Searched hist:ce4f660862359f2172ff4e3df30e641df5475cf6 (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
/openbmc/linux/tools/bpf/bpftool/ |
H A D | jit_disasm.c | diff ce4f660862359f2172ff4e3df30e641df5475cf6 Tue Oct 25 10:03:28 CDT 2022 Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> bpftool: Support setting alternative arch for JIT disasm with LLVM
For offloaded BPF programs, instead of failing to create the LLVM disassembler without even looking for a triple at all, do run the function that attempts to retrieve a valid architecture name for the device.
It will still fail for the LLVM disassembler, because currently we have no valid triple to return (NFP disassembly is not supported by LLVM). But failing in that function is more logical than to assume in jit_disasm.c that passing an "arch" name is simply not supported.
Suggested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025150329.97371-8-quentin@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
H A D | common.c | diff ce4f660862359f2172ff4e3df30e641df5475cf6 Tue Oct 25 10:03:28 CDT 2022 Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> bpftool: Support setting alternative arch for JIT disasm with LLVM
For offloaded BPF programs, instead of failing to create the LLVM disassembler without even looking for a triple at all, do run the function that attempts to retrieve a valid architecture name for the device.
It will still fail for the LLVM disassembler, because currently we have no valid triple to return (NFP disassembly is not supported by LLVM). But failing in that function is more logical than to assume in jit_disasm.c that passing an "arch" name is simply not supported.
Suggested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025150329.97371-8-quentin@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
H A D | main.h | diff ce4f660862359f2172ff4e3df30e641df5475cf6 Tue Oct 25 10:03:28 CDT 2022 Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> bpftool: Support setting alternative arch for JIT disasm with LLVM
For offloaded BPF programs, instead of failing to create the LLVM disassembler without even looking for a triple at all, do run the function that attempts to retrieve a valid architecture name for the device.
It will still fail for the LLVM disassembler, because currently we have no valid triple to return (NFP disassembly is not supported by LLVM). But failing in that function is more logical than to assume in jit_disasm.c that passing an "arch" name is simply not supported.
Suggested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025150329.97371-8-quentin@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
H A D | prog.c | diff ce4f660862359f2172ff4e3df30e641df5475cf6 Tue Oct 25 10:03:28 CDT 2022 Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> bpftool: Support setting alternative arch for JIT disasm with LLVM
For offloaded BPF programs, instead of failing to create the LLVM disassembler without even looking for a triple at all, do run the function that attempts to retrieve a valid architecture name for the device.
It will still fail for the LLVM disassembler, because currently we have no valid triple to return (NFP disassembly is not supported by LLVM). But failing in that function is more logical than to assume in jit_disasm.c that passing an "arch" name is simply not supported.
Suggested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025150329.97371-8-quentin@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|