets the link from the filesystem. Providing that 1130operation is successful, the old path ``name`` is placed on the stack, 1131and the new value is used as the ``name`` for a while. When the end of 1132the path is found (i.e. ``*name`` is ``'\0'``) the old ``name`` is restored 1133off the stack and path walking continues. 1134 1135Pushing and popping the reference pointers (inode, cookie, etc.) is more 1136complex in part because of the desire to handle tail recursion. When 1137the last component of a symlink itself points to a symlink, we 1138want to pop the symlink-just-completed off the stack before pushing 1139the symlink-just-found to avoid leaving empty path remnants that would 1140just get in the way. 1141 1142It is most convenient to push the new symlink references onto the 1143stack in ``walk_component()`` immediately when the symlink is found; 1144``walk_component()`` is also the last piece of code that needs to look at the 1145old symlink as it walks that last component. So it is quite 1146convenient for ``walk_component()`` to release the old symlink and pop 1147the references just before pushing the reference information for the 1148new symlink. It is guided in this by two flags; ``WALK_GET``, which 1149gives it permission to follow a symlink if it finds one, and 1150``WALK_PUT``, which tells it to release the current symlink after it has been 1151followed. ``WALK_PUT`` is tested first, leading to a call to 1152``put_link()``. ``WALK_GET`` is tested subsequently (by 1153``should_follow_link()``) leading to a call to ``pick_link()`` which sets 1154up the stack frame. 1155 1156Symlinks with no final component 1157~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1158 1159A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation. 1160Both result in a new ``struct path`` (with mount and dentry) being set 1161up in the ``nameidata``, and result in ``get_link()`` returning ``NULL``. 1162 1163The more obvious case is a symlink to "``/``". All symlinks starting 1164with "``/``" are detected in ``get_link()`` which resets the ``nameidata`` 1165to point to the effective filesystem root. If the symlink only 1166contains "``/``" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all, 1167so ``NULL`` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and 1168the stack frame discarded. 1169 1170The other case involves things in ``/proc`` that look like symlinks but 1171aren't really (and are therefore commonly referred to as "magic-links"):: 1172 1173 $ ls -l /proc/self/fd/1 1174 lrwx------ 1 neilb neilb 64 Jun 13 10:19 /proc/self/fd/1 -> /dev/pts/4 1175 1176Every open file descriptor in any process is represented in ``/proc`` by 1177something that looks like a symlink. It is really a reference to the 1178target file, not just the name of it. When you ``readlink`` these 1179objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it 1180has been unlinked or mounted over. When ``walk_component()`` follows 1181one of these, the ``->follow_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return 1182a string name, but instead calls ``nd_jump_link()`` which updates the 1183``nameidata`` in place to point to that target. ``->follow_link()`` then 1184returns ``NULL``. Again there is no final component and ``get_link()`` 1185reports this by leaving the ``last_type`` field of ``nameidata`` as 1186``LAST_BIND``. 1187 1188Following the symlink in the final component 1189-------------------------------------------- 1190 1191All this leads to ``link_path_walk()`` walking down every component, and 1192following all symbolic links it finds, until it reaches the final 1193component. This is just returned in the ``last`` field of ``nameidata``. 1194For some callers, this is all they need; they want to create that 1195``last`` name if it doesn't exist or give an error if it does. Other 1196callers will want to follow a symlink if one is found, and possibly 1197apply special handling to the last component of that symlink, rather 1198than just the last component of the original file name. These callers 1199potentially need to call ``link_path_walk()`` again and again on 1200successive symlinks until one is found that doesn't point to another 1201symlink. 1202 1203This case is handled by the relevant caller of ``link_path_walk()``, such as 1204``path_lookupat()`` using a loop that calls ``link_path_walk()``, and then 1205handles the final component. If the final component is a symlink 1206that needs to be followed, then ``trailing_symlink()`` is called to set 1207things up properly and the loop repeats, calling ``link_path_walk()`` 1208again. This could loop as many as 40 times if the last component of 1209each symlink is another symlink. 1210 1211The various functions that examine the final component and possibly 1212report that it is a symlink are ``lookup_last()``, ``mountpoint_last()`` 1213and ``do_last()``, each of which use the same convention as 1214``walk_component()`` of returning ``1`` if a symlink was found that needs 1215to be followed. 1216 1217Of these, ``do_last()`` is the most interesting as it is used for 1218opening a file. Part of ``do_last()`` runs with ``i_rwsem`` held and this 1219part is in a separate function: ``lookup_open()``. 1220 1221Explaining ``do_last()`` completely is beyond the scope of this article, 1222but a few highlights should help those interested in exploring the 1223code. 1224 12251. Rather than just finding the target file, ``do_last()`` needs to open 1226 it. If the file was found in the dcache, then ``vfs_open()`` is used for 1227 this. If not, then ``lookup_open()`` will either call ``atomic_open()`` (if 1228 the filesystem provides it) to combine the final lookup with the open, or 1229 will perform the separate ``lookup_real()`` and ``vfs_create()`` steps 1230 directly. In the later case the actual "open" of this newly found or 1231 created file will be performed by ``vfs_open()``, just as if the name 1232 were found in the dcache. 1233 12342. ``vfs_open()`` can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information 1235 wasn't quite current enough. Rather than restarting the lookup from 1236 the top with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` set, ``lookup_open()`` is called instead, 1237 giving the filesystem a chance to resolve small inconsistencies. 1238 If that doesn't work, only then is the lookup restarted from the top. 1239 12403. An open with O_CREAT **does** follow a symlink in the final component, 1241 unlike other creation system calls (like ``mkdir``). So the sequence:: 1242 1243 ln -s bar /tmp/foo 1244 echo hello > /tmp/foo 1245 1246 will create a file called ``/tmp/bar``. This is not permitted if 1247 ``O_EXCL`` is set but otherwise is handled for an O_CREAT open much 1248 like for a non-creating open: ``should_follow_link()`` returns ``1``, and 1249 so does ``do_last()`` so that ``trailing_symlink()`` gets called and the 1250 open process continues on the symlink that was found. 1251 1252Updating the access time 1253------------------------ 1254 1255We previously said of RCU-walk that it would "take no locks, increment 1256no counts, leave no footprints." We have since seen that some 1257"footprints" can be needed when handling symlinks as a counted 1258reference (or even a memory allocation) may be needed. But these 1259footprints are best kept to a minimum. 1260 1261One other place where walking down a symlink can involve leaving 1262footprints in a way that doesn't affect directories is in updating access times. 1263In Unix (and Linux) every filesystem object has a "last accessed 1264time", or "``atime``". Passing through a directory to access a file 1265within is not considered to be an access for the purposes of 1266``atime``; only listing the contents of a directory can update its ``atime``. 1267Symlinks are different it seems. Both reading a symlink (with ``readlink()``) 1268and looking up a symlink on the way to some other destination can 1269update the atime on that symlink. 1270 1271.. _clearest statement: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_08 1272 1273It is not clear why this is the case; POSIX has little to say on the 1274subject. The `clearest statement`_ is that, if a particular implementation 1275updates a timestamp in a place not specified by POSIX, this must be 1276documented "except that any changes caused by pathname resolution need 1277not be documented". This seems to imply that POSIX doesn't really 1278care about access-time updates during pathname lookup. 1279 1280.. _Linux 1.3.87: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/diff/fs/ext2/symlink.c?id=f806c6db77b8eaa6e00dcfb6b567706feae8dbb8 1281 1282An examination of history shows that prior to `Linux 1.3.87`_, the ext2 1283filesystem, at least, didn't update atime when following a link. 1284Unfortunately we have no record of why that behavior was changed. 1285 1286In any case, access time must now be updated and that operation can be 1287quite complex. Trying to stay in RCU-walk while doing it is best 1288avoided. Fortunately it is often permitted to skip the ``atime`` 1289update. Because ``atime`` updates cause performance problems in various 1290areas, Linux supports the ``relatime`` mount option, which generally 1291limits the updates of ``atime`` to once per day on files that aren't 1292being changed (and symlinks never change once created). Even without 1293``relatime``, many filesystems record ``atime`` with a one-second 1294granularity, so only one update per second is required. 1295 1296It is easy to test if an ``atime`` update is needed while in RCU-walk 1297mode and, if it isn't, the update can be skipped and RCU-walk mode 1298continues. Only when an ``atime`` update is actually required does the 1299path walk drop down to REF-walk. All of this is handled in the 1300``get_link()`` function. 1301 1302A few flags 1303----------- 1304 1305A suitable way to wrap up this tour of pathname walking is to list 1306the various flags that can be stored in the ``nameidata`` to guide the 1307lookup process. Many of these are only meaningful on the final 1308component, others reflect the current state of the pathname lookup, and some 1309apply restrictions to all path components encountered in the path lookup. 1310 1311And then there is ``LOOKUP_EMPTY``, which doesn't fit conceptually with 1312the others. If this is not set, an empty pathname causes an error 1313very early on. If it is set, empty pathnames are not considered to be 1314an error. 1315 1316Global state flags 1317~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1318 1319We have already met two global state flags: ``LOOKUP_RCU`` and 1320``LOOKUP_REVAL``. These select between one of three overall approaches 1321to lookup: RCU-walk, REF-walk, and REF-walk with forced revalidation. 1322 1323``LOOKUP_PARENT`` indicates that the final component hasn't been reached 1324yet. This is primarily used to tell the audit subsystem the full 1325context of a particular access being audited. 1326 1327``LOOKUP_ROOT`` indicates that the ``root`` field in the ``nameidata`` was 1328provided by the caller, so it shouldn't be released when it is no 1329longer needed. 1330 1331``LOOKUP_JUMPED`` means that the current dentry was chosen not because 1332it had the right name but for some other reason. This happens when 1333following "``..``", following a symlink to ``/``, crossing a mount point 1334or accessing a "``/proc/$PID/fd/$FD``" symlink (also known as a "magic 1335link"). In this case the filesystem has not been asked to revalidate the 1336name (with ``d_revalidate()``). In such cases the inode may still need 1337to be revalidated, so ``d_op->d_weak_revalidate()`` is called if 1338``LOOKUP_JUMPED`` is set when the look completes - which may be at the 1339final component or, when creating, unlinking, or renaming, at the penultimate component. 1340 1341Resolution-restriction flags 1342~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1343 1344In order to allow userspace to protect itself against certain race conditions 1345and attack scenarios involving changing path components, a series of flags are 1346available which apply restrictions to all path components encountered during 1347path lookup. These flags are exposed through ``openat2()``'s ``resolve`` field. 1348 1349``LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS`` blocks all symlink traversals (including magic-links). 1350This is distinctly different from ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW``, because the latter only 1351relates to restricting the following of trailing symlinks. 1352 1353``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` blocks all magic-link traversals. Filesystems must 1354ensure that they return errors from ``nd_jump_link()``, because that is how 1355``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` and other magic-link restrictions are implemented. 1356 1357``LOOKUP_NO_XDEV`` blocks all ``vfsmount`` traversals (this includes both 1358bind-mounts and ordinary mounts). Note that the ``vfsmount`` which contains the 1359lookup is determined by the first mountpoint the path lookup reaches -- 1360absolute paths start with the ``vfsmount`` of ``/``, and relative paths start 1361with the ``dfd``'s ``vfsmount``. Magic-links are only permitted if the 1362``vfsmount`` of the path is unchanged. 1363 1364``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` blocks any path components which resolve outside the 1365starting point of the resolution. This is done by blocking ``nd_jump_root()`` 1366as well as blocking ".." if it would jump outside the starting point. 1367``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect attacks against the 1368resolution of "..". Magic-links are also blocked. 1369 1370``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` resolves all path components as though the starting point 1371were the filesystem root. ``nd_jump_root()`` brings the resolution back to to 1372the starting point, and ".." at the starting point will act as a no-op. As with 1373``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, ``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect 1374attacks against ".." resolution. Magic-links are also blocked. 1375 1376Final-component flags 1377~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1378 1379Some of these flags are only set when the final component is being 1380considered. Others are only checked for when considering that final 1381component. 1382 1383``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` ensures that, if the final component is an automount 1384point, then the mount is triggered. Some operations would trigger it 1385anyway, but operations like ``stat()`` deliberately don't. ``statfs()`` 1386needs to trigger the mount but otherwise behaves a lot like ``stat()``, so 1387it sets ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT``, as does "``quotactl()``" and the handling of 1388"``mount --bind``". 1389 1390``LOOKUP_FOLLOW`` has a similar function to ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` but for 1391symlinks. Some system calls set or clear it implicitly, while 1392others have API flags such as ``AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW`` and 1393``UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW`` to control it. Its effect is similar to 1394``WALK_GET`` that we already met, but it is used in a different way. 1395 1396``LOOKUP_DIRECTORY`` insists that the final component is a directory. 1397Various callers set this and it is also set when the final component 1398is found to be followed by a slash. 1399 1400Finally ``LOOKUP_OPEN``, ``LOOKUP_CREATE``, ``LOOKUP_EXCL``, and 1401``LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET`` are not used directly by the VFS but are made 1402available to the filesystem and particularly the ``->d_revalidate()`` 1403method. A filesystem can choose not to bother revalidating too hard 1404if it knows that it will be asked to open or create the file soon. 1405These flags were previously useful for ``->lookup()`` too but with the 1406introduction of ``->atomic_open()`` they are less relevant there. 1407 1408End of the road 1409--------------- 1410 1411Despite its complexity, all this pathname lookup code appears to be 1412in good shape - various parts are certainly easier to understand now 1413than even a couple of releases ago. But that doesn't mean it is 1414"finished". As already mentioned, RCU-walk currently only follows 1415symlinks that are stored in the inode so, while it handles many ext4 1416symlinks, it doesn't help with NFS, XFS, or Btrfs. That support 1417is not likely to be long delayed. 1418