Searched refs:qemu_lockcnt_inc (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
50 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&accel_in_ioctl_lock); in accel_ioctl_begin()71 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&cpu->in_ioctl_lock); in accel_cpu_ioctl_begin()
192 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); in aio_prepare()234 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); in aio_pending()316 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); in aio_dispatch()361 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); in aio_poll()
229 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); in poll_set_started()279 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); in aio_pending()423 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); in aio_dispatch()623 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); in aio_poll()
112 void qemu_lockcnt_inc(QemuLockCnt *lockcnt) in qemu_lockcnt_inc() function309 void qemu_lockcnt_inc(QemuLockCnt *lockcnt) in qemu_lockcnt_inc() function
197 Accessing the value can be done between ``qemu_lockcnt_inc`` and200 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&xyz_lockcnt);210 is zero (i.e. there is no concurrent visit). Because ``qemu_lockcnt_inc``224 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&xyz_lockcnt);238 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&io_handlers_lockcnt);261 qemu_lockcnt_inc(&io_handlers_lockcnt);
63 void qemu_lockcnt_inc(QemuLockCnt *lockcnt);