Searched hist:bb0a55bb7148a49e549ee992200860e7a040d3a5 (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | errno.h | diff bb0a55bb7148a49e549ee992200860e7a040d3a5 Fri Aug 20 16:02:06 CDT 2021 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfs: don't allow reexport reclaims
In the reexport case, nfsd is currently passing along locks with the
reclaim bit set. The client sends a new lock request, which is granted
if there's currently no conflict--even if it's possible a conflicting
lock could have been briefly held in the interim.
We don't currently have any way to safely grant reclaim, so for now
let's just deny them all.
I'm doing this by passing the reclaim bit to nfs and letting it fail the
call, with the idea that eventually the client might be able to do
something more forgiving here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | fs.h | diff bb0a55bb7148a49e549ee992200860e7a040d3a5 Fri Aug 20 16:02:06 CDT 2021 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfs: don't allow reexport reclaims
In the reexport case, nfsd is currently passing along locks with the
reclaim bit set. The client sends a new lock request, which is granted
if there's currently no conflict--even if it's possible a conflicting
lock could have been briefly held in the interim.
We don't currently have any way to safely grant reclaim, so for now
let's just deny them all.
I'm doing this by passing the reclaim bit to nfs and letting it fail the
call, with the idea that eventually the client might be able to do
something more forgiving here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/nfsd/ |
| H A D | nfsproc.c | diff bb0a55bb7148a49e549ee992200860e7a040d3a5 Fri Aug 20 16:02:06 CDT 2021 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfs: don't allow reexport reclaims
In the reexport case, nfsd is currently passing along locks with the
reclaim bit set. The client sends a new lock request, which is granted
if there's currently no conflict--even if it's possible a conflicting
lock could have been briefly held in the interim.
We don't currently have any way to safely grant reclaim, so for now
let's just deny them all.
I'm doing this by passing the reclaim bit to nfs and letting it fail the
call, with the idea that eventually the client might be able to do
something more forgiving here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | nfs4state.c | diff bb0a55bb7148a49e549ee992200860e7a040d3a5 Fri Aug 20 16:02:06 CDT 2021 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfs: don't allow reexport reclaims
In the reexport case, nfsd is currently passing along locks with the
reclaim bit set. The client sends a new lock request, which is granted
if there's currently no conflict--even if it's possible a conflicting
lock could have been briefly held in the interim.
We don't currently have any way to safely grant reclaim, so for now
let's just deny them all.
I'm doing this by passing the reclaim bit to nfs and letting it fail the
call, with the idea that eventually the client might be able to do
something more forgiving here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/nfs/ |
| H A D | file.c | diff bb0a55bb7148a49e549ee992200860e7a040d3a5 Fri Aug 20 16:02:06 CDT 2021 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfs: don't allow reexport reclaims
In the reexport case, nfsd is currently passing along locks with the
reclaim bit set. The client sends a new lock request, which is granted
if there's currently no conflict--even if it's possible a conflicting
lock could have been briefly held in the interim.
We don't currently have any way to safely grant reclaim, so for now
let's just deny them all.
I'm doing this by passing the reclaim bit to nfs and letting it fail the
call, with the idea that eventually the client might be able to do
something more forgiving here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|