1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3.. _fsverity:
4
5=======================================================
6fs-verity: read-only file-based authenticity protection
7=======================================================
8
9Introduction
10============
11
12fs-verity (``fs/verity/``) is a support layer that filesystems can
13hook into to support transparent integrity and authenticity protection
14of read-only files.  Currently, it is supported by the ext4 and f2fs
15filesystems.  Like fscrypt, not too much filesystem-specific code is
16needed to support fs-verity.
17
18fs-verity is similar to `dm-verity
19<https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/device-mapper/verity.txt>`_
20but works on files rather than block devices.  On regular files on
21filesystems supporting fs-verity, userspace can execute an ioctl that
22causes the filesystem to build a Merkle tree for the file and persist
23it to a filesystem-specific location associated with the file.
24
25After this, the file is made readonly, and all reads from the file are
26automatically verified against the file's Merkle tree.  Reads of any
27corrupted data, including mmap reads, will fail.
28
29Userspace can use another ioctl to retrieve the root hash (actually
30the "file measurement", which is a hash that includes the root hash)
31that fs-verity is enforcing for the file.  This ioctl executes in
32constant time, regardless of the file size.
33
34fs-verity is essentially a way to hash a file in constant time,
35subject to the caveat that reads which would violate the hash will
36fail at runtime.
37
38Use cases
39=========
40
41By itself, the base fs-verity feature only provides integrity
42protection, i.e. detection of accidental (non-malicious) corruption.
43
44However, because fs-verity makes retrieving the file hash extremely
45efficient, it's primarily meant to be used as a tool to support
46authentication (detection of malicious modifications) or auditing
47(logging file hashes before use).
48
49Trusted userspace code (e.g. operating system code running on a
50read-only partition that is itself authenticated by dm-verity) can
51authenticate the contents of an fs-verity file by using the
52`FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY`_ ioctl to retrieve its hash, then verifying a
53digital signature of it.
54
55A standard file hash could be used instead of fs-verity.  However,
56this is inefficient if the file is large and only a small portion may
57be accessed.  This is often the case for Android application package
58(APK) files, for example.  These typically contain many translations,
59classes, and other resources that are infrequently or even never
60accessed on a particular device.  It would be slow and wasteful to
61read and hash the entire file before starting the application.
62
63Unlike an ahead-of-time hash, fs-verity also re-verifies data each
64time it's paged in.  This ensures that malicious disk firmware can't
65undetectably change the contents of the file at runtime.
66
67fs-verity does not replace or obsolete dm-verity.  dm-verity should
68still be used on read-only filesystems.  fs-verity is for files that
69must live on a read-write filesystem because they are independently
70updated and potentially user-installed, so dm-verity cannot be used.
71
72The base fs-verity feature is a hashing mechanism only; actually
73authenticating the files is up to userspace.  However, to meet some
74users' needs, fs-verity optionally supports a simple signature
75verification mechanism where users can configure the kernel to require
76that all fs-verity files be signed by a key loaded into a keyring; see
77`Built-in signature verification`_.  Support for fs-verity file hashes
78in IMA (Integrity Measurement Architecture) policies is also planned.
79
80User API
81========
82
83FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY
84--------------------
85
86The FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY ioctl enables fs-verity on a file.  It takes
87in a pointer to a :c:type:`struct fsverity_enable_arg`, defined as
88follows::
89
90    struct fsverity_enable_arg {
91            __u32 version;
92            __u32 hash_algorithm;
93            __u32 block_size;
94            __u32 salt_size;
95            __u64 salt_ptr;
96            __u32 sig_size;
97            __u32 __reserved1;
98            __u64 sig_ptr;
99            __u64 __reserved2[11];
100    };
101
102This structure contains the parameters of the Merkle tree to build for
103the file, and optionally contains a signature.  It must be initialized
104as follows:
105
106- ``version`` must be 1.
107- ``hash_algorithm`` must be the identifier for the hash algorithm to
108  use for the Merkle tree, such as FS_VERITY_HASH_ALG_SHA256.  See
109  ``include/uapi/linux/fsverity.h`` for the list of possible values.
110- ``block_size`` must be the Merkle tree block size.  Currently, this
111  must be equal to the system page size, which is usually 4096 bytes.
112  Other sizes may be supported in the future.  This value is not
113  necessarily the same as the filesystem block size.
114- ``salt_size`` is the size of the salt in bytes, or 0 if no salt is
115  provided.  The salt is a value that is prepended to every hashed
116  block; it can be used to personalize the hashing for a particular
117  file or device.  Currently the maximum salt size is 32 bytes.
118- ``salt_ptr`` is the pointer to the salt, or NULL if no salt is
119  provided.
120- ``sig_size`` is the size of the signature in bytes, or 0 if no
121  signature is provided.  Currently the signature is (somewhat
122  arbitrarily) limited to 16128 bytes.  See `Built-in signature
123  verification`_ for more information.
124- ``sig_ptr``  is the pointer to the signature, or NULL if no
125  signature is provided.
126- All reserved fields must be zeroed.
127
128FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY causes the filesystem to build a Merkle tree for
129the file and persist it to a filesystem-specific location associated
130with the file, then mark the file as a verity file.  This ioctl may
131take a long time to execute on large files, and it is interruptible by
132fatal signals.
133
134FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY checks for write access to the inode.  However,
135it must be executed on an O_RDONLY file descriptor and no processes
136can have the file open for writing.  Attempts to open the file for
137writing while this ioctl is executing will fail with ETXTBSY.  (This
138is necessary to guarantee that no writable file descriptors will exist
139after verity is enabled, and to guarantee that the file's contents are
140stable while the Merkle tree is being built over it.)
141
142On success, FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY returns 0, and the file becomes a
143verity file.  On failure (including the case of interruption by a
144fatal signal), no changes are made to the file.
145
146FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY can fail with the following errors:
147
148- ``EACCES``: the process does not have write access to the file
149- ``EBADMSG``: the signature is malformed
150- ``EBUSY``: this ioctl is already running on the file
151- ``EEXIST``: the file already has verity enabled
152- ``EFAULT``: the caller provided inaccessible memory
153- ``EINTR``: the operation was interrupted by a fatal signal
154- ``EINVAL``: unsupported version, hash algorithm, or block size; or
155  reserved bits are set; or the file descriptor refers to neither a
156  regular file nor a directory.
157- ``EISDIR``: the file descriptor refers to a directory
158- ``EKEYREJECTED``: the signature doesn't match the file
159- ``EMSGSIZE``: the salt or signature is too long
160- ``ENOKEY``: the fs-verity keyring doesn't contain the certificate
161  needed to verify the signature
162- ``ENOPKG``: fs-verity recognizes the hash algorithm, but it's not
163  available in the kernel's crypto API as currently configured (e.g.
164  for SHA-512, missing CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512).
165- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement fs-verity
166- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with fs-verity
167  support; or the filesystem superblock has not had the 'verity'
168  feature enabled on it; or the filesystem does not support fs-verity
169  on this file.  (See `Filesystem support`_.)
170- ``EPERM``: the file is append-only; or, a signature is required and
171  one was not provided.
172- ``EROFS``: the filesystem is read-only
173- ``ETXTBSY``: someone has the file open for writing.  This can be the
174  caller's file descriptor, another open file descriptor, or the file
175  reference held by a writable memory map.
176
177FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY
178---------------------
179
180The FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY ioctl retrieves the measurement of a verity
181file.  The file measurement is a digest that cryptographically
182identifies the file contents that are being enforced on reads.
183
184This ioctl takes in a pointer to a variable-length structure::
185
186    struct fsverity_digest {
187            __u16 digest_algorithm;
188            __u16 digest_size; /* input/output */
189            __u8 digest[];
190    };
191
192``digest_size`` is an input/output field.  On input, it must be
193initialized to the number of bytes allocated for the variable-length
194``digest`` field.
195
196On success, 0 is returned and the kernel fills in the structure as
197follows:
198
199- ``digest_algorithm`` will be the hash algorithm used for the file
200  measurement.  It will match ``fsverity_enable_arg::hash_algorithm``.
201- ``digest_size`` will be the size of the digest in bytes, e.g. 32
202  for SHA-256.  (This can be redundant with ``digest_algorithm``.)
203- ``digest`` will be the actual bytes of the digest.
204
205FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY is guaranteed to execute in constant time,
206regardless of the size of the file.
207
208FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY can fail with the following errors:
209
210- ``EFAULT``: the caller provided inaccessible memory
211- ``ENODATA``: the file is not a verity file
212- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement fs-verity
213- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with fs-verity
214  support, or the filesystem superblock has not had the 'verity'
215  feature enabled on it.  (See `Filesystem support`_.)
216- ``EOVERFLOW``: the digest is longer than the specified
217  ``digest_size`` bytes.  Try providing a larger buffer.
218
219FS_IOC_GETFLAGS
220---------------
221
222The existing ioctl FS_IOC_GETFLAGS (which isn't specific to fs-verity)
223can also be used to check whether a file has fs-verity enabled or not.
224To do so, check for FS_VERITY_FL (0x00100000) in the returned flags.
225
226The verity flag is not settable via FS_IOC_SETFLAGS.  You must use
227FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY instead, since parameters must be provided.
228
229statx
230-----
231
232Since Linux v5.5, the statx() system call sets STATX_ATTR_VERITY if
233the file has fs-verity enabled.  This can perform better than
234FS_IOC_GETFLAGS and FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY because it doesn't require
235opening the file, and opening verity files can be expensive.
236
237Accessing verity files
238======================
239
240Applications can transparently access a verity file just like a
241non-verity one, with the following exceptions:
242
243- Verity files are readonly.  They cannot be opened for writing or
244  truncate()d, even if the file mode bits allow it.  Attempts to do
245  one of these things will fail with EPERM.  However, changes to
246  metadata such as owner, mode, timestamps, and xattrs are still
247  allowed, since these are not measured by fs-verity.  Verity files
248  can also still be renamed, deleted, and linked to.
249
250- Direct I/O is not supported on verity files.  Attempts to use direct
251  I/O on such files will fall back to buffered I/O.
252
253- DAX (Direct Access) is not supported on verity files, because this
254  would circumvent the data verification.
255
256- Reads of data that doesn't match the verity Merkle tree will fail
257  with EIO (for read()) or SIGBUS (for mmap() reads).
258
259- If the sysctl "fs.verity.require_signatures" is set to 1 and the
260  file's verity measurement is not signed by a key in the fs-verity
261  keyring, then opening the file will fail.  See `Built-in signature
262  verification`_.
263
264Direct access to the Merkle tree is not supported.  Therefore, if a
265verity file is copied, or is backed up and restored, then it will lose
266its "verity"-ness.  fs-verity is primarily meant for files like
267executables that are managed by a package manager.
268
269File measurement computation
270============================
271
272This section describes how fs-verity hashes the file contents using a
273Merkle tree to produce the "file measurement" which cryptographically
274identifies the file contents.  This algorithm is the same for all
275filesystems that support fs-verity.
276
277Userspace only needs to be aware of this algorithm if it needs to
278compute the file measurement itself, e.g. in order to sign the file.
279
280.. _fsverity_merkle_tree:
281
282Merkle tree
283-----------
284
285The file contents is divided into blocks, where the block size is
286configurable but is usually 4096 bytes.  The end of the last block is
287zero-padded if needed.  Each block is then hashed, producing the first
288level of hashes.  Then, the hashes in this first level are grouped
289into 'blocksize'-byte blocks (zero-padding the ends as needed) and
290these blocks are hashed, producing the second level of hashes.  This
291proceeds up the tree until only a single block remains.  The hash of
292this block is the "Merkle tree root hash".
293
294If the file fits in one block and is nonempty, then the "Merkle tree
295root hash" is simply the hash of the single data block.  If the file
296is empty, then the "Merkle tree root hash" is all zeroes.
297
298The "blocks" here are not necessarily the same as "filesystem blocks".
299
300If a salt was specified, then it's zero-padded to the closest multiple
301of the input size of the hash algorithm's compression function, e.g.
30264 bytes for SHA-256 or 128 bytes for SHA-512.  The padded salt is
303prepended to every data or Merkle tree block that is hashed.
304
305The purpose of the block padding is to cause every hash to be taken
306over the same amount of data, which simplifies the implementation and
307keeps open more possibilities for hardware acceleration.  The purpose
308of the salt padding is to make the salting "free" when the salted hash
309state is precomputed, then imported for each hash.
310
311Example: in the recommended configuration of SHA-256 and 4K blocks,
312128 hash values fit in each block.  Thus, each level of the Merkle
313tree is approximately 128 times smaller than the previous, and for
314large files the Merkle tree's size converges to approximately 1/127 of
315the original file size.  However, for small files, the padding is
316significant, making the space overhead proportionally more.
317
318.. _fsverity_descriptor:
319
320fs-verity descriptor
321--------------------
322
323By itself, the Merkle tree root hash is ambiguous.  For example, it
324can't a distinguish a large file from a small second file whose data
325is exactly the top-level hash block of the first file.  Ambiguities
326also arise from the convention of padding to the next block boundary.
327
328To solve this problem, the verity file measurement is actually
329computed as a hash of the following structure, which contains the
330Merkle tree root hash as well as other fields such as the file size::
331
332    struct fsverity_descriptor {
333            __u8 version;           /* must be 1 */
334            __u8 hash_algorithm;    /* Merkle tree hash algorithm */
335            __u8 log_blocksize;     /* log2 of size of data and tree blocks */
336            __u8 salt_size;         /* size of salt in bytes; 0 if none */
337            __le32 sig_size;        /* must be 0 */
338            __le64 data_size;       /* size of file the Merkle tree is built over */
339            __u8 root_hash[64];     /* Merkle tree root hash */
340            __u8 salt[32];          /* salt prepended to each hashed block */
341            __u8 __reserved[144];   /* must be 0's */
342    };
343
344Note that the ``sig_size`` field must be set to 0 for the purpose of
345computing the file measurement, even if a signature was provided (or
346will be provided) to `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_.
347
348Built-in signature verification
349===============================
350
351With CONFIG_FS_VERITY_BUILTIN_SIGNATURES=y, fs-verity supports putting
352a portion of an authentication policy (see `Use cases`_) in the
353kernel.  Specifically, it adds support for:
354
3551. At fs-verity module initialization time, a keyring ".fs-verity" is
356   created.  The root user can add trusted X.509 certificates to this
357   keyring using the add_key() system call, then (when done)
358   optionally use keyctl_restrict_keyring() to prevent additional
359   certificates from being added.
360
3612. `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_ accepts a pointer to a PKCS#7 formatted
362   detached signature in DER format of the file measurement.  On
363   success, this signature is persisted alongside the Merkle tree.
364   Then, any time the file is opened, the kernel will verify the
365   file's actual measurement against this signature, using the
366   certificates in the ".fs-verity" keyring.
367
3683. A new sysctl "fs.verity.require_signatures" is made available.
369   When set to 1, the kernel requires that all verity files have a
370   correctly signed file measurement as described in (2).
371
372File measurements must be signed in the following format, which is
373similar to the structure used by `FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY`_::
374
375    struct fsverity_signed_digest {
376            char magic[8];                  /* must be "FSVerity" */
377            __le16 digest_algorithm;
378            __le16 digest_size;
379            __u8 digest[];
380    };
381
382fs-verity's built-in signature verification support is meant as a
383relatively simple mechanism that can be used to provide some level of
384authenticity protection for verity files, as an alternative to doing
385the signature verification in userspace or using IMA-appraisal.
386However, with this mechanism, userspace programs still need to check
387that the verity bit is set, and there is no protection against verity
388files being swapped around.
389
390Filesystem support
391==================
392
393fs-verity is currently supported by the ext4 and f2fs filesystems.
394The CONFIG_FS_VERITY kconfig option must be enabled to use fs-verity
395on either filesystem.
396
397``include/linux/fsverity.h`` declares the interface between the
398``fs/verity/`` support layer and filesystems.  Briefly, filesystems
399must provide an ``fsverity_operations`` structure that provides
400methods to read and write the verity metadata to a filesystem-specific
401location, including the Merkle tree blocks and
402``fsverity_descriptor``.  Filesystems must also call functions in
403``fs/verity/`` at certain times, such as when a file is opened or when
404pages have been read into the pagecache.  (See `Verifying data`_.)
405
406ext4
407----
408
409ext4 supports fs-verity since Linux v5.4 and e2fsprogs v1.45.2.
410
411To create verity files on an ext4 filesystem, the filesystem must have
412been formatted with ``-O verity`` or had ``tune2fs -O verity`` run on
413it.  "verity" is an RO_COMPAT filesystem feature, so once set, old
414kernels will only be able to mount the filesystem readonly, and old
415versions of e2fsck will be unable to check the filesystem.  Moreover,
416currently ext4 only supports mounting a filesystem with the "verity"
417feature when its block size is equal to PAGE_SIZE (often 4096 bytes).
418
419ext4 sets the EXT4_VERITY_FL on-disk inode flag on verity files.  It
420can only be set by `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_, and it cannot be cleared.
421
422ext4 also supports encryption, which can be used simultaneously with
423fs-verity.  In this case, the plaintext data is verified rather than
424the ciphertext.  This is necessary in order to make the file
425measurement meaningful, since every file is encrypted differently.
426
427ext4 stores the verity metadata (Merkle tree and fsverity_descriptor)
428past the end of the file, starting at the first 64K boundary beyond
429i_size.  This approach works because (a) verity files are readonly,
430and (b) pages fully beyond i_size aren't visible to userspace but can
431be read/written internally by ext4 with only some relatively small
432changes to ext4.  This approach avoids having to depend on the
433EA_INODE feature and on rearchitecturing ext4's xattr support to
434support paging multi-gigabyte xattrs into memory, and to support
435encrypting xattrs.  Note that the verity metadata *must* be encrypted
436when the file is, since it contains hashes of the plaintext data.
437
438Currently, ext4 verity only supports the case where the Merkle tree
439block size, filesystem block size, and page size are all the same.  It
440also only supports extent-based files.
441
442f2fs
443----
444
445f2fs supports fs-verity since Linux v5.4 and f2fs-tools v1.11.0.
446
447To create verity files on an f2fs filesystem, the filesystem must have
448been formatted with ``-O verity``.
449
450f2fs sets the FADVISE_VERITY_BIT on-disk inode flag on verity files.
451It can only be set by `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_, and it cannot be
452cleared.
453
454Like ext4, f2fs stores the verity metadata (Merkle tree and
455fsverity_descriptor) past the end of the file, starting at the first
45664K boundary beyond i_size.  See explanation for ext4 above.
457Moreover, f2fs supports at most 4096 bytes of xattr entries per inode
458which wouldn't be enough for even a single Merkle tree block.
459
460Currently, f2fs verity only supports a Merkle tree block size of 4096.
461Also, f2fs doesn't support enabling verity on files that currently
462have atomic or volatile writes pending.
463
464Implementation details
465======================
466
467Verifying data
468--------------
469
470fs-verity ensures that all reads of a verity file's data are verified,
471regardless of which syscall is used to do the read (e.g. mmap(),
472read(), pread()) and regardless of whether it's the first read or a
473later read (unless the later read can return cached data that was
474already verified).  Below, we describe how filesystems implement this.
475
476Pagecache
477~~~~~~~~~
478
479For filesystems using Linux's pagecache, the ``->readpage()`` and
480``->readpages()`` methods must be modified to verify pages before they
481are marked Uptodate.  Merely hooking ``->read_iter()`` would be
482insufficient, since ``->read_iter()`` is not used for memory maps.
483
484Therefore, fs/verity/ provides a function fsverity_verify_page() which
485verifies a page that has been read into the pagecache of a verity
486inode, but is still locked and not Uptodate, so it's not yet readable
487by userspace.  As needed to do the verification,
488fsverity_verify_page() will call back into the filesystem to read
489Merkle tree pages via fsverity_operations::read_merkle_tree_page().
490
491fsverity_verify_page() returns false if verification failed; in this
492case, the filesystem must not set the page Uptodate.  Following this,
493as per the usual Linux pagecache behavior, attempts by userspace to
494read() from the part of the file containing the page will fail with
495EIO, and accesses to the page within a memory map will raise SIGBUS.
496
497fsverity_verify_page() currently only supports the case where the
498Merkle tree block size is equal to PAGE_SIZE (often 4096 bytes).
499
500In principle, fsverity_verify_page() verifies the entire path in the
501Merkle tree from the data page to the root hash.  However, for
502efficiency the filesystem may cache the hash pages.  Therefore,
503fsverity_verify_page() only ascends the tree reading hash pages until
504an already-verified hash page is seen, as indicated by the PageChecked
505bit being set.  It then verifies the path to that page.
506
507This optimization, which is also used by dm-verity, results in
508excellent sequential read performance.  This is because usually (e.g.
509127 in 128 times for 4K blocks and SHA-256) the hash page from the
510bottom level of the tree will already be cached and checked from
511reading a previous data page.  However, random reads perform worse.
512
513Block device based filesystems
514~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
515
516Block device based filesystems (e.g. ext4 and f2fs) in Linux also use
517the pagecache, so the above subsection applies too.  However, they
518also usually read many pages from a file at once, grouped into a
519structure called a "bio".  To make it easier for these types of
520filesystems to support fs-verity, fs/verity/ also provides a function
521fsverity_verify_bio() which verifies all pages in a bio.
522
523ext4 and f2fs also support encryption.  If a verity file is also
524encrypted, the pages must be decrypted before being verified.  To
525support this, these filesystems allocate a "post-read context" for
526each bio and store it in ``->bi_private``::
527
528    struct bio_post_read_ctx {
529           struct bio *bio;
530           struct work_struct work;
531           unsigned int cur_step;
532           unsigned int enabled_steps;
533    };
534
535``enabled_steps`` is a bitmask that specifies whether decryption,
536verity, or both is enabled.  After the bio completes, for each needed
537postprocessing step the filesystem enqueues the bio_post_read_ctx on a
538workqueue, and then the workqueue work does the decryption or
539verification.  Finally, pages where no decryption or verity error
540occurred are marked Uptodate, and the pages are unlocked.
541
542Files on ext4 and f2fs may contain holes.  Normally, ``->readpages()``
543simply zeroes holes and sets the corresponding pages Uptodate; no bios
544are issued.  To prevent this case from bypassing fs-verity, these
545filesystems use fsverity_verify_page() to verify hole pages.
546
547ext4 and f2fs disable direct I/O on verity files, since otherwise
548direct I/O would bypass fs-verity.  (They also do the same for
549encrypted files.)
550
551Userspace utility
552=================
553
554This document focuses on the kernel, but a userspace utility for
555fs-verity can be found at:
556
557	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/fsverity-utils.git
558
559See the README.md file in the fsverity-utils source tree for details,
560including examples of setting up fs-verity protected files.
561
562Tests
563=====
564
565To test fs-verity, use xfstests.  For example, using `kvm-xfstests
566<https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/kvm-quickstart.md>`_::
567
568    kvm-xfstests -c ext4,f2fs -g verity
569
570FAQ
571===
572
573This section answers frequently asked questions about fs-verity that
574weren't already directly answered in other parts of this document.
575
576:Q: Why isn't fs-verity part of IMA?
577:A: fs-verity and IMA (Integrity Measurement Architecture) have
578    different focuses.  fs-verity is a filesystem-level mechanism for
579    hashing individual files using a Merkle tree.  In contrast, IMA
580    specifies a system-wide policy that specifies which files are
581    hashed and what to do with those hashes, such as log them,
582    authenticate them, or add them to a measurement list.
583
584    IMA is planned to support the fs-verity hashing mechanism as an
585    alternative to doing full file hashes, for people who want the
586    performance and security benefits of the Merkle tree based hash.
587    But it doesn't make sense to force all uses of fs-verity to be
588    through IMA.  As a standalone filesystem feature, fs-verity
589    already meets many users' needs, and it's testable like other
590    filesystem features e.g. with xfstests.
591
592:Q: Isn't fs-verity useless because the attacker can just modify the
593    hashes in the Merkle tree, which is stored on-disk?
594:A: To verify the authenticity of an fs-verity file you must verify
595    the authenticity of the "file measurement", which is basically the
596    root hash of the Merkle tree.  See `Use cases`_.
597
598:Q: Isn't fs-verity useless because the attacker can just replace a
599    verity file with a non-verity one?
600:A: See `Use cases`_.  In the initial use case, it's really trusted
601    userspace code that authenticates the files; fs-verity is just a
602    tool to do this job efficiently and securely.  The trusted
603    userspace code will consider non-verity files to be inauthentic.
604
605:Q: Why does the Merkle tree need to be stored on-disk?  Couldn't you
606    store just the root hash?
607:A: If the Merkle tree wasn't stored on-disk, then you'd have to
608    compute the entire tree when the file is first accessed, even if
609    just one byte is being read.  This is a fundamental consequence of
610    how Merkle tree hashing works.  To verify a leaf node, you need to
611    verify the whole path to the root hash, including the root node
612    (the thing which the root hash is a hash of).  But if the root
613    node isn't stored on-disk, you have to compute it by hashing its
614    children, and so on until you've actually hashed the entire file.
615
616    That defeats most of the point of doing a Merkle tree-based hash,
617    since if you have to hash the whole file ahead of time anyway,
618    then you could simply do sha256(file) instead.  That would be much
619    simpler, and a bit faster too.
620
621    It's true that an in-memory Merkle tree could still provide the
622    advantage of verification on every read rather than just on the
623    first read.  However, it would be inefficient because every time a
624    hash page gets evicted (you can't pin the entire Merkle tree into
625    memory, since it may be very large), in order to restore it you
626    again need to hash everything below it in the tree.  This again
627    defeats most of the point of doing a Merkle tree-based hash, since
628    a single block read could trigger re-hashing gigabytes of data.
629
630:Q: But couldn't you store just the leaf nodes and compute the rest?
631:A: See previous answer; this really just moves up one level, since
632    one could alternatively interpret the data blocks as being the
633    leaf nodes of the Merkle tree.  It's true that the tree can be
634    computed much faster if the leaf level is stored rather than just
635    the data, but that's only because each level is less than 1% the
636    size of the level below (assuming the recommended settings of
637    SHA-256 and 4K blocks).  For the exact same reason, by storing
638    "just the leaf nodes" you'd already be storing over 99% of the
639    tree, so you might as well simply store the whole tree.
640
641:Q: Can the Merkle tree be built ahead of time, e.g. distributed as
642    part of a package that is installed to many computers?
643:A: This isn't currently supported.  It was part of the original
644    design, but was removed to simplify the kernel UAPI and because it
645    wasn't a critical use case.  Files are usually installed once and
646    used many times, and cryptographic hashing is somewhat fast on
647    most modern processors.
648
649:Q: Why doesn't fs-verity support writes?
650:A: Write support would be very difficult and would require a
651    completely different design, so it's well outside the scope of
652    fs-verity.  Write support would require:
653
654    - A way to maintain consistency between the data and hashes,
655      including all levels of hashes, since corruption after a crash
656      (especially of potentially the entire file!) is unacceptable.
657      The main options for solving this are data journalling,
658      copy-on-write, and log-structured volume.  But it's very hard to
659      retrofit existing filesystems with new consistency mechanisms.
660      Data journalling is available on ext4, but is very slow.
661
662    - Rebuilding the Merkle tree after every write, which would be
663      extremely inefficient.  Alternatively, a different authenticated
664      dictionary structure such as an "authenticated skiplist" could
665      be used.  However, this would be far more complex.
666
667    Compare it to dm-verity vs. dm-integrity.  dm-verity is very
668    simple: the kernel just verifies read-only data against a
669    read-only Merkle tree.  In contrast, dm-integrity supports writes
670    but is slow, is much more complex, and doesn't actually support
671    full-device authentication since it authenticates each sector
672    independently, i.e. there is no "root hash".  It doesn't really
673    make sense for the same device-mapper target to support these two
674    very different cases; the same applies to fs-verity.
675
676:Q: Since verity files are immutable, why isn't the immutable bit set?
677:A: The existing "immutable" bit (FS_IMMUTABLE_FL) already has a
678    specific set of semantics which not only make the file contents
679    read-only, but also prevent the file from being deleted, renamed,
680    linked to, or having its owner or mode changed.  These extra
681    properties are unwanted for fs-verity, so reusing the immutable
682    bit isn't appropriate.
683
684:Q: Why does the API use ioctls instead of setxattr() and getxattr()?
685:A: Abusing the xattr interface for basically arbitrary syscalls is
686    heavily frowned upon by most of the Linux filesystem developers.
687    An xattr should really just be an xattr on-disk, not an API to
688    e.g. magically trigger construction of a Merkle tree.
689
690:Q: Does fs-verity support remote filesystems?
691:A: Only ext4 and f2fs support is implemented currently, but in
692    principle any filesystem that can store per-file verity metadata
693    can support fs-verity, regardless of whether it's local or remote.
694    Some filesystems may have fewer options of where to store the
695    verity metadata; one possibility is to store it past the end of
696    the file and "hide" it from userspace by manipulating i_size.  The
697    data verification functions provided by ``fs/verity/`` also assume
698    that the filesystem uses the Linux pagecache, but both local and
699    remote filesystems normally do so.
700
701:Q: Why is anything filesystem-specific at all?  Shouldn't fs-verity
702    be implemented entirely at the VFS level?
703:A: There are many reasons why this is not possible or would be very
704    difficult, including the following:
705
706    - To prevent bypassing verification, pages must not be marked
707      Uptodate until they've been verified.  Currently, each
708      filesystem is responsible for marking pages Uptodate via
709      ``->readpages()``.  Therefore, currently it's not possible for
710      the VFS to do the verification on its own.  Changing this would
711      require significant changes to the VFS and all filesystems.
712
713    - It would require defining a filesystem-independent way to store
714      the verity metadata.  Extended attributes don't work for this
715      because (a) the Merkle tree may be gigabytes, but many
716      filesystems assume that all xattrs fit into a single 4K
717      filesystem block, and (b) ext4 and f2fs encryption doesn't
718      encrypt xattrs, yet the Merkle tree *must* be encrypted when the
719      file contents are, because it stores hashes of the plaintext
720      file contents.
721
722      So the verity metadata would have to be stored in an actual
723      file.  Using a separate file would be very ugly, since the
724      metadata is fundamentally part of the file to be protected, and
725      it could cause problems where users could delete the real file
726      but not the metadata file or vice versa.  On the other hand,
727      having it be in the same file would break applications unless
728      filesystems' notion of i_size were divorced from the VFS's,
729      which would be complex and require changes to all filesystems.
730
731    - It's desirable that FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY uses the filesystem's
732      transaction mechanism so that either the file ends up with
733      verity enabled, or no changes were made.  Allowing intermediate
734      states to occur after a crash may cause problems.
735