1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3.. _fsverity:
4
5=======================================================
6fs-verity: read-only file-based authenticity protection
7=======================================================
8
9Introduction
10============
11
12fs-verity (``fs/verity/``) is a support layer that filesystems can
13hook into to support transparent integrity and authenticity protection
14of read-only files.  Currently, it is supported by the ext4 and f2fs
15filesystems.  Like fscrypt, not too much filesystem-specific code is
16needed to support fs-verity.
17
18fs-verity is similar to `dm-verity
19<https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/device-mapper/verity.txt>`_
20but works on files rather than block devices.  On regular files on
21filesystems supporting fs-verity, userspace can execute an ioctl that
22causes the filesystem to build a Merkle tree for the file and persist
23it to a filesystem-specific location associated with the file.
24
25After this, the file is made readonly, and all reads from the file are
26automatically verified against the file's Merkle tree.  Reads of any
27corrupted data, including mmap reads, will fail.
28
29Userspace can use another ioctl to retrieve the root hash (actually
30the "fs-verity file digest", which is a hash that includes the Merkle
31tree root hash) that fs-verity is enforcing for the file.  This ioctl
32executes in constant time, regardless of the file size.
33
34fs-verity is essentially a way to hash a file in constant time,
35subject to the caveat that reads which would violate the hash will
36fail at runtime.
37
38Use cases
39=========
40
41By itself, the base fs-verity feature only provides integrity
42protection, i.e. detection of accidental (non-malicious) corruption.
43
44However, because fs-verity makes retrieving the file hash extremely
45efficient, it's primarily meant to be used as a tool to support
46authentication (detection of malicious modifications) or auditing
47(logging file hashes before use).
48
49Trusted userspace code (e.g. operating system code running on a
50read-only partition that is itself authenticated by dm-verity) can
51authenticate the contents of an fs-verity file by using the
52`FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY`_ ioctl to retrieve its hash, then verifying a
53digital signature of it.
54
55A standard file hash could be used instead of fs-verity.  However,
56this is inefficient if the file is large and only a small portion may
57be accessed.  This is often the case for Android application package
58(APK) files, for example.  These typically contain many translations,
59classes, and other resources that are infrequently or even never
60accessed on a particular device.  It would be slow and wasteful to
61read and hash the entire file before starting the application.
62
63Unlike an ahead-of-time hash, fs-verity also re-verifies data each
64time it's paged in.  This ensures that malicious disk firmware can't
65undetectably change the contents of the file at runtime.
66
67fs-verity does not replace or obsolete dm-verity.  dm-verity should
68still be used on read-only filesystems.  fs-verity is for files that
69must live on a read-write filesystem because they are independently
70updated and potentially user-installed, so dm-verity cannot be used.
71
72The base fs-verity feature is a hashing mechanism only; actually
73authenticating the files is up to userspace.  However, to meet some
74users' needs, fs-verity optionally supports a simple signature
75verification mechanism where users can configure the kernel to require
76that all fs-verity files be signed by a key loaded into a keyring; see
77`Built-in signature verification`_.  Support for fs-verity file hashes
78in IMA (Integrity Measurement Architecture) policies is also planned.
79
80User API
81========
82
83FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY
84--------------------
85
86The FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY ioctl enables fs-verity on a file.  It takes
87in a pointer to a struct fsverity_enable_arg, defined as
88follows::
89
90    struct fsverity_enable_arg {
91            __u32 version;
92            __u32 hash_algorithm;
93            __u32 block_size;
94            __u32 salt_size;
95            __u64 salt_ptr;
96            __u32 sig_size;
97            __u32 __reserved1;
98            __u64 sig_ptr;
99            __u64 __reserved2[11];
100    };
101
102This structure contains the parameters of the Merkle tree to build for
103the file, and optionally contains a signature.  It must be initialized
104as follows:
105
106- ``version`` must be 1.
107- ``hash_algorithm`` must be the identifier for the hash algorithm to
108  use for the Merkle tree, such as FS_VERITY_HASH_ALG_SHA256.  See
109  ``include/uapi/linux/fsverity.h`` for the list of possible values.
110- ``block_size`` must be the Merkle tree block size.  Currently, this
111  must be equal to the system page size, which is usually 4096 bytes.
112  Other sizes may be supported in the future.  This value is not
113  necessarily the same as the filesystem block size.
114- ``salt_size`` is the size of the salt in bytes, or 0 if no salt is
115  provided.  The salt is a value that is prepended to every hashed
116  block; it can be used to personalize the hashing for a particular
117  file or device.  Currently the maximum salt size is 32 bytes.
118- ``salt_ptr`` is the pointer to the salt, or NULL if no salt is
119  provided.
120- ``sig_size`` is the size of the signature in bytes, or 0 if no
121  signature is provided.  Currently the signature is (somewhat
122  arbitrarily) limited to 16128 bytes.  See `Built-in signature
123  verification`_ for more information.
124- ``sig_ptr``  is the pointer to the signature, or NULL if no
125  signature is provided.
126- All reserved fields must be zeroed.
127
128FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY causes the filesystem to build a Merkle tree for
129the file and persist it to a filesystem-specific location associated
130with the file, then mark the file as a verity file.  This ioctl may
131take a long time to execute on large files, and it is interruptible by
132fatal signals.
133
134FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY checks for write access to the inode.  However,
135it must be executed on an O_RDONLY file descriptor and no processes
136can have the file open for writing.  Attempts to open the file for
137writing while this ioctl is executing will fail with ETXTBSY.  (This
138is necessary to guarantee that no writable file descriptors will exist
139after verity is enabled, and to guarantee that the file's contents are
140stable while the Merkle tree is being built over it.)
141
142On success, FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY returns 0, and the file becomes a
143verity file.  On failure (including the case of interruption by a
144fatal signal), no changes are made to the file.
145
146FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY can fail with the following errors:
147
148- ``EACCES``: the process does not have write access to the file
149- ``EBADMSG``: the signature is malformed
150- ``EBUSY``: this ioctl is already running on the file
151- ``EEXIST``: the file already has verity enabled
152- ``EFAULT``: the caller provided inaccessible memory
153- ``EINTR``: the operation was interrupted by a fatal signal
154- ``EINVAL``: unsupported version, hash algorithm, or block size; or
155  reserved bits are set; or the file descriptor refers to neither a
156  regular file nor a directory.
157- ``EISDIR``: the file descriptor refers to a directory
158- ``EKEYREJECTED``: the signature doesn't match the file
159- ``EMSGSIZE``: the salt or signature is too long
160- ``ENOKEY``: the fs-verity keyring doesn't contain the certificate
161  needed to verify the signature
162- ``ENOPKG``: fs-verity recognizes the hash algorithm, but it's not
163  available in the kernel's crypto API as currently configured (e.g.
164  for SHA-512, missing CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512).
165- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement fs-verity
166- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with fs-verity
167  support; or the filesystem superblock has not had the 'verity'
168  feature enabled on it; or the filesystem does not support fs-verity
169  on this file.  (See `Filesystem support`_.)
170- ``EPERM``: the file is append-only; or, a signature is required and
171  one was not provided.
172- ``EROFS``: the filesystem is read-only
173- ``ETXTBSY``: someone has the file open for writing.  This can be the
174  caller's file descriptor, another open file descriptor, or the file
175  reference held by a writable memory map.
176
177FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY
178---------------------
179
180The FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY ioctl retrieves the digest of a verity file.
181The fs-verity file digest is a cryptographic digest that identifies
182the file contents that are being enforced on reads; it is computed via
183a Merkle tree and is different from a traditional full-file digest.
184
185This ioctl takes in a pointer to a variable-length structure::
186
187    struct fsverity_digest {
188            __u16 digest_algorithm;
189            __u16 digest_size; /* input/output */
190            __u8 digest[];
191    };
192
193``digest_size`` is an input/output field.  On input, it must be
194initialized to the number of bytes allocated for the variable-length
195``digest`` field.
196
197On success, 0 is returned and the kernel fills in the structure as
198follows:
199
200- ``digest_algorithm`` will be the hash algorithm used for the file
201  digest.  It will match ``fsverity_enable_arg::hash_algorithm``.
202- ``digest_size`` will be the size of the digest in bytes, e.g. 32
203  for SHA-256.  (This can be redundant with ``digest_algorithm``.)
204- ``digest`` will be the actual bytes of the digest.
205
206FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY is guaranteed to execute in constant time,
207regardless of the size of the file.
208
209FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY can fail with the following errors:
210
211- ``EFAULT``: the caller provided inaccessible memory
212- ``ENODATA``: the file is not a verity file
213- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement fs-verity
214- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with fs-verity
215  support, or the filesystem superblock has not had the 'verity'
216  feature enabled on it.  (See `Filesystem support`_.)
217- ``EOVERFLOW``: the digest is longer than the specified
218  ``digest_size`` bytes.  Try providing a larger buffer.
219
220FS_IOC_GETFLAGS
221---------------
222
223The existing ioctl FS_IOC_GETFLAGS (which isn't specific to fs-verity)
224can also be used to check whether a file has fs-verity enabled or not.
225To do so, check for FS_VERITY_FL (0x00100000) in the returned flags.
226
227The verity flag is not settable via FS_IOC_SETFLAGS.  You must use
228FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY instead, since parameters must be provided.
229
230statx
231-----
232
233Since Linux v5.5, the statx() system call sets STATX_ATTR_VERITY if
234the file has fs-verity enabled.  This can perform better than
235FS_IOC_GETFLAGS and FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY because it doesn't require
236opening the file, and opening verity files can be expensive.
237
238Accessing verity files
239======================
240
241Applications can transparently access a verity file just like a
242non-verity one, with the following exceptions:
243
244- Verity files are readonly.  They cannot be opened for writing or
245  truncate()d, even if the file mode bits allow it.  Attempts to do
246  one of these things will fail with EPERM.  However, changes to
247  metadata such as owner, mode, timestamps, and xattrs are still
248  allowed, since these are not measured by fs-verity.  Verity files
249  can also still be renamed, deleted, and linked to.
250
251- Direct I/O is not supported on verity files.  Attempts to use direct
252  I/O on such files will fall back to buffered I/O.
253
254- DAX (Direct Access) is not supported on verity files, because this
255  would circumvent the data verification.
256
257- Reads of data that doesn't match the verity Merkle tree will fail
258  with EIO (for read()) or SIGBUS (for mmap() reads).
259
260- If the sysctl "fs.verity.require_signatures" is set to 1 and the
261  file is not signed by a key in the fs-verity keyring, then opening
262  the file will fail.  See `Built-in signature verification`_.
263
264Direct access to the Merkle tree is not supported.  Therefore, if a
265verity file is copied, or is backed up and restored, then it will lose
266its "verity"-ness.  fs-verity is primarily meant for files like
267executables that are managed by a package manager.
268
269File digest computation
270=======================
271
272This section describes how fs-verity hashes the file contents using a
273Merkle tree to produce the digest which cryptographically identifies
274the file contents.  This algorithm is the same for all filesystems
275that support fs-verity.
276
277Userspace only needs to be aware of this algorithm if it needs to
278compute fs-verity file digests itself, e.g. in order to sign files.
279
280.. _fsverity_merkle_tree:
281
282Merkle tree
283-----------
284
285The file contents is divided into blocks, where the block size is
286configurable but is usually 4096 bytes.  The end of the last block is
287zero-padded if needed.  Each block is then hashed, producing the first
288level of hashes.  Then, the hashes in this first level are grouped
289into 'blocksize'-byte blocks (zero-padding the ends as needed) and
290these blocks are hashed, producing the second level of hashes.  This
291proceeds up the tree until only a single block remains.  The hash of
292this block is the "Merkle tree root hash".
293
294If the file fits in one block and is nonempty, then the "Merkle tree
295root hash" is simply the hash of the single data block.  If the file
296is empty, then the "Merkle tree root hash" is all zeroes.
297
298The "blocks" here are not necessarily the same as "filesystem blocks".
299
300If a salt was specified, then it's zero-padded to the closest multiple
301of the input size of the hash algorithm's compression function, e.g.
30264 bytes for SHA-256 or 128 bytes for SHA-512.  The padded salt is
303prepended to every data or Merkle tree block that is hashed.
304
305The purpose of the block padding is to cause every hash to be taken
306over the same amount of data, which simplifies the implementation and
307keeps open more possibilities for hardware acceleration.  The purpose
308of the salt padding is to make the salting "free" when the salted hash
309state is precomputed, then imported for each hash.
310
311Example: in the recommended configuration of SHA-256 and 4K blocks,
312128 hash values fit in each block.  Thus, each level of the Merkle
313tree is approximately 128 times smaller than the previous, and for
314large files the Merkle tree's size converges to approximately 1/127 of
315the original file size.  However, for small files, the padding is
316significant, making the space overhead proportionally more.
317
318.. _fsverity_descriptor:
319
320fs-verity descriptor
321--------------------
322
323By itself, the Merkle tree root hash is ambiguous.  For example, it
324can't a distinguish a large file from a small second file whose data
325is exactly the top-level hash block of the first file.  Ambiguities
326also arise from the convention of padding to the next block boundary.
327
328To solve this problem, the fs-verity file digest is actually computed
329as a hash of the following structure, which contains the Merkle tree
330root hash as well as other fields such as the file size::
331
332    struct fsverity_descriptor {
333            __u8 version;           /* must be 1 */
334            __u8 hash_algorithm;    /* Merkle tree hash algorithm */
335            __u8 log_blocksize;     /* log2 of size of data and tree blocks */
336            __u8 salt_size;         /* size of salt in bytes; 0 if none */
337            __le32 __reserved_0x04; /* must be 0 */
338            __le64 data_size;       /* size of file the Merkle tree is built over */
339            __u8 root_hash[64];     /* Merkle tree root hash */
340            __u8 salt[32];          /* salt prepended to each hashed block */
341            __u8 __reserved[144];   /* must be 0's */
342    };
343
344Built-in signature verification
345===============================
346
347With CONFIG_FS_VERITY_BUILTIN_SIGNATURES=y, fs-verity supports putting
348a portion of an authentication policy (see `Use cases`_) in the
349kernel.  Specifically, it adds support for:
350
3511. At fs-verity module initialization time, a keyring ".fs-verity" is
352   created.  The root user can add trusted X.509 certificates to this
353   keyring using the add_key() system call, then (when done)
354   optionally use keyctl_restrict_keyring() to prevent additional
355   certificates from being added.
356
3572. `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_ accepts a pointer to a PKCS#7 formatted
358   detached signature in DER format of the file's fs-verity digest.
359   On success, this signature is persisted alongside the Merkle tree.
360   Then, any time the file is opened, the kernel will verify the
361   file's actual digest against this signature, using the certificates
362   in the ".fs-verity" keyring.
363
3643. A new sysctl "fs.verity.require_signatures" is made available.
365   When set to 1, the kernel requires that all verity files have a
366   correctly signed digest as described in (2).
367
368fs-verity file digests must be signed in the following format, which
369is similar to the structure used by `FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY`_::
370
371    struct fsverity_formatted_digest {
372            char magic[8];                  /* must be "FSVerity" */
373            __le16 digest_algorithm;
374            __le16 digest_size;
375            __u8 digest[];
376    };
377
378fs-verity's built-in signature verification support is meant as a
379relatively simple mechanism that can be used to provide some level of
380authenticity protection for verity files, as an alternative to doing
381the signature verification in userspace or using IMA-appraisal.
382However, with this mechanism, userspace programs still need to check
383that the verity bit is set, and there is no protection against verity
384files being swapped around.
385
386Filesystem support
387==================
388
389fs-verity is currently supported by the ext4 and f2fs filesystems.
390The CONFIG_FS_VERITY kconfig option must be enabled to use fs-verity
391on either filesystem.
392
393``include/linux/fsverity.h`` declares the interface between the
394``fs/verity/`` support layer and filesystems.  Briefly, filesystems
395must provide an ``fsverity_operations`` structure that provides
396methods to read and write the verity metadata to a filesystem-specific
397location, including the Merkle tree blocks and
398``fsverity_descriptor``.  Filesystems must also call functions in
399``fs/verity/`` at certain times, such as when a file is opened or when
400pages have been read into the pagecache.  (See `Verifying data`_.)
401
402ext4
403----
404
405ext4 supports fs-verity since Linux v5.4 and e2fsprogs v1.45.2.
406
407To create verity files on an ext4 filesystem, the filesystem must have
408been formatted with ``-O verity`` or had ``tune2fs -O verity`` run on
409it.  "verity" is an RO_COMPAT filesystem feature, so once set, old
410kernels will only be able to mount the filesystem readonly, and old
411versions of e2fsck will be unable to check the filesystem.  Moreover,
412currently ext4 only supports mounting a filesystem with the "verity"
413feature when its block size is equal to PAGE_SIZE (often 4096 bytes).
414
415ext4 sets the EXT4_VERITY_FL on-disk inode flag on verity files.  It
416can only be set by `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_, and it cannot be cleared.
417
418ext4 also supports encryption, which can be used simultaneously with
419fs-verity.  In this case, the plaintext data is verified rather than
420the ciphertext.  This is necessary in order to make the fs-verity file
421digest meaningful, since every file is encrypted differently.
422
423ext4 stores the verity metadata (Merkle tree and fsverity_descriptor)
424past the end of the file, starting at the first 64K boundary beyond
425i_size.  This approach works because (a) verity files are readonly,
426and (b) pages fully beyond i_size aren't visible to userspace but can
427be read/written internally by ext4 with only some relatively small
428changes to ext4.  This approach avoids having to depend on the
429EA_INODE feature and on rearchitecturing ext4's xattr support to
430support paging multi-gigabyte xattrs into memory, and to support
431encrypting xattrs.  Note that the verity metadata *must* be encrypted
432when the file is, since it contains hashes of the plaintext data.
433
434Currently, ext4 verity only supports the case where the Merkle tree
435block size, filesystem block size, and page size are all the same.  It
436also only supports extent-based files.
437
438f2fs
439----
440
441f2fs supports fs-verity since Linux v5.4 and f2fs-tools v1.11.0.
442
443To create verity files on an f2fs filesystem, the filesystem must have
444been formatted with ``-O verity``.
445
446f2fs sets the FADVISE_VERITY_BIT on-disk inode flag on verity files.
447It can only be set by `FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY`_, and it cannot be
448cleared.
449
450Like ext4, f2fs stores the verity metadata (Merkle tree and
451fsverity_descriptor) past the end of the file, starting at the first
45264K boundary beyond i_size.  See explanation for ext4 above.
453Moreover, f2fs supports at most 4096 bytes of xattr entries per inode
454which wouldn't be enough for even a single Merkle tree block.
455
456Currently, f2fs verity only supports a Merkle tree block size of 4096.
457Also, f2fs doesn't support enabling verity on files that currently
458have atomic or volatile writes pending.
459
460Implementation details
461======================
462
463Verifying data
464--------------
465
466fs-verity ensures that all reads of a verity file's data are verified,
467regardless of which syscall is used to do the read (e.g. mmap(),
468read(), pread()) and regardless of whether it's the first read or a
469later read (unless the later read can return cached data that was
470already verified).  Below, we describe how filesystems implement this.
471
472Pagecache
473~~~~~~~~~
474
475For filesystems using Linux's pagecache, the ``->readpage()`` and
476``->readpages()`` methods must be modified to verify pages before they
477are marked Uptodate.  Merely hooking ``->read_iter()`` would be
478insufficient, since ``->read_iter()`` is not used for memory maps.
479
480Therefore, fs/verity/ provides a function fsverity_verify_page() which
481verifies a page that has been read into the pagecache of a verity
482inode, but is still locked and not Uptodate, so it's not yet readable
483by userspace.  As needed to do the verification,
484fsverity_verify_page() will call back into the filesystem to read
485Merkle tree pages via fsverity_operations::read_merkle_tree_page().
486
487fsverity_verify_page() returns false if verification failed; in this
488case, the filesystem must not set the page Uptodate.  Following this,
489as per the usual Linux pagecache behavior, attempts by userspace to
490read() from the part of the file containing the page will fail with
491EIO, and accesses to the page within a memory map will raise SIGBUS.
492
493fsverity_verify_page() currently only supports the case where the
494Merkle tree block size is equal to PAGE_SIZE (often 4096 bytes).
495
496In principle, fsverity_verify_page() verifies the entire path in the
497Merkle tree from the data page to the root hash.  However, for
498efficiency the filesystem may cache the hash pages.  Therefore,
499fsverity_verify_page() only ascends the tree reading hash pages until
500an already-verified hash page is seen, as indicated by the PageChecked
501bit being set.  It then verifies the path to that page.
502
503This optimization, which is also used by dm-verity, results in
504excellent sequential read performance.  This is because usually (e.g.
505127 in 128 times for 4K blocks and SHA-256) the hash page from the
506bottom level of the tree will already be cached and checked from
507reading a previous data page.  However, random reads perform worse.
508
509Block device based filesystems
510~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
511
512Block device based filesystems (e.g. ext4 and f2fs) in Linux also use
513the pagecache, so the above subsection applies too.  However, they
514also usually read many pages from a file at once, grouped into a
515structure called a "bio".  To make it easier for these types of
516filesystems to support fs-verity, fs/verity/ also provides a function
517fsverity_verify_bio() which verifies all pages in a bio.
518
519ext4 and f2fs also support encryption.  If a verity file is also
520encrypted, the pages must be decrypted before being verified.  To
521support this, these filesystems allocate a "post-read context" for
522each bio and store it in ``->bi_private``::
523
524    struct bio_post_read_ctx {
525           struct bio *bio;
526           struct work_struct work;
527           unsigned int cur_step;
528           unsigned int enabled_steps;
529    };
530
531``enabled_steps`` is a bitmask that specifies whether decryption,
532verity, or both is enabled.  After the bio completes, for each needed
533postprocessing step the filesystem enqueues the bio_post_read_ctx on a
534workqueue, and then the workqueue work does the decryption or
535verification.  Finally, pages where no decryption or verity error
536occurred are marked Uptodate, and the pages are unlocked.
537
538Files on ext4 and f2fs may contain holes.  Normally, ``->readpages()``
539simply zeroes holes and sets the corresponding pages Uptodate; no bios
540are issued.  To prevent this case from bypassing fs-verity, these
541filesystems use fsverity_verify_page() to verify hole pages.
542
543ext4 and f2fs disable direct I/O on verity files, since otherwise
544direct I/O would bypass fs-verity.  (They also do the same for
545encrypted files.)
546
547Userspace utility
548=================
549
550This document focuses on the kernel, but a userspace utility for
551fs-verity can be found at:
552
553	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/fsverity-utils.git
554
555See the README.md file in the fsverity-utils source tree for details,
556including examples of setting up fs-verity protected files.
557
558Tests
559=====
560
561To test fs-verity, use xfstests.  For example, using `kvm-xfstests
562<https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/kvm-quickstart.md>`_::
563
564    kvm-xfstests -c ext4,f2fs -g verity
565
566FAQ
567===
568
569This section answers frequently asked questions about fs-verity that
570weren't already directly answered in other parts of this document.
571
572:Q: Why isn't fs-verity part of IMA?
573:A: fs-verity and IMA (Integrity Measurement Architecture) have
574    different focuses.  fs-verity is a filesystem-level mechanism for
575    hashing individual files using a Merkle tree.  In contrast, IMA
576    specifies a system-wide policy that specifies which files are
577    hashed and what to do with those hashes, such as log them,
578    authenticate them, or add them to a measurement list.
579
580    IMA is planned to support the fs-verity hashing mechanism as an
581    alternative to doing full file hashes, for people who want the
582    performance and security benefits of the Merkle tree based hash.
583    But it doesn't make sense to force all uses of fs-verity to be
584    through IMA.  As a standalone filesystem feature, fs-verity
585    already meets many users' needs, and it's testable like other
586    filesystem features e.g. with xfstests.
587
588:Q: Isn't fs-verity useless because the attacker can just modify the
589    hashes in the Merkle tree, which is stored on-disk?
590:A: To verify the authenticity of an fs-verity file you must verify
591    the authenticity of the "fs-verity file digest", which
592    incorporates the root hash of the Merkle tree.  See `Use cases`_.
593
594:Q: Isn't fs-verity useless because the attacker can just replace a
595    verity file with a non-verity one?
596:A: See `Use cases`_.  In the initial use case, it's really trusted
597    userspace code that authenticates the files; fs-verity is just a
598    tool to do this job efficiently and securely.  The trusted
599    userspace code will consider non-verity files to be inauthentic.
600
601:Q: Why does the Merkle tree need to be stored on-disk?  Couldn't you
602    store just the root hash?
603:A: If the Merkle tree wasn't stored on-disk, then you'd have to
604    compute the entire tree when the file is first accessed, even if
605    just one byte is being read.  This is a fundamental consequence of
606    how Merkle tree hashing works.  To verify a leaf node, you need to
607    verify the whole path to the root hash, including the root node
608    (the thing which the root hash is a hash of).  But if the root
609    node isn't stored on-disk, you have to compute it by hashing its
610    children, and so on until you've actually hashed the entire file.
611
612    That defeats most of the point of doing a Merkle tree-based hash,
613    since if you have to hash the whole file ahead of time anyway,
614    then you could simply do sha256(file) instead.  That would be much
615    simpler, and a bit faster too.
616
617    It's true that an in-memory Merkle tree could still provide the
618    advantage of verification on every read rather than just on the
619    first read.  However, it would be inefficient because every time a
620    hash page gets evicted (you can't pin the entire Merkle tree into
621    memory, since it may be very large), in order to restore it you
622    again need to hash everything below it in the tree.  This again
623    defeats most of the point of doing a Merkle tree-based hash, since
624    a single block read could trigger re-hashing gigabytes of data.
625
626:Q: But couldn't you store just the leaf nodes and compute the rest?
627:A: See previous answer; this really just moves up one level, since
628    one could alternatively interpret the data blocks as being the
629    leaf nodes of the Merkle tree.  It's true that the tree can be
630    computed much faster if the leaf level is stored rather than just
631    the data, but that's only because each level is less than 1% the
632    size of the level below (assuming the recommended settings of
633    SHA-256 and 4K blocks).  For the exact same reason, by storing
634    "just the leaf nodes" you'd already be storing over 99% of the
635    tree, so you might as well simply store the whole tree.
636
637:Q: Can the Merkle tree be built ahead of time, e.g. distributed as
638    part of a package that is installed to many computers?
639:A: This isn't currently supported.  It was part of the original
640    design, but was removed to simplify the kernel UAPI and because it
641    wasn't a critical use case.  Files are usually installed once and
642    used many times, and cryptographic hashing is somewhat fast on
643    most modern processors.
644
645:Q: Why doesn't fs-verity support writes?
646:A: Write support would be very difficult and would require a
647    completely different design, so it's well outside the scope of
648    fs-verity.  Write support would require:
649
650    - A way to maintain consistency between the data and hashes,
651      including all levels of hashes, since corruption after a crash
652      (especially of potentially the entire file!) is unacceptable.
653      The main options for solving this are data journalling,
654      copy-on-write, and log-structured volume.  But it's very hard to
655      retrofit existing filesystems with new consistency mechanisms.
656      Data journalling is available on ext4, but is very slow.
657
658    - Rebuilding the Merkle tree after every write, which would be
659      extremely inefficient.  Alternatively, a different authenticated
660      dictionary structure such as an "authenticated skiplist" could
661      be used.  However, this would be far more complex.
662
663    Compare it to dm-verity vs. dm-integrity.  dm-verity is very
664    simple: the kernel just verifies read-only data against a
665    read-only Merkle tree.  In contrast, dm-integrity supports writes
666    but is slow, is much more complex, and doesn't actually support
667    full-device authentication since it authenticates each sector
668    independently, i.e. there is no "root hash".  It doesn't really
669    make sense for the same device-mapper target to support these two
670    very different cases; the same applies to fs-verity.
671
672:Q: Since verity files are immutable, why isn't the immutable bit set?
673:A: The existing "immutable" bit (FS_IMMUTABLE_FL) already has a
674    specific set of semantics which not only make the file contents
675    read-only, but also prevent the file from being deleted, renamed,
676    linked to, or having its owner or mode changed.  These extra
677    properties are unwanted for fs-verity, so reusing the immutable
678    bit isn't appropriate.
679
680:Q: Why does the API use ioctls instead of setxattr() and getxattr()?
681:A: Abusing the xattr interface for basically arbitrary syscalls is
682    heavily frowned upon by most of the Linux filesystem developers.
683    An xattr should really just be an xattr on-disk, not an API to
684    e.g. magically trigger construction of a Merkle tree.
685
686:Q: Does fs-verity support remote filesystems?
687:A: Only ext4 and f2fs support is implemented currently, but in
688    principle any filesystem that can store per-file verity metadata
689    can support fs-verity, regardless of whether it's local or remote.
690    Some filesystems may have fewer options of where to store the
691    verity metadata; one possibility is to store it past the end of
692    the file and "hide" it from userspace by manipulating i_size.  The
693    data verification functions provided by ``fs/verity/`` also assume
694    that the filesystem uses the Linux pagecache, but both local and
695    remote filesystems normally do so.
696
697:Q: Why is anything filesystem-specific at all?  Shouldn't fs-verity
698    be implemented entirely at the VFS level?
699:A: There are many reasons why this is not possible or would be very
700    difficult, including the following:
701
702    - To prevent bypassing verification, pages must not be marked
703      Uptodate until they've been verified.  Currently, each
704      filesystem is responsible for marking pages Uptodate via
705      ``->readpages()``.  Therefore, currently it's not possible for
706      the VFS to do the verification on its own.  Changing this would
707      require significant changes to the VFS and all filesystems.
708
709    - It would require defining a filesystem-independent way to store
710      the verity metadata.  Extended attributes don't work for this
711      because (a) the Merkle tree may be gigabytes, but many
712      filesystems assume that all xattrs fit into a single 4K
713      filesystem block, and (b) ext4 and f2fs encryption doesn't
714      encrypt xattrs, yet the Merkle tree *must* be encrypted when the
715      file contents are, because it stores hashes of the plaintext
716      file contents.
717
718      So the verity metadata would have to be stored in an actual
719      file.  Using a separate file would be very ugly, since the
720      metadata is fundamentally part of the file to be protected, and
721      it could cause problems where users could delete the real file
722      but not the metadata file or vice versa.  On the other hand,
723      having it be in the same file would break applications unless
724      filesystems' notion of i_size were divorced from the VFS's,
725      which would be complex and require changes to all filesystems.
726
727    - It's desirable that FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY uses the filesystem's
728      transaction mechanism so that either the file ends up with
729      verity enabled, or no changes were made.  Allowing intermediate
730      states to occur after a crash may cause problems.
731