1=====================================
2Filesystem-level encryption (fscrypt)
3=====================================
4
5Introduction
6============
7
8fscrypt is a library which filesystems can hook into to support
9transparent encryption of files and directories.
10
11Note: "fscrypt" in this document refers to the kernel-level portion,
12implemented in ``fs/crypto/``, as opposed to the userspace tool
13`fscrypt <https://github.com/google/fscrypt>`_.  This document only
14covers the kernel-level portion.  For command-line examples of how to
15use encryption, see the documentation for the userspace tool `fscrypt
16<https://github.com/google/fscrypt>`_.  Also, it is recommended to use
17the fscrypt userspace tool, or other existing userspace tools such as
18`fscryptctl <https://github.com/google/fscryptctl>`_ or `Android's key
19management system
20<https://source.android.com/security/encryption/file-based>`_, over
21using the kernel's API directly.  Using existing tools reduces the
22chance of introducing your own security bugs.  (Nevertheless, for
23completeness this documentation covers the kernel's API anyway.)
24
25Unlike dm-crypt, fscrypt operates at the filesystem level rather than
26at the block device level.  This allows it to encrypt different files
27with different keys and to have unencrypted files on the same
28filesystem.  This is useful for multi-user systems where each user's
29data-at-rest needs to be cryptographically isolated from the others.
30However, except for filenames, fscrypt does not encrypt filesystem
31metadata.
32
33Unlike eCryptfs, which is a stacked filesystem, fscrypt is integrated
34directly into supported filesystems --- currently ext4, F2FS, and
35UBIFS.  This allows encrypted files to be read and written without
36caching both the decrypted and encrypted pages in the pagecache,
37thereby nearly halving the memory used and bringing it in line with
38unencrypted files.  Similarly, half as many dentries and inodes are
39needed.  eCryptfs also limits encrypted filenames to 143 bytes,
40causing application compatibility issues; fscrypt allows the full 255
41bytes (NAME_MAX).  Finally, unlike eCryptfs, the fscrypt API can be
42used by unprivileged users, with no need to mount anything.
43
44fscrypt does not support encrypting files in-place.  Instead, it
45supports marking an empty directory as encrypted.  Then, after
46userspace provides the key, all regular files, directories, and
47symbolic links created in that directory tree are transparently
48encrypted.
49
50Threat model
51============
52
53Offline attacks
54---------------
55
56Provided that userspace chooses a strong encryption key, fscrypt
57protects the confidentiality of file contents and filenames in the
58event of a single point-in-time permanent offline compromise of the
59block device content.  fscrypt does not protect the confidentiality of
60non-filename metadata, e.g. file sizes, file permissions, file
61timestamps, and extended attributes.  Also, the existence and location
62of holes (unallocated blocks which logically contain all zeroes) in
63files is not protected.
64
65fscrypt is not guaranteed to protect confidentiality or authenticity
66if an attacker is able to manipulate the filesystem offline prior to
67an authorized user later accessing the filesystem.
68
69Online attacks
70--------------
71
72fscrypt (and storage encryption in general) can only provide limited
73protection, if any at all, against online attacks.  In detail:
74
75Side-channel attacks
76~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
77
78fscrypt is only resistant to side-channel attacks, such as timing or
79electromagnetic attacks, to the extent that the underlying Linux
80Cryptographic API algorithms are.  If a vulnerable algorithm is used,
81such as a table-based implementation of AES, it may be possible for an
82attacker to mount a side channel attack against the online system.
83Side channel attacks may also be mounted against applications
84consuming decrypted data.
85
86Unauthorized file access
87~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
88
89After an encryption key has been added, fscrypt does not hide the
90plaintext file contents or filenames from other users on the same
91system.  Instead, existing access control mechanisms such as file mode
92bits, POSIX ACLs, LSMs, or namespaces should be used for this purpose.
93
94(For the reasoning behind this, understand that while the key is
95added, the confidentiality of the data, from the perspective of the
96system itself, is *not* protected by the mathematical properties of
97encryption but rather only by the correctness of the kernel.
98Therefore, any encryption-specific access control checks would merely
99be enforced by kernel *code* and therefore would be largely redundant
100with the wide variety of access control mechanisms already available.)
101
102Kernel memory compromise
103~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
104
105An attacker who compromises the system enough to read from arbitrary
106memory, e.g. by mounting a physical attack or by exploiting a kernel
107security vulnerability, can compromise all encryption keys that are
108currently in use.
109
110However, fscrypt allows encryption keys to be removed from the kernel,
111which may protect them from later compromise.
112
113In more detail, the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl (or the
114FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS ioctl) can wipe a master
115encryption key from kernel memory.  If it does so, it will also try to
116evict all cached inodes which had been "unlocked" using the key,
117thereby wiping their per-file keys and making them once again appear
118"locked", i.e. in ciphertext or encrypted form.
119
120However, these ioctls have some limitations:
121
122- Per-file keys for in-use files will *not* be removed or wiped.
123  Therefore, for maximum effect, userspace should close the relevant
124  encrypted files and directories before removing a master key, as
125  well as kill any processes whose working directory is in an affected
126  encrypted directory.
127
128- The kernel cannot magically wipe copies of the master key(s) that
129  userspace might have as well.  Therefore, userspace must wipe all
130  copies of the master key(s) it makes as well; normally this should
131  be done immediately after FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY, without waiting
132  for FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY.  Naturally, the same also applies
133  to all higher levels in the key hierarchy.  Userspace should also
134  follow other security precautions such as mlock()ing memory
135  containing keys to prevent it from being swapped out.
136
137- In general, decrypted contents and filenames in the kernel VFS
138  caches are freed but not wiped.  Therefore, portions thereof may be
139  recoverable from freed memory, even after the corresponding key(s)
140  were wiped.  To partially solve this, you can set
141  CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING=y in your kernel config and add page_poison=1
142  to your kernel command line.  However, this has a performance cost.
143
144- Secret keys might still exist in CPU registers, in crypto
145  accelerator hardware (if used by the crypto API to implement any of
146  the algorithms), or in other places not explicitly considered here.
147
148Limitations of v1 policies
149~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
150
151v1 encryption policies have some weaknesses with respect to online
152attacks:
153
154- There is no verification that the provided master key is correct.
155  Therefore, a malicious user can temporarily associate the wrong key
156  with another user's encrypted files to which they have read-only
157  access.  Because of filesystem caching, the wrong key will then be
158  used by the other user's accesses to those files, even if the other
159  user has the correct key in their own keyring.  This violates the
160  meaning of "read-only access".
161
162- A compromise of a per-file key also compromises the master key from
163  which it was derived.
164
165- Non-root users cannot securely remove encryption keys.
166
167All the above problems are fixed with v2 encryption policies.  For
168this reason among others, it is recommended to use v2 encryption
169policies on all new encrypted directories.
170
171Key hierarchy
172=============
173
174Master Keys
175-----------
176
177Each encrypted directory tree is protected by a *master key*.  Master
178keys can be up to 64 bytes long, and must be at least as long as the
179greater of the key length needed by the contents and filenames
180encryption modes being used.  For example, if AES-256-XTS is used for
181contents encryption, the master key must be 64 bytes (512 bits).  Note
182that the XTS mode is defined to require a key twice as long as that
183required by the underlying block cipher.
184
185To "unlock" an encrypted directory tree, userspace must provide the
186appropriate master key.  There can be any number of master keys, each
187of which protects any number of directory trees on any number of
188filesystems.
189
190Master keys must be real cryptographic keys, i.e. indistinguishable
191from random bytestrings of the same length.  This implies that users
192**must not** directly use a password as a master key, zero-pad a
193shorter key, or repeat a shorter key.  Security cannot be guaranteed
194if userspace makes any such error, as the cryptographic proofs and
195analysis would no longer apply.
196
197Instead, users should generate master keys either using a
198cryptographically secure random number generator, or by using a KDF
199(Key Derivation Function).  The kernel does not do any key stretching;
200therefore, if userspace derives the key from a low-entropy secret such
201as a passphrase, it is critical that a KDF designed for this purpose
202be used, such as scrypt, PBKDF2, or Argon2.
203
204Key derivation function
205-----------------------
206
207With one exception, fscrypt never uses the master key(s) for
208encryption directly.  Instead, they are only used as input to a KDF
209(Key Derivation Function) to derive the actual keys.
210
211The KDF used for a particular master key differs depending on whether
212the key is used for v1 encryption policies or for v2 encryption
213policies.  Users **must not** use the same key for both v1 and v2
214encryption policies.  (No real-world attack is currently known on this
215specific case of key reuse, but its security cannot be guaranteed
216since the cryptographic proofs and analysis would no longer apply.)
217
218For v1 encryption policies, the KDF only supports deriving per-file
219encryption keys.  It works by encrypting the master key with
220AES-128-ECB, using the file's 16-byte nonce as the AES key.  The
221resulting ciphertext is used as the derived key.  If the ciphertext is
222longer than needed, then it is truncated to the needed length.
223
224For v2 encryption policies, the KDF is HKDF-SHA512.  The master key is
225passed as the "input keying material", no salt is used, and a distinct
226"application-specific information string" is used for each distinct
227key to be derived.  For example, when a per-file encryption key is
228derived, the application-specific information string is the file's
229nonce prefixed with "fscrypt\\0" and a context byte.  Different
230context bytes are used for other types of derived keys.
231
232HKDF-SHA512 is preferred to the original AES-128-ECB based KDF because
233HKDF is more flexible, is nonreversible, and evenly distributes
234entropy from the master key.  HKDF is also standardized and widely
235used by other software, whereas the AES-128-ECB based KDF is ad-hoc.
236
237Per-file encryption keys
238------------------------
239
240Since each master key can protect many files, it is necessary to
241"tweak" the encryption of each file so that the same plaintext in two
242files doesn't map to the same ciphertext, or vice versa.  In most
243cases, fscrypt does this by deriving per-file keys.  When a new
244encrypted inode (regular file, directory, or symlink) is created,
245fscrypt randomly generates a 16-byte nonce and stores it in the
246inode's encryption xattr.  Then, it uses a KDF (as described in `Key
247derivation function`_) to derive the file's key from the master key
248and nonce.
249
250Key derivation was chosen over key wrapping because wrapped keys would
251require larger xattrs which would be less likely to fit in-line in the
252filesystem's inode table, and there didn't appear to be any
253significant advantages to key wrapping.  In particular, currently
254there is no requirement to support unlocking a file with multiple
255alternative master keys or to support rotating master keys.  Instead,
256the master keys may be wrapped in userspace, e.g. as is done by the
257`fscrypt <https://github.com/google/fscrypt>`_ tool.
258
259DIRECT_KEY policies
260-------------------
261
262The Adiantum encryption mode (see `Encryption modes and usage`_) is
263suitable for both contents and filenames encryption, and it accepts
264long IVs --- long enough to hold both an 8-byte logical block number
265and a 16-byte per-file nonce.  Also, the overhead of each Adiantum key
266is greater than that of an AES-256-XTS key.
267
268Therefore, to improve performance and save memory, for Adiantum a
269"direct key" configuration is supported.  When the user has enabled
270this by setting FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY in the fscrypt policy,
271per-file encryption keys are not used.  Instead, whenever any data
272(contents or filenames) is encrypted, the file's 16-byte nonce is
273included in the IV.  Moreover:
274
275- For v1 encryption policies, the encryption is done directly with the
276  master key.  Because of this, users **must not** use the same master
277  key for any other purpose, even for other v1 policies.
278
279- For v2 encryption policies, the encryption is done with a per-mode
280  key derived using the KDF.  Users may use the same master key for
281  other v2 encryption policies.
282
283IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies
284-----------------------
285
286When FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64 is set in the fscrypt policy,
287the encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode
288number, and filesystem UUID.  This normally results in all files
289protected by the same master key sharing a single contents encryption
290key and a single filenames encryption key.  To still encrypt different
291files' data differently, inode numbers are included in the IVs.
292Consequently, shrinking the filesystem may not be allowed.
293
294This format is optimized for use with inline encryption hardware
295compliant with the UFS or eMMC standards, which support only 64 IV
296bits per I/O request and may have only a small number of keyslots.
297
298Key identifiers
299---------------
300
301For master keys used for v2 encryption policies, a unique 16-byte "key
302identifier" is also derived using the KDF.  This value is stored in
303the clear, since it is needed to reliably identify the key itself.
304
305Dirhash keys
306------------
307
308For directories that are indexed using a secret-keyed dirhash over the
309plaintext filenames, the KDF is also used to derive a 128-bit
310SipHash-2-4 key per directory in order to hash filenames.  This works
311just like deriving a per-file encryption key, except that a different
312KDF context is used.  Currently, only casefolded ("case-insensitive")
313encrypted directories use this style of hashing.
314
315Encryption modes and usage
316==========================
317
318fscrypt allows one encryption mode to be specified for file contents
319and one encryption mode to be specified for filenames.  Different
320directory trees are permitted to use different encryption modes.
321Currently, the following pairs of encryption modes are supported:
322
323- AES-256-XTS for contents and AES-256-CTS-CBC for filenames
324- AES-128-CBC for contents and AES-128-CTS-CBC for filenames
325- Adiantum for both contents and filenames
326
327If unsure, you should use the (AES-256-XTS, AES-256-CTS-CBC) pair.
328
329AES-128-CBC was added only for low-powered embedded devices with
330crypto accelerators such as CAAM or CESA that do not support XTS.  To
331use AES-128-CBC, CONFIG_CRYPTO_ESSIV and CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256 (or
332another SHA-256 implementation) must be enabled so that ESSIV can be
333used.
334
335Adiantum is a (primarily) stream cipher-based mode that is fast even
336on CPUs without dedicated crypto instructions.  It's also a true
337wide-block mode, unlike XTS.  It can also eliminate the need to derive
338per-file encryption keys.  However, it depends on the security of two
339primitives, XChaCha12 and AES-256, rather than just one.  See the
340paper "Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level
341processors" (https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details.
342To use Adiantum, CONFIG_CRYPTO_ADIANTUM must be enabled.  Also, fast
343implementations of ChaCha and NHPoly1305 should be enabled, e.g.
344CONFIG_CRYPTO_CHACHA20_NEON and CONFIG_CRYPTO_NHPOLY1305_NEON for ARM.
345
346New encryption modes can be added relatively easily, without changes
347to individual filesystems.  However, authenticated encryption (AE)
348modes are not currently supported because of the difficulty of dealing
349with ciphertext expansion.
350
351Contents encryption
352-------------------
353
354For file contents, each filesystem block is encrypted independently.
355Starting from Linux kernel 5.5, encryption of filesystems with block
356size less than system's page size is supported.
357
358Each block's IV is set to the logical block number within the file as
359a little endian number, except that:
360
361- With CBC mode encryption, ESSIV is also used.  Specifically, each IV
362  is encrypted with AES-256 where the AES-256 key is the SHA-256 hash
363  of the file's data encryption key.
364
365- With `DIRECT_KEY policies`_, the file's nonce is appended to the IV.
366  Currently this is only allowed with the Adiantum encryption mode.
367
368- With `IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies`_, the logical block number is limited
369  to 32 bits and is placed in bits 0-31 of the IV.  The inode number
370  (which is also limited to 32 bits) is placed in bits 32-63.
371
372Note that because file logical block numbers are included in the IVs,
373filesystems must enforce that blocks are never shifted around within
374encrypted files, e.g. via "collapse range" or "insert range".
375
376Filenames encryption
377--------------------
378
379For filenames, each full filename is encrypted at once.  Because of
380the requirements to retain support for efficient directory lookups and
381filenames of up to 255 bytes, the same IV is used for every filename
382in a directory.
383
384However, each encrypted directory still uses a unique key, or
385alternatively has the file's nonce (for `DIRECT_KEY policies`_) or
386inode number (for `IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies`_) included in the IVs.
387Thus, IV reuse is limited to within a single directory.
388
389With CTS-CBC, the IV reuse means that when the plaintext filenames
390share a common prefix at least as long as the cipher block size (16
391bytes for AES), the corresponding encrypted filenames will also share
392a common prefix.  This is undesirable.  Adiantum does not have this
393weakness, as it is a wide-block encryption mode.
394
395All supported filenames encryption modes accept any plaintext length
396>= 16 bytes; cipher block alignment is not required.  However,
397filenames shorter than 16 bytes are NUL-padded to 16 bytes before
398being encrypted.  In addition, to reduce leakage of filename lengths
399via their ciphertexts, all filenames are NUL-padded to the next 4, 8,
40016, or 32-byte boundary (configurable).  32 is recommended since this
401provides the best confidentiality, at the cost of making directory
402entries consume slightly more space.  Note that since NUL (``\0``) is
403not otherwise a valid character in filenames, the padding will never
404produce duplicate plaintexts.
405
406Symbolic link targets are considered a type of filename and are
407encrypted in the same way as filenames in directory entries, except
408that IV reuse is not a problem as each symlink has its own inode.
409
410User API
411========
412
413Setting an encryption policy
414----------------------------
415
416FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY
417~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
418
419The FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl sets an encryption policy on an
420empty directory or verifies that a directory or regular file already
421has the specified encryption policy.  It takes in a pointer to a
422:c:type:`struct fscrypt_policy_v1` or a :c:type:`struct
423fscrypt_policy_v2`, defined as follows::
424
425    #define FSCRYPT_POLICY_V1               0
426    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE     8
427    struct fscrypt_policy_v1 {
428            __u8 version;
429            __u8 contents_encryption_mode;
430            __u8 filenames_encryption_mode;
431            __u8 flags;
432            __u8 master_key_descriptor[FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE];
433    };
434    #define fscrypt_policy  fscrypt_policy_v1
435
436    #define FSCRYPT_POLICY_V2               2
437    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE     16
438    struct fscrypt_policy_v2 {
439            __u8 version;
440            __u8 contents_encryption_mode;
441            __u8 filenames_encryption_mode;
442            __u8 flags;
443            __u8 __reserved[4];
444            __u8 master_key_identifier[FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE];
445    };
446
447This structure must be initialized as follows:
448
449- ``version`` must be FSCRYPT_POLICY_V1 (0) if the struct is
450  :c:type:`fscrypt_policy_v1` or FSCRYPT_POLICY_V2 (2) if the struct
451  is :c:type:`fscrypt_policy_v2`.  (Note: we refer to the original
452  policy version as "v1", though its version code is really 0.)  For
453  new encrypted directories, use v2 policies.
454
455- ``contents_encryption_mode`` and ``filenames_encryption_mode`` must
456  be set to constants from ``<linux/fscrypt.h>`` which identify the
457  encryption modes to use.  If unsure, use FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_XTS
458  (1) for ``contents_encryption_mode`` and FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_CTS
459  (4) for ``filenames_encryption_mode``.
460
461- ``flags`` contains optional flags from ``<linux/fscrypt.h>``:
462
463  - FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_*: The amount of NUL padding to use when
464    encrypting filenames.  If unsure, use FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32
465    (0x3).
466  - FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY: See `DIRECT_KEY policies`_.
467  - FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64: See `IV_INO_LBLK_64
468    policies`_.  This is mutually exclusive with DIRECT_KEY and is not
469    supported on v1 policies.
470
471- For v2 encryption policies, ``__reserved`` must be zeroed.
472
473- For v1 encryption policies, ``master_key_descriptor`` specifies how
474  to find the master key in a keyring; see `Adding keys`_.  It is up
475  to userspace to choose a unique ``master_key_descriptor`` for each
476  master key.  The e4crypt and fscrypt tools use the first 8 bytes of
477  ``SHA-512(SHA-512(master_key))``, but this particular scheme is not
478  required.  Also, the master key need not be in the keyring yet when
479  FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY is executed.  However, it must be added
480  before any files can be created in the encrypted directory.
481
482  For v2 encryption policies, ``master_key_descriptor`` has been
483  replaced with ``master_key_identifier``, which is longer and cannot
484  be arbitrarily chosen.  Instead, the key must first be added using
485  `FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_.  Then, the ``key_spec.u.identifier``
486  the kernel returned in the :c:type:`struct fscrypt_add_key_arg` must
487  be used as the ``master_key_identifier`` in the :c:type:`struct
488  fscrypt_policy_v2`.
489
490If the file is not yet encrypted, then FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY
491verifies that the file is an empty directory.  If so, the specified
492encryption policy is assigned to the directory, turning it into an
493encrypted directory.  After that, and after providing the
494corresponding master key as described in `Adding keys`_, all regular
495files, directories (recursively), and symlinks created in the
496directory will be encrypted, inheriting the same encryption policy.
497The filenames in the directory's entries will be encrypted as well.
498
499Alternatively, if the file is already encrypted, then
500FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY validates that the specified encryption
501policy exactly matches the actual one.  If they match, then the ioctl
502returns 0.  Otherwise, it fails with EEXIST.  This works on both
503regular files and directories, including nonempty directories.
504
505When a v2 encryption policy is assigned to a directory, it is also
506required that either the specified key has been added by the current
507user or that the caller has CAP_FOWNER in the initial user namespace.
508(This is needed to prevent a user from encrypting their data with
509another user's key.)  The key must remain added while
510FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY is executing.  However, if the new
511encrypted directory does not need to be accessed immediately, then the
512key can be removed right away afterwards.
513
514Note that the ext4 filesystem does not allow the root directory to be
515encrypted, even if it is empty.  Users who want to encrypt an entire
516filesystem with one key should consider using dm-crypt instead.
517
518FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY can fail with the following errors:
519
520- ``EACCES``: the file is not owned by the process's uid, nor does the
521  process have the CAP_FOWNER capability in a namespace with the file
522  owner's uid mapped
523- ``EEXIST``: the file is already encrypted with an encryption policy
524  different from the one specified
525- ``EINVAL``: an invalid encryption policy was specified (invalid
526  version, mode(s), or flags; or reserved bits were set); or a v1
527  encryption policy was specified but the directory has the casefold
528  flag enabled (casefolding is incompatible with v1 policies).
529- ``ENOKEY``: a v2 encryption policy was specified, but the key with
530  the specified ``master_key_identifier`` has not been added, nor does
531  the process have the CAP_FOWNER capability in the initial user
532  namespace
533- ``ENOTDIR``: the file is unencrypted and is a regular file, not a
534  directory
535- ``ENOTEMPTY``: the file is unencrypted and is a nonempty directory
536- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption
537- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
538  support for filesystems, or the filesystem superblock has not
539  had encryption enabled on it.  (For example, to use encryption on an
540  ext4 filesystem, CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION must be enabled in the
541  kernel config, and the superblock must have had the "encrypt"
542  feature flag enabled using ``tune2fs -O encrypt`` or ``mkfs.ext4 -O
543  encrypt``.)
544- ``EPERM``: this directory may not be encrypted, e.g. because it is
545  the root directory of an ext4 filesystem
546- ``EROFS``: the filesystem is readonly
547
548Getting an encryption policy
549----------------------------
550
551Two ioctls are available to get a file's encryption policy:
552
553- `FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX`_
554- `FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY`_
555
556The extended (_EX) version of the ioctl is more general and is
557recommended to use when possible.  However, on older kernels only the
558original ioctl is available.  Applications should try the extended
559version, and if it fails with ENOTTY fall back to the original
560version.
561
562FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX
563~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
564
565The FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX ioctl retrieves the encryption
566policy, if any, for a directory or regular file.  No additional
567permissions are required beyond the ability to open the file.  It
568takes in a pointer to a :c:type:`struct fscrypt_get_policy_ex_arg`,
569defined as follows::
570
571    struct fscrypt_get_policy_ex_arg {
572            __u64 policy_size; /* input/output */
573            union {
574                    __u8 version;
575                    struct fscrypt_policy_v1 v1;
576                    struct fscrypt_policy_v2 v2;
577            } policy; /* output */
578    };
579
580The caller must initialize ``policy_size`` to the size available for
581the policy struct, i.e. ``sizeof(arg.policy)``.
582
583On success, the policy struct is returned in ``policy``, and its
584actual size is returned in ``policy_size``.  ``policy.version`` should
585be checked to determine the version of policy returned.  Note that the
586version code for the "v1" policy is actually 0 (FSCRYPT_POLICY_V1).
587
588FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX can fail with the following errors:
589
590- ``EINVAL``: the file is encrypted, but it uses an unrecognized
591  encryption policy version
592- ``ENODATA``: the file is not encrypted
593- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption,
594  or this kernel is too old to support FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX
595  (try FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY instead)
596- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
597  support for this filesystem, or the filesystem superblock has not
598  had encryption enabled on it
599- ``EOVERFLOW``: the file is encrypted and uses a recognized
600  encryption policy version, but the policy struct does not fit into
601  the provided buffer
602
603Note: if you only need to know whether a file is encrypted or not, on
604most filesystems it is also possible to use the FS_IOC_GETFLAGS ioctl
605and check for FS_ENCRYPT_FL, or to use the statx() system call and
606check for STATX_ATTR_ENCRYPTED in stx_attributes.
607
608FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY
609~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
610
611The FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl can also retrieve the
612encryption policy, if any, for a directory or regular file.  However,
613unlike `FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX`_,
614FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY only supports the original policy
615version.  It takes in a pointer directly to a :c:type:`struct
616fscrypt_policy_v1` rather than a :c:type:`struct
617fscrypt_get_policy_ex_arg`.
618
619The error codes for FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY are the same as those
620for FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX, except that
621FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY also returns ``EINVAL`` if the file is
622encrypted using a newer encryption policy version.
623
624Getting the per-filesystem salt
625-------------------------------
626
627Some filesystems, such as ext4 and F2FS, also support the deprecated
628ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_PWSALT.  This ioctl retrieves a randomly
629generated 16-byte value stored in the filesystem superblock.  This
630value is intended to used as a salt when deriving an encryption key
631from a passphrase or other low-entropy user credential.
632
633FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_PWSALT is deprecated.  Instead, prefer to
634generate and manage any needed salt(s) in userspace.
635
636Adding keys
637-----------
638
639FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY
640~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
641
642The FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl adds a master encryption key to
643the filesystem, making all files on the filesystem which were
644encrypted using that key appear "unlocked", i.e. in plaintext form.
645It can be executed on any file or directory on the target filesystem,
646but using the filesystem's root directory is recommended.  It takes in
647a pointer to a :c:type:`struct fscrypt_add_key_arg`, defined as
648follows::
649
650    struct fscrypt_add_key_arg {
651            struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec;
652            __u32 raw_size;
653            __u32 key_id;
654            __u32 __reserved[8];
655            __u8 raw[];
656    };
657
658    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR        1
659    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER        2
660
661    struct fscrypt_key_specifier {
662            __u32 type;     /* one of FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_* */
663            __u32 __reserved;
664            union {
665                    __u8 __reserved[32]; /* reserve some extra space */
666                    __u8 descriptor[FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE];
667                    __u8 identifier[FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE];
668            } u;
669    };
670
671    struct fscrypt_provisioning_key_payload {
672            __u32 type;
673            __u32 __reserved;
674            __u8 raw[];
675    };
676
677:c:type:`struct fscrypt_add_key_arg` must be zeroed, then initialized
678as follows:
679
680- If the key is being added for use by v1 encryption policies, then
681  ``key_spec.type`` must contain FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR, and
682  ``key_spec.u.descriptor`` must contain the descriptor of the key
683  being added, corresponding to the value in the
684  ``master_key_descriptor`` field of :c:type:`struct
685  fscrypt_policy_v1`.  To add this type of key, the calling process
686  must have the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in the initial user
687  namespace.
688
689  Alternatively, if the key is being added for use by v2 encryption
690  policies, then ``key_spec.type`` must contain
691  FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER, and ``key_spec.u.identifier`` is
692  an *output* field which the kernel fills in with a cryptographic
693  hash of the key.  To add this type of key, the calling process does
694  not need any privileges.  However, the number of keys that can be
695  added is limited by the user's quota for the keyrings service (see
696  ``Documentation/security/keys/core.rst``).
697
698- ``raw_size`` must be the size of the ``raw`` key provided, in bytes.
699  Alternatively, if ``key_id`` is nonzero, this field must be 0, since
700  in that case the size is implied by the specified Linux keyring key.
701
702- ``key_id`` is 0 if the raw key is given directly in the ``raw``
703  field.  Otherwise ``key_id`` is the ID of a Linux keyring key of
704  type "fscrypt-provisioning" whose payload is a :c:type:`struct
705  fscrypt_provisioning_key_payload` whose ``raw`` field contains the
706  raw key and whose ``type`` field matches ``key_spec.type``.  Since
707  ``raw`` is variable-length, the total size of this key's payload
708  must be ``sizeof(struct fscrypt_provisioning_key_payload)`` plus the
709  raw key size.  The process must have Search permission on this key.
710
711  Most users should leave this 0 and specify the raw key directly.
712  The support for specifying a Linux keyring key is intended mainly to
713  allow re-adding keys after a filesystem is unmounted and re-mounted,
714  without having to store the raw keys in userspace memory.
715
716- ``raw`` is a variable-length field which must contain the actual
717  key, ``raw_size`` bytes long.  Alternatively, if ``key_id`` is
718  nonzero, then this field is unused.
719
720For v2 policy keys, the kernel keeps track of which user (identified
721by effective user ID) added the key, and only allows the key to be
722removed by that user --- or by "root", if they use
723`FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS`_.
724
725However, if another user has added the key, it may be desirable to
726prevent that other user from unexpectedly removing it.  Therefore,
727FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY may also be used to add a v2 policy key
728*again*, even if it's already added by other user(s).  In this case,
729FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY will just install a claim to the key for the
730current user, rather than actually add the key again (but the raw key
731must still be provided, as a proof of knowledge).
732
733FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY returns 0 if either the key or a claim to
734the key was either added or already exists.
735
736FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY can fail with the following errors:
737
738- ``EACCES``: FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR was specified, but the
739  caller does not have the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in the initial
740  user namespace; or the raw key was specified by Linux key ID but the
741  process lacks Search permission on the key.
742- ``EDQUOT``: the key quota for this user would be exceeded by adding
743  the key
744- ``EINVAL``: invalid key size or key specifier type, or reserved bits
745  were set
746- ``EKEYREJECTED``: the raw key was specified by Linux key ID, but the
747  key has the wrong type
748- ``ENOKEY``: the raw key was specified by Linux key ID, but no key
749  exists with that ID
750- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption
751- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
752  support for this filesystem, or the filesystem superblock has not
753  had encryption enabled on it
754
755Legacy method
756~~~~~~~~~~~~~
757
758For v1 encryption policies, a master encryption key can also be
759provided by adding it to a process-subscribed keyring, e.g. to a
760session keyring, or to a user keyring if the user keyring is linked
761into the session keyring.
762
763This method is deprecated (and not supported for v2 encryption
764policies) for several reasons.  First, it cannot be used in
765combination with FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY (see `Removing keys`_),
766so for removing a key a workaround such as keyctl_unlink() in
767combination with ``sync; echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches`` would
768have to be used.  Second, it doesn't match the fact that the
769locked/unlocked status of encrypted files (i.e. whether they appear to
770be in plaintext form or in ciphertext form) is global.  This mismatch
771has caused much confusion as well as real problems when processes
772running under different UIDs, such as a ``sudo`` command, need to
773access encrypted files.
774
775Nevertheless, to add a key to one of the process-subscribed keyrings,
776the add_key() system call can be used (see:
777``Documentation/security/keys/core.rst``).  The key type must be
778"logon"; keys of this type are kept in kernel memory and cannot be
779read back by userspace.  The key description must be "fscrypt:"
780followed by the 16-character lower case hex representation of the
781``master_key_descriptor`` that was set in the encryption policy.  The
782key payload must conform to the following structure::
783
784    #define FSCRYPT_MAX_KEY_SIZE            64
785
786    struct fscrypt_key {
787            __u32 mode;
788            __u8 raw[FSCRYPT_MAX_KEY_SIZE];
789            __u32 size;
790    };
791
792``mode`` is ignored; just set it to 0.  The actual key is provided in
793``raw`` with ``size`` indicating its size in bytes.  That is, the
794bytes ``raw[0..size-1]`` (inclusive) are the actual key.
795
796The key description prefix "fscrypt:" may alternatively be replaced
797with a filesystem-specific prefix such as "ext4:".  However, the
798filesystem-specific prefixes are deprecated and should not be used in
799new programs.
800
801Removing keys
802-------------
803
804Two ioctls are available for removing a key that was added by
805`FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_:
806
807- `FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_
808- `FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS`_
809
810These two ioctls differ only in cases where v2 policy keys are added
811or removed by non-root users.
812
813These ioctls don't work on keys that were added via the legacy
814process-subscribed keyrings mechanism.
815
816Before using these ioctls, read the `Kernel memory compromise`_
817section for a discussion of the security goals and limitations of
818these ioctls.
819
820FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY
821~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
822
823The FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl removes a claim to a master
824encryption key from the filesystem, and possibly removes the key
825itself.  It can be executed on any file or directory on the target
826filesystem, but using the filesystem's root directory is recommended.
827It takes in a pointer to a :c:type:`struct fscrypt_remove_key_arg`,
828defined as follows::
829
830    struct fscrypt_remove_key_arg {
831            struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec;
832    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_FILES_BUSY      0x00000001
833    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_OTHER_USERS     0x00000002
834            __u32 removal_status_flags;     /* output */
835            __u32 __reserved[5];
836    };
837
838This structure must be zeroed, then initialized as follows:
839
840- The key to remove is specified by ``key_spec``:
841
842    - To remove a key used by v1 encryption policies, set
843      ``key_spec.type`` to FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR and fill
844      in ``key_spec.u.descriptor``.  To remove this type of key, the
845      calling process must have the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in the
846      initial user namespace.
847
848    - To remove a key used by v2 encryption policies, set
849      ``key_spec.type`` to FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER and fill
850      in ``key_spec.u.identifier``.
851
852For v2 policy keys, this ioctl is usable by non-root users.  However,
853to make this possible, it actually just removes the current user's
854claim to the key, undoing a single call to FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY.
855Only after all claims are removed is the key really removed.
856
857For example, if FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY was called with uid 1000,
858then the key will be "claimed" by uid 1000, and
859FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY will only succeed as uid 1000.  Or, if
860both uids 1000 and 2000 added the key, then for each uid
861FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY will only remove their own claim.  Only
862once *both* are removed is the key really removed.  (Think of it like
863unlinking a file that may have hard links.)
864
865If FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY really removes the key, it will also
866try to "lock" all files that had been unlocked with the key.  It won't
867lock files that are still in-use, so this ioctl is expected to be used
868in cooperation with userspace ensuring that none of the files are
869still open.  However, if necessary, this ioctl can be executed again
870later to retry locking any remaining files.
871
872FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY returns 0 if either the key was removed
873(but may still have files remaining to be locked), the user's claim to
874the key was removed, or the key was already removed but had files
875remaining to be the locked so the ioctl retried locking them.  In any
876of these cases, ``removal_status_flags`` is filled in with the
877following informational status flags:
878
879- ``FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_FILES_BUSY``: set if some file(s)
880  are still in-use.  Not guaranteed to be set in the case where only
881  the user's claim to the key was removed.
882- ``FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_OTHER_USERS``: set if only the
883  user's claim to the key was removed, not the key itself
884
885FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY can fail with the following errors:
886
887- ``EACCES``: The FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR key specifier type
888  was specified, but the caller does not have the CAP_SYS_ADMIN
889  capability in the initial user namespace
890- ``EINVAL``: invalid key specifier type, or reserved bits were set
891- ``ENOKEY``: the key object was not found at all, i.e. it was never
892  added in the first place or was already fully removed including all
893  files locked; or, the user does not have a claim to the key (but
894  someone else does).
895- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption
896- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
897  support for this filesystem, or the filesystem superblock has not
898  had encryption enabled on it
899
900FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS
901~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
902
903FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS is exactly the same as
904`FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_, except that for v2 policy keys, the
905ALL_USERS version of the ioctl will remove all users' claims to the
906key, not just the current user's.  I.e., the key itself will always be
907removed, no matter how many users have added it.  This difference is
908only meaningful if non-root users are adding and removing keys.
909
910Because of this, FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS also requires
911"root", namely the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in the initial user
912namespace.  Otherwise it will fail with EACCES.
913
914Getting key status
915------------------
916
917FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS
918~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
919
920The FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS ioctl retrieves the status of a
921master encryption key.  It can be executed on any file or directory on
922the target filesystem, but using the filesystem's root directory is
923recommended.  It takes in a pointer to a :c:type:`struct
924fscrypt_get_key_status_arg`, defined as follows::
925
926    struct fscrypt_get_key_status_arg {
927            /* input */
928            struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec;
929            __u32 __reserved[6];
930
931            /* output */
932    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_ABSENT               1
933    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_PRESENT              2
934    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_INCOMPLETELY_REMOVED 3
935            __u32 status;
936    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_FLAG_ADDED_BY_SELF   0x00000001
937            __u32 status_flags;
938            __u32 user_count;
939            __u32 __out_reserved[13];
940    };
941
942The caller must zero all input fields, then fill in ``key_spec``:
943
944    - To get the status of a key for v1 encryption policies, set
945      ``key_spec.type`` to FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR and fill
946      in ``key_spec.u.descriptor``.
947
948    - To get the status of a key for v2 encryption policies, set
949      ``key_spec.type`` to FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER and fill
950      in ``key_spec.u.identifier``.
951
952On success, 0 is returned and the kernel fills in the output fields:
953
954- ``status`` indicates whether the key is absent, present, or
955  incompletely removed.  Incompletely removed means that the master
956  secret has been removed, but some files are still in use; i.e.,
957  `FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_ returned 0 but set the informational
958  status flag FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_FILES_BUSY.
959
960- ``status_flags`` can contain the following flags:
961
962    - ``FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_FLAG_ADDED_BY_SELF`` indicates that the key
963      has added by the current user.  This is only set for keys
964      identified by ``identifier`` rather than by ``descriptor``.
965
966- ``user_count`` specifies the number of users who have added the key.
967  This is only set for keys identified by ``identifier`` rather than
968  by ``descriptor``.
969
970FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS can fail with the following errors:
971
972- ``EINVAL``: invalid key specifier type, or reserved bits were set
973- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption
974- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
975  support for this filesystem, or the filesystem superblock has not
976  had encryption enabled on it
977
978Among other use cases, FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS can be useful
979for determining whether the key for a given encrypted directory needs
980to be added before prompting the user for the passphrase needed to
981derive the key.
982
983FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS can only get the status of keys in
984the filesystem-level keyring, i.e. the keyring managed by
985`FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_ and `FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_.  It
986cannot get the status of a key that has only been added for use by v1
987encryption policies using the legacy mechanism involving
988process-subscribed keyrings.
989
990Access semantics
991================
992
993With the key
994------------
995
996With the encryption key, encrypted regular files, directories, and
997symlinks behave very similarly to their unencrypted counterparts ---
998after all, the encryption is intended to be transparent.  However,
999astute users may notice some differences in behavior:
1000
1001- Unencrypted files, or files encrypted with a different encryption
1002  policy (i.e. different key, modes, or flags), cannot be renamed or
1003  linked into an encrypted directory; see `Encryption policy
1004  enforcement`_.  Attempts to do so will fail with EXDEV.  However,
1005  encrypted files can be renamed within an encrypted directory, or
1006  into an unencrypted directory.
1007
1008  Note: "moving" an unencrypted file into an encrypted directory, e.g.
1009  with the `mv` program, is implemented in userspace by a copy
1010  followed by a delete.  Be aware that the original unencrypted data
1011  may remain recoverable from free space on the disk; prefer to keep
1012  all files encrypted from the very beginning.  The `shred` program
1013  may be used to overwrite the source files but isn't guaranteed to be
1014  effective on all filesystems and storage devices.
1015
1016- Direct I/O is not supported on encrypted files.  Attempts to use
1017  direct I/O on such files will fall back to buffered I/O.
1018
1019- The fallocate operations FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE and
1020  FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE are not supported on encrypted files and will
1021  fail with EOPNOTSUPP.
1022
1023- Online defragmentation of encrypted files is not supported.  The
1024  EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT and F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE ioctls will fail with
1025  EOPNOTSUPP.
1026
1027- The ext4 filesystem does not support data journaling with encrypted
1028  regular files.  It will fall back to ordered data mode instead.
1029
1030- DAX (Direct Access) is not supported on encrypted files.
1031
1032- The st_size of an encrypted symlink will not necessarily give the
1033  length of the symlink target as required by POSIX.  It will actually
1034  give the length of the ciphertext, which will be slightly longer
1035  than the plaintext due to NUL-padding and an extra 2-byte overhead.
1036
1037- The maximum length of an encrypted symlink is 2 bytes shorter than
1038  the maximum length of an unencrypted symlink.  For example, on an
1039  EXT4 filesystem with a 4K block size, unencrypted symlinks can be up
1040  to 4095 bytes long, while encrypted symlinks can only be up to 4093
1041  bytes long (both lengths excluding the terminating null).
1042
1043Note that mmap *is* supported.  This is possible because the pagecache
1044for an encrypted file contains the plaintext, not the ciphertext.
1045
1046Without the key
1047---------------
1048
1049Some filesystem operations may be performed on encrypted regular
1050files, directories, and symlinks even before their encryption key has
1051been added, or after their encryption key has been removed:
1052
1053- File metadata may be read, e.g. using stat().
1054
1055- Directories may be listed, in which case the filenames will be
1056  listed in an encoded form derived from their ciphertext.  The
1057  current encoding algorithm is described in `Filename hashing and
1058  encoding`_.  The algorithm is subject to change, but it is
1059  guaranteed that the presented filenames will be no longer than
1060  NAME_MAX bytes, will not contain the ``/`` or ``\0`` characters, and
1061  will uniquely identify directory entries.
1062
1063  The ``.`` and ``..`` directory entries are special.  They are always
1064  present and are not encrypted or encoded.
1065
1066- Files may be deleted.  That is, nondirectory files may be deleted
1067  with unlink() as usual, and empty directories may be deleted with
1068  rmdir() as usual.  Therefore, ``rm`` and ``rm -r`` will work as
1069  expected.
1070
1071- Symlink targets may be read and followed, but they will be presented
1072  in encrypted form, similar to filenames in directories.  Hence, they
1073  are unlikely to point to anywhere useful.
1074
1075Without the key, regular files cannot be opened or truncated.
1076Attempts to do so will fail with ENOKEY.  This implies that any
1077regular file operations that require a file descriptor, such as
1078read(), write(), mmap(), fallocate(), and ioctl(), are also forbidden.
1079
1080Also without the key, files of any type (including directories) cannot
1081be created or linked into an encrypted directory, nor can a name in an
1082encrypted directory be the source or target of a rename, nor can an
1083O_TMPFILE temporary file be created in an encrypted directory.  All
1084such operations will fail with ENOKEY.
1085
1086It is not currently possible to backup and restore encrypted files
1087without the encryption key.  This would require special APIs which
1088have not yet been implemented.
1089
1090Encryption policy enforcement
1091=============================
1092
1093After an encryption policy has been set on a directory, all regular
1094files, directories, and symbolic links created in that directory
1095(recursively) will inherit that encryption policy.  Special files ---
1096that is, named pipes, device nodes, and UNIX domain sockets --- will
1097not be encrypted.
1098
1099Except for those special files, it is forbidden to have unencrypted
1100files, or files encrypted with a different encryption policy, in an
1101encrypted directory tree.  Attempts to link or rename such a file into
1102an encrypted directory will fail with EXDEV.  This is also enforced
1103during ->lookup() to provide limited protection against offline
1104attacks that try to disable or downgrade encryption in known locations
1105where applications may later write sensitive data.  It is recommended
1106that systems implementing a form of "verified boot" take advantage of
1107this by validating all top-level encryption policies prior to access.
1108
1109Implementation details
1110======================
1111
1112Encryption context
1113------------------
1114
1115An encryption policy is represented on-disk by a :c:type:`struct
1116fscrypt_context_v1` or a :c:type:`struct fscrypt_context_v2`.  It is
1117up to individual filesystems to decide where to store it, but normally
1118it would be stored in a hidden extended attribute.  It should *not* be
1119exposed by the xattr-related system calls such as getxattr() and
1120setxattr() because of the special semantics of the encryption xattr.
1121(In particular, there would be much confusion if an encryption policy
1122were to be added to or removed from anything other than an empty
1123directory.)  These structs are defined as follows::
1124
1125    #define FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE 16
1126
1127    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE  8
1128    struct fscrypt_context_v1 {
1129            u8 version;
1130            u8 contents_encryption_mode;
1131            u8 filenames_encryption_mode;
1132            u8 flags;
1133            u8 master_key_descriptor[FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE];
1134            u8 nonce[FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE];
1135    };
1136
1137    #define FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE  16
1138    struct fscrypt_context_v2 {
1139            u8 version;
1140            u8 contents_encryption_mode;
1141            u8 filenames_encryption_mode;
1142            u8 flags;
1143            u8 __reserved[4];
1144            u8 master_key_identifier[FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE];
1145            u8 nonce[FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE];
1146    };
1147
1148The context structs contain the same information as the corresponding
1149policy structs (see `Setting an encryption policy`_), except that the
1150context structs also contain a nonce.  The nonce is randomly generated
1151by the kernel and is used as KDF input or as a tweak to cause
1152different files to be encrypted differently; see `Per-file encryption
1153keys`_ and `DIRECT_KEY policies`_.
1154
1155Data path changes
1156-----------------
1157
1158For the read path (->readpage()) of regular files, filesystems can
1159read the ciphertext into the page cache and decrypt it in-place.  The
1160page lock must be held until decryption has finished, to prevent the
1161page from becoming visible to userspace prematurely.
1162
1163For the write path (->writepage()) of regular files, filesystems
1164cannot encrypt data in-place in the page cache, since the cached
1165plaintext must be preserved.  Instead, filesystems must encrypt into a
1166temporary buffer or "bounce page", then write out the temporary
1167buffer.  Some filesystems, such as UBIFS, already use temporary
1168buffers regardless of encryption.  Other filesystems, such as ext4 and
1169F2FS, have to allocate bounce pages specially for encryption.
1170
1171Filename hashing and encoding
1172-----------------------------
1173
1174Modern filesystems accelerate directory lookups by using indexed
1175directories.  An indexed directory is organized as a tree keyed by
1176filename hashes.  When a ->lookup() is requested, the filesystem
1177normally hashes the filename being looked up so that it can quickly
1178find the corresponding directory entry, if any.
1179
1180With encryption, lookups must be supported and efficient both with and
1181without the encryption key.  Clearly, it would not work to hash the
1182plaintext filenames, since the plaintext filenames are unavailable
1183without the key.  (Hashing the plaintext filenames would also make it
1184impossible for the filesystem's fsck tool to optimize encrypted
1185directories.)  Instead, filesystems hash the ciphertext filenames,
1186i.e. the bytes actually stored on-disk in the directory entries.  When
1187asked to do a ->lookup() with the key, the filesystem just encrypts
1188the user-supplied name to get the ciphertext.
1189
1190Lookups without the key are more complicated.  The raw ciphertext may
1191contain the ``\0`` and ``/`` characters, which are illegal in
1192filenames.  Therefore, readdir() must base64-encode the ciphertext for
1193presentation.  For most filenames, this works fine; on ->lookup(), the
1194filesystem just base64-decodes the user-supplied name to get back to
1195the raw ciphertext.
1196
1197However, for very long filenames, base64 encoding would cause the
1198filename length to exceed NAME_MAX.  To prevent this, readdir()
1199actually presents long filenames in an abbreviated form which encodes
1200a strong "hash" of the ciphertext filename, along with the optional
1201filesystem-specific hash(es) needed for directory lookups.  This
1202allows the filesystem to still, with a high degree of confidence, map
1203the filename given in ->lookup() back to a particular directory entry
1204that was previously listed by readdir().  See :c:type:`struct
1205fscrypt_nokey_name` in the source for more details.
1206
1207Note that the precise way that filenames are presented to userspace
1208without the key is subject to change in the future.  It is only meant
1209as a way to temporarily present valid filenames so that commands like
1210``rm -r`` work as expected on encrypted directories.
1211
1212Tests
1213=====
1214
1215To test fscrypt, use xfstests, which is Linux's de facto standard
1216filesystem test suite.  First, run all the tests in the "encrypt"
1217group on the relevant filesystem(s).  For example, to test ext4 and
1218f2fs encryption using `kvm-xfstests
1219<https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/kvm-quickstart.md>`_::
1220
1221    kvm-xfstests -c ext4,f2fs -g encrypt
1222
1223UBIFS encryption can also be tested this way, but it should be done in
1224a separate command, and it takes some time for kvm-xfstests to set up
1225emulated UBI volumes::
1226
1227    kvm-xfstests -c ubifs -g encrypt
1228
1229No tests should fail.  However, tests that use non-default encryption
1230modes (e.g. generic/549 and generic/550) will be skipped if the needed
1231algorithms were not built into the kernel's crypto API.  Also, tests
1232that access the raw block device (e.g. generic/399, generic/548,
1233generic/549, generic/550) will be skipped on UBIFS.
1234
1235Besides running the "encrypt" group tests, for ext4 and f2fs it's also
1236possible to run most xfstests with the "test_dummy_encryption" mount
1237option.  This option causes all new files to be automatically
1238encrypted with a dummy key, without having to make any API calls.
1239This tests the encrypted I/O paths more thoroughly.  To do this with
1240kvm-xfstests, use the "encrypt" filesystem configuration::
1241
1242    kvm-xfstests -c ext4/encrypt,f2fs/encrypt -g auto
1243
1244Because this runs many more tests than "-g encrypt" does, it takes
1245much longer to run; so also consider using `gce-xfstests
1246<https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/gce-xfstests.md>`_
1247instead of kvm-xfstests::
1248
1249    gce-xfstests -c ext4/encrypt,f2fs/encrypt -g auto
1250