/openbmc/linux/kernel/locking/ |
H A D | rwbase_rt.c | 61 for (r = atomic_read(&rwb->readers); r < 0;) { in rwbase_read_trylock() 62 if (likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&rwb->readers, &r, r + 1))) in rwbase_read_trylock() 122 atomic_inc(&rwb->readers); in __rwbase_read_lock() 173 if (unlikely(atomic_dec_and_test(&rwb->readers))) in rwbase_read_unlock() 186 (void)atomic_add_return_release(READER_BIAS - bias, &rwb->readers); in __rwbase_write_unlock() 219 if (!atomic_read_acquire(&rwb->readers)) { in __rwbase_write_trylock() 220 atomic_set(&rwb->readers, WRITER_BIAS); in __rwbase_write_trylock() 238 atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &rwb->readers); in rwbase_write_lock() 280 atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &rwb->readers); in rwbase_write_trylock()
|
/openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
H A D | rwbase_rt.h | 12 atomic_t readers; member 18 .readers = ATOMIC_INIT(READER_BIAS), \ 25 atomic_set(&(rwbase)->readers, READER_BIAS); \ 31 return atomic_read(&rwb->readers) != READER_BIAS; in rw_base_is_locked() 36 return atomic_read(&rwb->readers) > 0; in rw_base_is_contended()
|
H A D | rwlock_types.h | 59 atomic_t readers; member
|
/openbmc/openbmc/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/fbida/files/ |
H A D | fbida-gcc10.patch | 21 #include "readers.h" 29 --- fbida-2.14/readers.c.org 2020-03-15 17:01:18.692683597 +0100 30 +++ fbida-2.14/readers.c 2020-03-15 16:57:19.141632384 +0100 33 #include "readers.h"
|
/openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
H A D | locking.c | 331 atomic_set(&lock->readers, 0); in btrfs_drew_lock_init() 340 if (atomic_read(&lock->readers)) in btrfs_drew_try_write_lock() 347 if (atomic_read(&lock->readers)) { in btrfs_drew_try_write_lock() 360 wait_event(lock->pending_writers, !atomic_read(&lock->readers)); in btrfs_drew_write_lock() 372 atomic_inc(&lock->readers); in btrfs_drew_read_lock() 391 if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lock->readers)) in btrfs_drew_read_unlock()
|
H A D | subpage.c | 174 atomic_set(&ret->readers, 0); in btrfs_alloc_subpage() 249 atomic_add(nbits, &subpage->readers); in btrfs_subpage_start_reader() 262 ASSERT(atomic_read(&subpage->readers) >= nbits); in btrfs_subpage_end_reader() 263 last = atomic_sub_and_test(nbits, &subpage->readers); in btrfs_subpage_end_reader() 303 ASSERT(atomic_read(&subpage->readers) == 0); in btrfs_subpage_start_writer()
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/misc/cardreader/ |
H A D | Kconfig | 9 Alcor Micro card readers support access to many types of memory cards, 20 Realtek card readers support access to many types of memory cards, 29 Select this option to get support for Realtek USB 2.0 card readers
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/RCU/ |
H A D | rcu.rst | 10 must be long enough that any readers accessing the item being deleted have 21 The advantage of RCU's two-part approach is that RCU readers need 26 in read-mostly situations. The fact that RCU readers need not 30 if the RCU readers give no indication when they are done? 32 Just as with spinlocks, RCU readers are not permitted to 42 same effect, but require that the readers manipulate CPU-local
|
H A D | checklist.rst | 30 One final exception is where RCU readers are used to prevent 40 RCU does allow *readers* to run (almost) naked, but *writers* must 85 The whole point of RCU is to permit readers to run without 86 any locks or atomic operations. This means that readers will 99 locks (that are acquired by both readers and writers) 100 that guard per-element state. Fields that the readers 106 c. Make updates appear atomic to readers. For example, 110 appear to be atomic to RCU readers, nor will sequences 118 d. Carefully order the updates and the reads so that readers 161 is common to readers and updaters. However, lockdep [all …]
|
H A D | whatisRCU.rst | 56 Section 1, though most readers will profit by reading this section at 79 new versions of these data items), and can run concurrently with readers. 81 readers is the semantics of modern CPUs guarantee that readers will see 85 removal phase. Because reclaiming data items can disrupt any readers 87 not start until readers no longer hold references to those data items. 91 reclamation phase until all readers active during the removal phase have 93 callback that is invoked after they finish. Only readers that are active 101 readers cannot gain a reference to it. 103 b. Wait for all previous readers to complete their RCU read-side 106 c. At this point, there cannot be any readers who hold references [all …]
|
H A D | lockdep.rst | 43 invoked by both RCU readers and updaters. 47 is invoked by both RCU-bh readers and updaters. 51 is invoked by both RCU-sched readers and updaters. 55 is invoked by both SRCU readers and updaters.
|
H A D | listRCU.rst | 54 ``tasklist_lock``. To prevent readers from noticing changes in the list 58 any readers traversing the list will see valid ``p->tasks.next`` pointers 62 all existing readers finish, which guarantees that the ``task_struct`` 64 of all RCU readers that might possibly have a reference to that object. 210 need for writers to exclude readers. 217 readers to fail spectacularly. 219 So, when readers can tolerate stale data and when entries are either added or
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/locking/ |
H A D | lockdep-design.rst | 405 spin_lock() or write_lock()), non-recursive readers (i.e. shared lockers, like 406 down_read()) and recursive readers (recursive shared lockers, like rcu_read_lock()). 410 r: stands for non-recursive readers. 411 R: stands for recursive readers. 412 S: stands for all readers (non-recursive + recursive), as both are shared lockers. 413 N: stands for writers and non-recursive readers, as both are not recursive. 417 Recursive readers, as their name indicates, are the lockers allowed to acquire 421 While non-recursive readers will cause a self deadlock if trying to acquire inside 424 The difference between recursive readers and non-recursive readers is because: 425 recursive readers get blocked only by a write lock *holder*, while non-recursive [all …]
|
H A D | seqlock.rst | 9 lockless readers (read-only retry loops), and no writer starvation. They 23 is odd and indicates to the readers that an update is in progress. At 25 even again which lets readers make progress. 153 from interruption by readers. This is typically the case when the read 195 1. Normal Sequence readers which never block a writer but they must 206 2. Locking readers which will wait if a writer or another locking reader 218 according to a passed marker. This is used to avoid lockless readers
|
H A D | locktypes.rst | 95 readers. 135 rw_semaphore is a multiple readers and single writer lock mechanism. 141 exist special-purpose interfaces that allow non-owner release for readers. 151 readers, a preempted low-priority reader will continue holding its lock, 152 thus starving even high-priority writers. In contrast, because readers 155 writer from starving readers. 299 rwlock_t is a multiple readers and single writer lock mechanism. 314 readers, a preempted low-priority reader will continue holding its lock, 315 thus starving even high-priority writers. In contrast, because readers 318 preventing that writer from starving readers.
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ |
H A D | event.c | 30 list_for_each_entry(reader, &sp->event_buffer->readers, node) in wake_up_event_readers() 123 list_add(&reader->node, &sp->event_buffer->readers); in ibmasm_event_reader_register() 153 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buffer->readers); in ibmasm_event_buffer_init()
|
/openbmc/phosphor-webui/app/common/styles/elements/ |
H A D | paginate.scss | 48 /* screen readers only */ 88 /* screen readers only */ 100 /* screen readers only */ 126 /* screen readers only */
|
/openbmc/linux/fs/ |
H A D | pipe.c | 413 !READ_ONCE(pipe->readers); in pipe_writable() 446 if (!pipe->readers) { in pipe_write() 487 if (!pipe->readers) { in pipe_write() 698 if (!pipe->readers) in pipe_poll() 727 pipe->readers--; in pipe_release() 732 if (!pipe->readers != !pipe->writers) { in pipe_release() 893 pipe->readers = pipe->writers = 1; in get_pipe_inode() 1148 if (pipe->readers++ == 0) in fifo_open() 1170 if (!is_pipe && (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) && !pipe->readers) in fifo_open() 1177 if (!is_pipe && !pipe->readers) { in fifo_open() [all …]
|
/openbmc/qemu/tests/unit/ |
H A D | test-rcu-list.c | 351 int duration = 0, readers = 0; in main() local 371 readers = strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 0); in main() 373 if (duration && readers) { in main() 374 rcu_qtest(argv[0], duration, readers); in main()
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/soc/aspeed/ |
H A D | aspeed-p2a-ctrl.c | 65 u32 readers; member 192 ctrl->readers += 1; in aspeed_p2a_ioctl() 275 priv->parent->readers -= priv->read; in aspeed_p2a_release() 299 if (!open_regions && priv->parent->readers == 0) in aspeed_p2a_release()
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/hid/ |
H A D | hid-roccat.c | 47 struct list_head readers; member 191 list_add_tail(&reader->node, &device->readers); in roccat_open() 270 list_for_each_entry(reader, &device->readers, node) { in roccat_report_event() 339 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->readers); in roccat_connect()
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/iio/ |
H A D | TODO | 14 to state struct and using property handlers and readers.
|
/openbmc/openbmc/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/openct/ |
H A D | openct_0.6.20.bb | 4 OpenCT implements drivers for several smart card readers. \ 9 readers to remote machines via TCP/IP."
|
/openbmc/openbmc/meta-openembedded/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/ |
H A D | python3-pyatspi_2.46.1.bb | 2 …PI2 is a protocol over DBus, toolkit widgets use to provide content to screen readers such as Orca"
|
/openbmc/qemu/docs/devel/ |
H A D | rcu.rst | 9 RCU supports concurrency between a single writer and multiple readers, 33 readers will not be able to get a reference to the old data. After 37 there cannot be any readers who hold references to the data structure, 154 with readers, if the updater never mutates a field within a 155 data item that is already accessible to readers. This is the 158 before ``qatomic_rcu_set()`` makes the data item visible to readers.
|