Searched hist:db3540522e955c1ebb391f4f5324dff4f20ecd09 (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/ceph/ |
| H A D | mds_client.h | diff db3540522e955c1ebb391f4f5324dff4f20ecd09 Tue May 24 13:46:31 CDT 2011 Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> ceph: fix cap flush race reentrancy
In e9964c10 we change cap flushing to do a delicate dance because some
inodes on the cap_dirty list could be in a migrating state (got EXPORT but
not IMPORT) in which we couldn't actually flush and move from
dirty->flushing, breaking the while (!empty) { process first } loop
structure. It worked for a single sync thread, but was not reentrant and
triggered infinite loops when multiple syncers came along.
Instead, move inodes with dirty to a separate cap_dirty_migrating list
when in the limbo export-but-no-import state, allowing us to go back to
the simple loop structure (which was reentrant). This is cleaner and more
robust.
Audited the cap_dirty users and this looks fine:
list_empty(&ci->i_dirty_item) is still a reliable indicator of whether we
have dirty caps (which list we're on is irrelevant) and list_del_init()
calls still do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
|
| H A D | caps.c | diff db3540522e955c1ebb391f4f5324dff4f20ecd09 Tue May 24 13:46:31 CDT 2011 Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> ceph: fix cap flush race reentrancy
In e9964c10 we change cap flushing to do a delicate dance because some
inodes on the cap_dirty list could be in a migrating state (got EXPORT but
not IMPORT) in which we couldn't actually flush and move from
dirty->flushing, breaking the while (!empty) { process first } loop
structure. It worked for a single sync thread, but was not reentrant and
triggered infinite loops when multiple syncers came along.
Instead, move inodes with dirty to a separate cap_dirty_migrating list
when in the limbo export-but-no-import state, allowing us to go back to
the simple loop structure (which was reentrant). This is cleaner and more
robust.
Audited the cap_dirty users and this looks fine:
list_empty(&ci->i_dirty_item) is still a reliable indicator of whether we
have dirty caps (which list we're on is irrelevant) and list_del_init()
calls still do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
|
| H A D | mds_client.c | diff db3540522e955c1ebb391f4f5324dff4f20ecd09 Tue May 24 13:46:31 CDT 2011 Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> ceph: fix cap flush race reentrancy
In e9964c10 we change cap flushing to do a delicate dance because some
inodes on the cap_dirty list could be in a migrating state (got EXPORT but
not IMPORT) in which we couldn't actually flush and move from
dirty->flushing, breaking the while (!empty) { process first } loop
structure. It worked for a single sync thread, but was not reentrant and
triggered infinite loops when multiple syncers came along.
Instead, move inodes with dirty to a separate cap_dirty_migrating list
when in the limbo export-but-no-import state, allowing us to go back to
the simple loop structure (which was reentrant). This is cleaner and more
robust.
Audited the cap_dirty users and this looks fine:
list_empty(&ci->i_dirty_item) is still a reliable indicator of whether we
have dirty caps (which list we're on is irrelevant) and list_del_init()
calls still do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
|