Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:bc7ed4d30815bc434c1e49dc6784164b352d167c (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
H A Di915_perf.hdiff bc7ed4d30815bc434c1e49dc6784164b352d167c Wed Oct 26 17:20:58 CDT 2022 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> drm/i915/perf: Apply Wa_18013179988

OA reports in the OA buffer contain an OA timestamp field that helps
user calculate delta between 2 OA reports. The calculation relies on the
CS timestamp frequency to convert the timestamp value to nanoseconds.
The CS timestamp frequency is a function of the CTC_SHIFT value in
RPM_CONFIG0.

In DG2, OA unit assumes that the CTC_SHIFT is 3, instead of using the
actual value from RPM_CONFIG0. At the user level, this results in an
error in calculating delta between 2 OA reports since the OA timestamp
is not shifted in the same manner as CS timestamp. Also the periodicity
of the reports is different from what the user configured because of
mismatch in the CS and OA frequencies.

The issue also affects MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT command.

To resolve this, return actual OA timestamp frequency to the user in
i915_getparam_ioctl, so that user can calculate the right OA exponent as
well as interpret the reports correctly.

MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/18893

v2:
- Use REG_FIELD_GET (Ashutosh)
- Update commit msg

Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221026222102.5526-13-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
H A Di915_getparam.cdiff bc7ed4d30815bc434c1e49dc6784164b352d167c Wed Oct 26 17:20:58 CDT 2022 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> drm/i915/perf: Apply Wa_18013179988

OA reports in the OA buffer contain an OA timestamp field that helps
user calculate delta between 2 OA reports. The calculation relies on the
CS timestamp frequency to convert the timestamp value to nanoseconds.
The CS timestamp frequency is a function of the CTC_SHIFT value in
RPM_CONFIG0.

In DG2, OA unit assumes that the CTC_SHIFT is 3, instead of using the
actual value from RPM_CONFIG0. At the user level, this results in an
error in calculating delta between 2 OA reports since the OA timestamp
is not shifted in the same manner as CS timestamp. Also the periodicity
of the reports is different from what the user configured because of
mismatch in the CS and OA frequencies.

The issue also affects MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT command.

To resolve this, return actual OA timestamp frequency to the user in
i915_getparam_ioctl, so that user can calculate the right OA exponent as
well as interpret the reports correctly.

MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/18893

v2:
- Use REG_FIELD_GET (Ashutosh)
- Update commit msg

Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221026222102.5526-13-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
H A Di915_perf.cdiff bc7ed4d30815bc434c1e49dc6784164b352d167c Wed Oct 26 17:20:58 CDT 2022 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> drm/i915/perf: Apply Wa_18013179988

OA reports in the OA buffer contain an OA timestamp field that helps
user calculate delta between 2 OA reports. The calculation relies on the
CS timestamp frequency to convert the timestamp value to nanoseconds.
The CS timestamp frequency is a function of the CTC_SHIFT value in
RPM_CONFIG0.

In DG2, OA unit assumes that the CTC_SHIFT is 3, instead of using the
actual value from RPM_CONFIG0. At the user level, this results in an
error in calculating delta between 2 OA reports since the OA timestamp
is not shifted in the same manner as CS timestamp. Also the periodicity
of the reports is different from what the user configured because of
mismatch in the CS and OA frequencies.

The issue also affects MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT command.

To resolve this, return actual OA timestamp frequency to the user in
i915_getparam_ioctl, so that user can calculate the right OA exponent as
well as interpret the reports correctly.

MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/18893

v2:
- Use REG_FIELD_GET (Ashutosh)
- Update commit msg

Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221026222102.5526-13-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
/openbmc/linux/include/uapi/drm/
H A Di915_drm.hdiff bc7ed4d30815bc434c1e49dc6784164b352d167c Wed Oct 26 17:20:58 CDT 2022 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> drm/i915/perf: Apply Wa_18013179988

OA reports in the OA buffer contain an OA timestamp field that helps
user calculate delta between 2 OA reports. The calculation relies on the
CS timestamp frequency to convert the timestamp value to nanoseconds.
The CS timestamp frequency is a function of the CTC_SHIFT value in
RPM_CONFIG0.

In DG2, OA unit assumes that the CTC_SHIFT is 3, instead of using the
actual value from RPM_CONFIG0. At the user level, this results in an
error in calculating delta between 2 OA reports since the OA timestamp
is not shifted in the same manner as CS timestamp. Also the periodicity
of the reports is different from what the user configured because of
mismatch in the CS and OA frequencies.

The issue also affects MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT command.

To resolve this, return actual OA timestamp frequency to the user in
i915_getparam_ioctl, so that user can calculate the right OA exponent as
well as interpret the reports correctly.

MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/18893

v2:
- Use REG_FIELD_GET (Ashutosh)
- Update commit msg

Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221026222102.5526-13-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com