xref: /openbmc/linux/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat (revision 1ac731c529cd4d6adbce134754b51ff7d822b145)

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
(*
 * Copyright (C) 2015 Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
 * Copyright (C) 2016 Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr> for Inria
 * Copyright (C) 2017 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
 *                    Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
 *
 * An earlier version of this file appeared in the companion webpage for
 * "Frightening small children and disconcerting grown-ups: Concurrency
 * in the Linux kernel" by Alglave, Maranget, McKenney, Parri, and Stern,
 * which appeared in ASPLOS 2018.
 *)

"Linux-kernel memory consistency model"

(*
 * File "lock.cat" handles locks and is experimental.
 * It can be replaced by include "cos.cat" for tests that do not use locks.
 *)

include "lock.cat"

(*******************)
(* Basic relations *)
(*******************)

(* Release Acquire *)
let acq-po = [Acquire] ; po ; [M]
let po-rel = [M] ; po ; [Release]
let po-unlock-lock-po = po ; [UL] ; (po|rf) ; [LKR] ; po

(* Fences *)
let R4rmb = R \ Noreturn	(* Reads for which rmb works *)
let rmb = [R4rmb] ; fencerel(Rmb) ; [R4rmb]
let wmb = [W] ; fencerel(Wmb) ; [W]
let mb = ([M] ; fencerel(Mb) ; [M]) |
	([M] ; fencerel(Before-atomic) ; [RMW] ; po? ; [M]) |
	([M] ; po? ; [RMW] ; fencerel(After-atomic) ; [M]) |
	([M] ; po? ; [LKW] ; fencerel(After-spinlock) ; [M]) |
(*
 * Note: The po-unlock-lock-po relation only passes the lock to the direct
 * successor, perhaps giving the impression that the ordering of the
 * smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() fence only affects a single lock handover.
 * However, in a longer sequence of lock handovers, the implicit
 * A-cumulative release fences of lock-release ensure that any stores that
 * propagate to one of the involved CPUs before it hands over the lock to
 * the next CPU will also propagate to the final CPU handing over the lock
 * to the CPU that executes the fence.  Therefore, all those stores are
 * also affected by the fence.
 *)
	([M] ; po-unlock-lock-po ;
		[After-unlock-lock] ; po ; [M]) |
	([M] ; po? ; [Srcu-unlock] ; fencerel(After-srcu-read-unlock) ; [M])
let gp = po ; [Sync-rcu | Sync-srcu] ; po?
let strong-fence = mb | gp

let nonrw-fence = strong-fence | po-rel | acq-po
let fence = nonrw-fence | wmb | rmb
let barrier = fencerel(Barrier | Rmb | Wmb | Mb | Sync-rcu | Sync-srcu |
		Before-atomic | After-atomic | Acquire | Release |
		Rcu-lock | Rcu-unlock | Srcu-lock | Srcu-unlock) |
	(po ; [Release]) | ([Acquire] ; po)

(**********************************)
(* Fundamental coherence ordering *)
(**********************************)

(* Sequential Consistency Per Variable *)
let com = rf | co | fr
acyclic po-loc | com as coherence

(* Atomic Read-Modify-Write *)
empty rmw & (fre ; coe) as atomic

(**********************************)
(* Instruction execution ordering *)
(**********************************)

(* Preserved Program Order *)
let dep = addr | data
let rwdep = (dep | ctrl) ; [W]
let overwrite = co | fr
let to-w = rwdep | (overwrite & int) | (addr ; [Plain] ; wmb)
let to-r = (addr ; [R]) | (dep ; [Marked] ; rfi)
let ppo = to-r | to-w | (fence & int) | (po-unlock-lock-po & int)

(* Propagation: Ordering from release operations and strong fences. *)
let A-cumul(r) = (rfe ; [Marked])? ; r
let rmw-sequence = (rf ; rmw)*
let cumul-fence = [Marked] ; (A-cumul(strong-fence | po-rel) | wmb |
	po-unlock-lock-po) ; [Marked] ; rmw-sequence
let prop = [Marked] ; (overwrite & ext)? ; cumul-fence* ;
	[Marked] ; rfe? ; [Marked]

(*
 * Happens Before: Ordering from the passage of time.
 * No fences needed here for prop because relation confined to one process.
 *)
let hb = [Marked] ; (ppo | rfe | ((prop \ id) & int)) ; [Marked]
acyclic hb as happens-before

(****************************************)
(* Write and fence propagation ordering *)
(****************************************)

(* Propagation: Each non-rf link needs a strong fence. *)
let pb = prop ; strong-fence ; hb* ; [Marked]
acyclic pb as propagation

(*******)
(* RCU *)
(*******)

(*
 * Effects of read-side critical sections proceed from the rcu_read_unlock()
 * or srcu_read_unlock() backwards on the one hand, and from the
 * rcu_read_lock() or srcu_read_lock() forwards on the other hand.
 *
 * In the definition of rcu-fence below, the po term at the left-hand side
 * of each disjunct and the po? term at the right-hand end have been factored
 * out.  They have been moved into the definitions of rcu-link and rb.
 * This was necessary in order to apply the "& loc" tests correctly.
 *)
let rcu-gp = [Sync-rcu]		(* Compare with gp *)
let srcu-gp = [Sync-srcu]
let rcu-rscsi = rcu-rscs^-1
let srcu-rscsi = srcu-rscs^-1

(*
 * The synchronize_rcu() strong fence is special in that it can order not
 * one but two non-rf relations, but only in conjunction with an RCU
 * read-side critical section.
 *)
let rcu-link = po? ; hb* ; pb* ; prop ; po

(*
 * Any sequence containing at least as many grace periods as RCU read-side
 * critical sections (joined by rcu-link) induces order like a generalized
 * inter-CPU strong fence.
 * Likewise for SRCU grace periods and read-side critical sections, provided
 * the synchronize_srcu() and srcu_read_[un]lock() calls refer to the same
 * struct srcu_struct location.
 *)
let rec rcu-order = rcu-gp | srcu-gp |
	(rcu-gp ; rcu-link ; rcu-rscsi) |
	((srcu-gp ; rcu-link ; srcu-rscsi) & loc) |
	(rcu-rscsi ; rcu-link ; rcu-gp) |
	((srcu-rscsi ; rcu-link ; srcu-gp) & loc) |
	(rcu-gp ; rcu-link ; rcu-order ; rcu-link ; rcu-rscsi) |
	((srcu-gp ; rcu-link ; rcu-order ; rcu-link ; srcu-rscsi) & loc) |
	(rcu-rscsi ; rcu-link ; rcu-order ; rcu-link ; rcu-gp) |
	((srcu-rscsi ; rcu-link ; rcu-order ; rcu-link ; srcu-gp) & loc) |
	(rcu-order ; rcu-link ; rcu-order)
let rcu-fence = po ; rcu-order ; po?
let fence = fence | rcu-fence
let strong-fence = strong-fence | rcu-fence

(* rb orders instructions just as pb does *)
let rb = prop ; rcu-fence ; hb* ; pb* ; [Marked]

irreflexive rb as rcu

(*
 * The happens-before, propagation, and rcu constraints are all
 * expressions of temporal ordering.  They could be replaced by
 * a single constraint on an "executes-before" relation, xb:
 *
 * let xb = hb | pb | rb
 * acyclic xb as executes-before
 *)

(*********************************)
(* Plain accesses and data races *)
(*********************************)

(* Warn about plain writes and marked accesses in the same region *)
let mixed-accesses = ([Plain & W] ; (po-loc \ barrier) ; [Marked]) |
	([Marked] ; (po-loc \ barrier) ; [Plain & W])
flag ~empty mixed-accesses as mixed-accesses

(* Executes-before and visibility *)
let xbstar = (hb | pb | rb)*
let vis = cumul-fence* ; rfe? ; [Marked] ;
	((strong-fence ; [Marked] ; xbstar) | (xbstar & int))

(* Boundaries for lifetimes of plain accesses *)
let w-pre-bounded = [Marked] ; (addr | fence)?
let r-pre-bounded = [Marked] ; (addr | nonrw-fence |
	([R4rmb] ; fencerel(Rmb) ; [~Noreturn]))?
let w-post-bounded = fence? ; [Marked] ; rmw-sequence
let r-post-bounded = (nonrw-fence | ([~Noreturn] ; fencerel(Rmb) ; [R4rmb]))? ;
	[Marked]

(* Visibility and executes-before for plain accesses *)
let ww-vis = fence | (strong-fence ; xbstar ; w-pre-bounded) |
	(w-post-bounded ; vis ; w-pre-bounded)
let wr-vis = fence | (strong-fence ; xbstar ; r-pre-bounded) |
	(w-post-bounded ; vis ; r-pre-bounded)
let rw-xbstar = fence | (r-post-bounded ; xbstar ; w-pre-bounded)

(* Potential races *)
let pre-race = ext & ((Plain * M) | ((M \ IW) * Plain))

(* Coherence requirements for plain accesses *)
let wr-incoh = pre-race & rf & rw-xbstar^-1
let rw-incoh = pre-race & fr & wr-vis^-1
let ww-incoh = pre-race & co & ww-vis^-1
empty (wr-incoh | rw-incoh | ww-incoh) as plain-coherence

(* Actual races *)
let ww-nonrace = ww-vis & ((Marked * W) | rw-xbstar) & ((W * Marked) | wr-vis)
let ww-race = (pre-race & co) \ ww-nonrace
let wr-race = (pre-race & (co? ; rf)) \ wr-vis \ rw-xbstar^-1
let rw-race = (pre-race & fr) \ rw-xbstar

flag ~empty (ww-race | wr-race | rw-race) as data-race