Searched hist:c65ea996595005be470fbfa16711deba414fd33b (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | ipmi_smi.h | diff c65ea996595005be470fbfa16711deba414fd33b Tue Oct 23 11:29:02 CDT 2018 Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> ipmi: Fix how the lower layers are told to watch for messages
The IPMI driver has a mechanism to tell the lower layers it needs
to watch for messages, commands, and watchdogs (so it doesn't
needlessly poll). However, it needed some extensions, it needed
a way to tell what is being waited for so it could set the timeout
appropriately.
The update to the lower layer was also being done once a second
at best because it was done in the main timeout handler. However,
if a command is sent and a response message is coming back,
it needed to be started immediately. So modify the code to
update immediately if it needs to be enabled. Disable is still
lazy.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Tested-by: Kamlakant Patel <kamlakant.patel@cavium.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/char/ipmi/ |
| H A D | ipmi_ssif.c | diff c65ea996595005be470fbfa16711deba414fd33b Tue Oct 23 11:29:02 CDT 2018 Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> ipmi: Fix how the lower layers are told to watch for messages
The IPMI driver has a mechanism to tell the lower layers it needs
to watch for messages, commands, and watchdogs (so it doesn't
needlessly poll). However, it needed some extensions, it needed
a way to tell what is being waited for so it could set the timeout
appropriately.
The update to the lower layer was also being done once a second
at best because it was done in the main timeout handler. However,
if a command is sent and a response message is coming back,
it needed to be started immediately. So modify the code to
update immediately if it needs to be enabled. Disable is still
lazy.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Tested-by: Kamlakant Patel <kamlakant.patel@cavium.com>
|
| H A D | ipmi_msghandler.c | diff c65ea996595005be470fbfa16711deba414fd33b Tue Oct 23 11:29:02 CDT 2018 Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> ipmi: Fix how the lower layers are told to watch for messages
The IPMI driver has a mechanism to tell the lower layers it needs
to watch for messages, commands, and watchdogs (so it doesn't
needlessly poll). However, it needed some extensions, it needed
a way to tell what is being waited for so it could set the timeout
appropriately.
The update to the lower layer was also being done once a second
at best because it was done in the main timeout handler. However,
if a command is sent and a response message is coming back,
it needed to be started immediately. So modify the code to
update immediately if it needs to be enabled. Disable is still
lazy.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Tested-by: Kamlakant Patel <kamlakant.patel@cavium.com>
|
| H A D | ipmi_si_intf.c | diff c65ea996595005be470fbfa16711deba414fd33b Tue Oct 23 11:29:02 CDT 2018 Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> ipmi: Fix how the lower layers are told to watch for messages
The IPMI driver has a mechanism to tell the lower layers it needs
to watch for messages, commands, and watchdogs (so it doesn't
needlessly poll). However, it needed some extensions, it needed
a way to tell what is being waited for so it could set the timeout
appropriately.
The update to the lower layer was also being done once a second
at best because it was done in the main timeout handler. However,
if a command is sent and a response message is coming back,
it needed to be started immediately. So modify the code to
update immediately if it needs to be enabled. Disable is still
lazy.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Tested-by: Kamlakant Patel <kamlakant.patel@cavium.com>
|