xref: /openbmc/linux/Documentation/core-api/padata.rst (revision 9a87ffc99ec8eb8d35eed7c4f816d75f5cc9662e)

.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

=======================================
The padata parallel execution mechanism
=======================================

:Date: May 2020

Padata is a mechanism by which the kernel can farm jobs out to be done in
parallel on multiple CPUs while optionally retaining their ordering.

It was originally developed for IPsec, which needs to perform encryption and
decryption on large numbers of packets without reordering those packets.  This
is currently the sole consumer of padata's serialized job support.

Padata also supports multithreaded jobs, splitting up the job evenly while load
balancing and coordinating between threads.

Running Serialized Jobs
=======================

Initializing
------------

The first step in using padata to run serialized jobs is to set up a
padata_instance structure for overall control of how jobs are to be run::

    #include <linux/padata.h>

    struct padata_instance *padata_alloc(const char *name);

'name' simply identifies the instance.

Then, complete padata initialization by allocating a padata_shell::

   struct padata_shell *padata_alloc_shell(struct padata_instance *pinst);

A padata_shell is used to submit a job to padata and allows a series of such
jobs to be serialized independently.  A padata_instance may have one or more
padata_shells associated with it, each allowing a separate series of jobs.

Modifying cpumasks
------------------

The CPUs used to run jobs can be changed in two ways, programmatically with
padata_set_cpumask() or via sysfs.  The former is defined::

    int padata_set_cpumask(struct padata_instance *pinst, int cpumask_type,
			   cpumask_var_t cpumask);

Here cpumask_type is one of PADATA_CPU_PARALLEL or PADATA_CPU_SERIAL, where a
parallel cpumask describes which processors will be used to execute jobs
submitted to this instance in parallel and a serial cpumask defines which
processors are allowed to be used as the serialization callback processor.
cpumask specifies the new cpumask to use.

There may be sysfs files for an instance's cpumasks.  For example, pcrypt's
live in /sys/kernel/pcrypt/<instance-name>.  Within an instance's directory
there are two files, parallel_cpumask and serial_cpumask, and either cpumask
may be changed by echoing a bitmask into the file, for example::

    echo f > /sys/kernel/pcrypt/pencrypt/parallel_cpumask

Reading one of these files shows the user-supplied cpumask, which may be
different from the 'usable' cpumask.

Padata maintains two pairs of cpumasks internally, the user-supplied cpumasks
and the 'usable' cpumasks.  (Each pair consists of a parallel and a serial
cpumask.)  The user-supplied cpumasks default to all possible CPUs on instance
allocation and may be changed as above.  The usable cpumasks are always a
subset of the user-supplied cpumasks and contain only the online CPUs in the
user-supplied masks; these are the cpumasks padata actually uses.  So it is
legal to supply a cpumask to padata that contains offline CPUs.  Once an
offline CPU in the user-supplied cpumask comes online, padata is going to use
it.

Changing the CPU masks are expensive operations, so it should not be done with
great frequency.

Running A Job
-------------

Actually submitting work to the padata instance requires the creation of a
padata_priv structure, which represents one job::

    struct padata_priv {
        /* Other stuff here... */
	void                    (*parallel)(struct padata_priv *padata);
	void                    (*serial)(struct padata_priv *padata);
    };

This structure will almost certainly be embedded within some larger
structure specific to the work to be done.  Most of its fields are private to
padata, but the structure should be zeroed at initialisation time, and the
parallel() and serial() functions should be provided.  Those functions will
be called in the process of getting the work done as we will see
momentarily.

The submission of the job is done with::

    int padata_do_parallel(struct padata_shell *ps,
		           struct padata_priv *padata, int *cb_cpu);

The ps and padata structures must be set up as described above; cb_cpu
points to the preferred CPU to be used for the final callback when the job is
done; it must be in the current instance's CPU mask (if not the cb_cpu pointer
is updated to point to the CPU actually chosen).  The return value from
padata_do_parallel() is zero on success, indicating that the job is in
progress. -EBUSY means that somebody, somewhere else is messing with the
instance's CPU mask, while -EINVAL is a complaint about cb_cpu not being in the
serial cpumask, no online CPUs in the parallel or serial cpumasks, or a stopped
instance.

Each job submitted to padata_do_parallel() will, in turn, be passed to
exactly one call to the above-mentioned parallel() function, on one CPU, so
true parallelism is achieved by submitting multiple jobs.  parallel() runs with
software interrupts disabled and thus cannot sleep.  The parallel()
function gets the padata_priv structure pointer as its lone parameter;
information about the actual work to be done is probably obtained by using
container_of() to find the enclosing structure.

Note that parallel() has no return value; the padata subsystem assumes that
parallel() will take responsibility for the job from this point.  The job
need not be completed during this call, but, if parallel() leaves work
outstanding, it should be prepared to be called again with a new job before
the previous one completes.

Serializing Jobs
----------------

When a job does complete, parallel() (or whatever function actually finishes
the work) should inform padata of the fact with a call to::

    void padata_do_serial(struct padata_priv *padata);

At some point in the future, padata_do_serial() will trigger a call to the
serial() function in the padata_priv structure.  That call will happen on
the CPU requested in the initial call to padata_do_parallel(); it, too, is
run with local software interrupts disabled.
Note that this call may be deferred for a while since the padata code takes
pains to ensure that jobs are completed in the order in which they were
submitted.

Destroying
----------

Cleaning up a padata instance predictably involves calling the two free
functions that correspond to the allocation in reverse::

    void padata_free_shell(struct padata_shell *ps);
    void padata_free(struct padata_instance *pinst);

It is the user's responsibility to ensure all outstanding jobs are complete
before any of the above are called.

Running Multithreaded Jobs
==========================

A multithreaded job has a main thread and zero or more helper threads, with the
main thread participating in the job and then waiting until all helpers have
finished.  padata splits the job into units called chunks, where a chunk is a
piece of the job that one thread completes in one call to the thread function.

A user has to do three things to run a multithreaded job.  First, describe the
job by defining a padata_mt_job structure, which is explained in the Interface
section.  This includes a pointer to the thread function, which padata will
call each time it assigns a job chunk to a thread.  Then, define the thread
function, which accepts three arguments, ``start``, ``end``, and ``arg``, where
the first two delimit the range that the thread operates on and the last is a
pointer to the job's shared state, if any.  Prepare the shared state, which is
typically allocated on the main thread's stack.  Last, call
padata_do_multithreaded(), which will return once the job is finished.

Interface
=========

.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/padata.h
.. kernel-doc:: kernel/padata.c