1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3=======================
4NFSv4 client identifier
5=======================
6
7This document explains how the NFSv4 protocol identifies client
8instances in order to maintain file open and lock state during
9system restarts. A special identifier and principal are maintained
10on each client. These can be set by administrators, scripts
11provided by site administrators, or tools provided by Linux
12distributors.
13
14There are risks if a client's NFSv4 identifier and its principal
15are not chosen carefully.
16
17
18Introduction
19------------
20
21The NFSv4 protocol uses "lease-based file locking". Leases help
22NFSv4 servers provide file lock guarantees and manage their
23resources.
24
25Simply put, an NFSv4 server creates a lease for each NFSv4 client.
26The server collects each client's file open and lock state under
27the lease for that client.
28
29The client is responsible for periodically renewing its leases.
30While a lease remains valid, the server holding that lease
31guarantees the file locks the client has created remain in place.
32
33If a client stops renewing its lease (for example, if it crashes),
34the NFSv4 protocol allows the server to remove the client's open
35and lock state after a certain period of time. When a client
36restarts, it indicates to servers that open and lock state
37associated with its previous leases is no longer valid and can be
38destroyed immediately.
39
40In addition, each NFSv4 server manages a persistent list of client
41leases. When the server restarts and clients attempt to recover
42their state, the server uses this list to distinguish amongst
43clients that held state before the server restarted and clients
44sending fresh OPEN and LOCK requests. This enables file locks to
45persist safely across server restarts.
46
47NFSv4 client identifiers
48------------------------
49
50Each NFSv4 client presents an identifier to NFSv4 servers so that
51they can associate the client with its lease. Each client's
52identifier consists of two elements:
53
54  - co_ownerid: An arbitrary but fixed string.
55
56  - boot verifier: A 64-bit incarnation verifier that enables a
57    server to distinguish successive boot epochs of the same client.
58
59The NFSv4.0 specification refers to these two items as an
60"nfs_client_id4". The NFSv4.1 specification refers to these two
61items as a "client_owner4".
62
63NFSv4 servers tie this identifier to the principal and security
64flavor that the client used when presenting it. Servers use this
65principal to authorize subsequent lease modification operations
66sent by the client. Effectively this principal is a third element of
67the identifier.
68
69As part of the identity presented to servers, a good
70"co_ownerid" string has several important properties:
71
72  - The "co_ownerid" string identifies the client during reboot
73    recovery, therefore the string is persistent across client
74    reboots.
75  - The "co_ownerid" string helps servers distinguish the client
76    from others, therefore the string is globally unique. Note
77    that there is no central authority that assigns "co_ownerid"
78    strings.
79  - Because it often appears on the network in the clear, the
80    "co_ownerid" string does not reveal private information about
81    the client itself.
82  - The content of the "co_ownerid" string is set and unchanging
83    before the client attempts NFSv4 mounts after a restart.
84  - The NFSv4 protocol places a 1024-byte limit on the size of the
85    "co_ownerid" string.
86
87Protecting NFSv4 lease state
88----------------------------
89
90NFSv4 servers utilize the "client_owner4" as described above to
91assign a unique lease to each client. Under this scheme, there are
92circumstances where clients can interfere with each other. This is
93referred to as "lease stealing".
94
95If distinct clients present the same "co_ownerid" string and use
96the same principal (for example, AUTH_SYS and UID 0), a server is
97unable to tell that the clients are not the same. Each distinct
98client presents a different boot verifier, so it appears to the
99server as if there is one client that is rebooting frequently.
100Neither client can maintain open or lock state in this scenario.
101
102If distinct clients present the same "co_ownerid" string and use
103distinct principals, the server is likely to allow the first client
104to operate normally but reject subsequent clients with the same
105"co_ownerid" string.
106
107If a client's "co_ownerid" string or principal are not stable,
108state recovery after a server or client reboot is not guaranteed.
109If a client unexpectedly restarts but presents a different
110"co_ownerid" string or principal to the server, the server orphans
111the client's previous open and lock state. This blocks access to
112locked files until the server removes the orphaned state.
113
114If the server restarts and a client presents a changed "co_ownerid"
115string or principal to the server, the server will not allow the
116client to reclaim its open and lock state, and may give those locks
117to other clients in the meantime. This is referred to as "lock
118stealing".
119
120Lease stealing and lock stealing increase the potential for denial
121of service and in rare cases even data corruption.
122
123Selecting an appropriate client identifier
124------------------------------------------
125
126By default, the Linux NFSv4 client implementation constructs its
127"co_ownerid" string starting with the words "Linux NFS" followed by
128the client's UTS node name (the same node name, incidentally, that
129is used as the "machine name" in an AUTH_SYS credential). In small
130deployments, this construction is usually adequate. Often, however,
131the node name by itself is not adequately unique, and can change
132unexpectedly. Problematic situations include:
133
134  - NFS-root (diskless) clients, where the local DCHP server (or
135    equivalent) does not provide a unique host name.
136
137  - "Containers" within a single Linux host.  If each container has
138    a separate network namespace, but does not use the UTS namespace
139    to provide a unique host name, then there can be multiple NFS
140    client instances with the same host name.
141
142  - Clients across multiple administrative domains that access a
143    common NFS server. If hostnames are not assigned centrally
144    then uniqueness cannot be guaranteed unless a domain name is
145    included in the hostname.
146
147Linux provides two mechanisms to add uniqueness to its "co_ownerid"
148string:
149
150    nfs.nfs4_unique_id
151      This module parameter can set an arbitrary uniquifier string
152      via the kernel command line, or when the "nfs" module is
153      loaded.
154
155    /sys/fs/nfs/client/net/identifier
156      This virtual file, available since Linux 5.3, is local to the
157      network namespace in which it is accessed and so can provide
158      distinction between network namespaces (containers) when the
159      hostname remains uniform.
160
161Note that this file is empty on name-space creation. If the
162container system has access to some sort of per-container identity
163then that uniquifier can be used. For example, a uniquifier might
164be formed at boot using the container's internal identifier:
165
166    sha256sum /etc/machine-id | awk '{print $1}' \\
167        > /sys/fs/nfs/client/net/identifier
168
169Security considerations
170-----------------------
171
172The use of cryptographic security for lease management operations
173is strongly encouraged.
174
175If NFS with Kerberos is not configured, a Linux NFSv4 client uses
176AUTH_SYS and UID 0 as the principal part of its client identity.
177This configuration is not only insecure, it increases the risk of
178lease and lock stealing. However, it might be the only choice for
179client configurations that have no local persistent storage.
180"co_ownerid" string uniqueness and persistence is critical in this
181case.
182
183When a Kerberos keytab is present on a Linux NFS client, the client
184attempts to use one of the principals in that keytab when
185identifying itself to servers. The "sec=" mount option does not
186control this behavior. Alternately, a single-user client with a
187Kerberos principal can use that principal in place of the client's
188host principal.
189
190Using Kerberos for this purpose enables the client and server to
191use the same lease for operations covered by all "sec=" settings.
192Additionally, the Linux NFS client uses the RPCSEC_GSS security
193flavor with Kerberos and the integrity QOS to prevent in-transit
194modification of lease modification requests.
195
196Additional notes
197----------------
198The Linux NFSv4 client establishes a single lease on each NFSv4
199server it accesses. NFSv4 mounts from a Linux NFSv4 client of a
200particular server then share that lease.
201
202Once a client establishes open and lock state, the NFSv4 protocol
203enables lease state to transition to other servers, following data
204that has been migrated. This hides data migration completely from
205running applications. The Linux NFSv4 client facilitates state
206migration by presenting the same "client_owner4" to all servers it
207encounters.
208
209========
210See Also
211========
212
213  - nfs(5)
214  - kerberos(7)
215  - RFC 7530 for the NFSv4.0 specification
216  - RFC 8881 for the NFSv4.1 specification.
217