Searched hist:da31894ed7b654e2e1741e7ac4ef6c15be0dd14b (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/security/ |
| H A D | Makefile | diff da31894ed7b654e2e1741e7ac4ef6c15be0dd14b Fri Aug 22 10:35:57 CDT 2008 Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> securityfs: do not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY
Add a new Kconfig option SECURITYFS which will build securityfs support
but does not require CONFIG_SECURITY. The only current user of
securityfs does not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY and there is no reason the
full LSM needs to be built to build this fs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
|
| H A D | Kconfig | diff da31894ed7b654e2e1741e7ac4ef6c15be0dd14b Fri Aug 22 10:35:57 CDT 2008 Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> securityfs: do not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY
Add a new Kconfig option SECURITYFS which will build securityfs support
but does not require CONFIG_SECURITY. The only current user of
securityfs does not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY and there is no reason the
full LSM needs to be built to build this fs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/char/tpm/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | diff da31894ed7b654e2e1741e7ac4ef6c15be0dd14b Fri Aug 22 10:35:57 CDT 2008 Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> securityfs: do not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY
Add a new Kconfig option SECURITYFS which will build securityfs support
but does not require CONFIG_SECURITY. The only current user of
securityfs does not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY and there is no reason the
full LSM needs to be built to build this fs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | security.h | diff da31894ed7b654e2e1741e7ac4ef6c15be0dd14b Fri Aug 22 10:35:57 CDT 2008 Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> securityfs: do not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY
Add a new Kconfig option SECURITYFS which will build securityfs support
but does not require CONFIG_SECURITY. The only current user of
securityfs does not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY and there is no reason the
full LSM needs to be built to build this fs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
|