Searched hist:e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/kernel/irq/ |
| H A D | settings.h | diff e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c Fri Oct 09 16:28:58 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> genirq: Add flag to force mask in disable_irq[_nosync]()
If an irq chip does not implement the irq_disable callback, then we
use a lazy approach for disabling the interrupt. That means that the
interrupt is marked disabled, but the interrupt line is not
immediately masked in the interrupt chip. It only becomes masked if
the interrupt is raised while it's marked disabled. We use this to avoid
possibly expensive mask/unmask operations for common case operations.
Unfortunately there are devices which do not allow the interrupt to be
disabled easily at the device level. They are forced to use
disable_irq_nosync(). This can result in taking each interrupt twice.
Instead of enforcing the non lazy mode on all interrupts of a irq
chip, provide a settings flag, which can be set by the driver for that
particular interrupt line.
Reported-and-tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1510092348370.6097@nanos
|
| H A D | chip.c | diff e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c Fri Oct 09 16:28:58 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> genirq: Add flag to force mask in disable_irq[_nosync]()
If an irq chip does not implement the irq_disable callback, then we
use a lazy approach for disabling the interrupt. That means that the
interrupt is marked disabled, but the interrupt line is not
immediately masked in the interrupt chip. It only becomes masked if
the interrupt is raised while it's marked disabled. We use this to avoid
possibly expensive mask/unmask operations for common case operations.
Unfortunately there are devices which do not allow the interrupt to be
disabled easily at the device level. They are forced to use
disable_irq_nosync(). This can result in taking each interrupt twice.
Instead of enforcing the non lazy mode on all interrupts of a irq
chip, provide a settings flag, which can be set by the driver for that
particular interrupt line.
Reported-and-tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1510092348370.6097@nanos
|
| H A D | manage.c | diff e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c Fri Oct 09 16:28:58 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> genirq: Add flag to force mask in disable_irq[_nosync]()
If an irq chip does not implement the irq_disable callback, then we
use a lazy approach for disabling the interrupt. That means that the
interrupt is marked disabled, but the interrupt line is not
immediately masked in the interrupt chip. It only becomes masked if
the interrupt is raised while it's marked disabled. We use this to avoid
possibly expensive mask/unmask operations for common case operations.
Unfortunately there are devices which do not allow the interrupt to be
disabled easily at the device level. They are forced to use
disable_irq_nosync(). This can result in taking each interrupt twice.
Instead of enforcing the non lazy mode on all interrupts of a irq
chip, provide a settings flag, which can be set by the driver for that
particular interrupt line.
Reported-and-tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1510092348370.6097@nanos
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/dma/ |
| H A D | xgene-dma.c | diff b0b79024627fcbd4b4531f4e2bc8e133c8fb6a95 Wed Dec 23 06:58:15 CST 2015 Rameshwar Prasad Sahu <rsahu@apm.com> dmaengine: xgene-dma: Fix double IRQ issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag
For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line.
Reference: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c
Signed-off-by: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu <rsahu@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | irq.h | diff e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c Fri Oct 09 16:28:58 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> genirq: Add flag to force mask in disable_irq[_nosync]()
If an irq chip does not implement the irq_disable callback, then we
use a lazy approach for disabling the interrupt. That means that the
interrupt is marked disabled, but the interrupt line is not
immediately masked in the interrupt chip. It only becomes masked if
the interrupt is raised while it's marked disabled. We use this to avoid
possibly expensive mask/unmask operations for common case operations.
Unfortunately there are devices which do not allow the interrupt to be
disabled easily at the device level. They are forced to use
disable_irq_nosync(). This can result in taking each interrupt twice.
Instead of enforcing the non lazy mode on all interrupts of a irq
chip, provide a settings flag, which can be set by the driver for that
particular interrupt line.
Reported-and-tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1510092348370.6097@nanos
|