1=========================== 2Power Management Strategies 3=========================== 4 5:: 6 7 Copyright (c) 2017 Intel Corp., Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 8 9The Linux kernel supports two major high-level power management strategies. 10 11One of them is based on using global low-power states of the whole system in 12which user space code cannot be executed and the overall system activity is 13significantly reduced, referred to as :doc:`sleep states <sleep-states>`. The 14kernel puts the system into one of these states when requested by user space 15and the system stays in it until a special signal is received from one of 16designated devices, triggering a transition to the ``working state`` in which 17user space code can run. Because sleep states are global and the whole system 18is affected by the state changes, this strategy is referred to as the 19:doc:`system-wide power management <system-wide>`. 20 21The other strategy, referred to as the :doc:`working-state power management 22<working-state>`, is based on adjusting the power states of individual hardware 23components of the system, as needed, in the working state. In consequence, if 24this strategy is in use, the working state of the system usually does not 25correspond to any particular physical configuration of it, but can be treated as 26a metastate covering a range of different power states of the system in which 27the individual components of it can be either ``active`` (in use) or 28``inactive`` (idle). If they are active, they have to be in power states 29allowing them to process data and to be accessed by software. In turn, if they 30are inactive, ideally, they should be in low-power states in which they may not 31be accessible. 32 33If all of the system components are active, the system as a whole is regarded as 34"runtime active" and that situation typically corresponds to the maximum power 35draw (or maximum energy usage) of it. If all of them are inactive, the system 36as a whole is regarded as "runtime idle" which may be very close to a sleep 37state from the physical system configuration and power draw perspective, but 38then it takes much less time and effort to start executing user space code than 39for the same system in a sleep state. However, transitions from sleep states 40back to the working state can only be started by a limited set of devices, so 41typically the system can spend much more time in a sleep state than it can be 42runtime idle in one go. For this reason, systems usually use less energy in 43sleep states than when they are runtime idle most of the time. 44 45Moreover, the two power management strategies address different usage scenarios. 46Namely, if the user indicates that the system will not be in use going forward, 47for example by closing its lid (if the system is a laptop), it probably should 48go into a sleep state at that point. On the other hand, if the user simply goes 49away from the laptop keyboard, it probably should stay in the working state and 50use the working-state power management in case it becomes idle, because the user 51may come back to it at any time and then may want the system to be immediately 52accessible. 53