Searched hist:d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc (Results 1 – 8 of 8) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/net/rxrpc/ |
| H A D | protocol.h | diff d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Fri Oct 07 11:44:39 CDT 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.
If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.
This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | insecure.c | diff d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Fri Oct 07 11:44:39 CDT 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.
If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.
This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | rxkad.c | diff d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Fri Oct 07 11:44:39 CDT 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.
If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.
This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | recvmsg.c | diff d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Fri Oct 07 11:44:39 CDT 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.
If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.
This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | output.c | diff d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Fri Oct 07 11:44:39 CDT 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.
If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.
This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | input.c | diff d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Fri Oct 07 11:44:39 CDT 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.
If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.
This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | ar-internal.h | diff d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Fri Oct 07 11:44:39 CDT 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.
If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.
This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/trace/events/ |
| H A D | rxrpc.h | diff d4d02d8bb5c412d977af7ea7c7ea91977a6a64dc Fri Oct 07 11:44:39 CDT 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Clone received jumbo subpackets and queue separately
Split up received jumbo packets into separate skbuffs by cloning the
original skbuff for each subpacket and setting the offset and length of the
data in that subpacket in the skbuff's private data. The subpackets are
then placed on the recvmsg queue separately. The security class then gets
to revise the offset and length to remove its metadata.
If we fail to clone a packet, we just drop it and let the peer resend it.
The original packet gets used for the final subpacket.
This should make it easier to handle parallel decryption of the subpackets.
It also simplifies the handling of lost or misordered packets in the
queuing/buffering loop as the possibility of overlapping jumbo packets no
longer needs to be considered.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|