Searched hist:b939d1e04a90248b4cdf417b0969c270ceb992b2 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/ |
| H A D | taprio.json | diff b939d1e04a90248b4cdf417b0969c270ceb992b2 Mon May 27 10:39:55 CDT 2024 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> net/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too
[ Upstream commit fb66df20a7201e60f2b13d7f95d031b31a8831d3 ]
It is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the
blamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a
cycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of
entry intervals.
We need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must
be larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule
entries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle
time came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so
we move the existing "cycle == 0" check outside the "if "(!new->cycle_time)"
branch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.
Add a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.
Fixes: b5b73b26b3ca ("taprio: Fix allowing too small intervals")
Reported-by: syzbot+a7d2b1d5d1af83035567@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/0000000000007d66bc06196e7c66@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240527153955.553333-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/sched/ |
| H A D | sch_taprio.c | diff b939d1e04a90248b4cdf417b0969c270ceb992b2 Mon May 27 10:39:55 CDT 2024 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> net/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too
[ Upstream commit fb66df20a7201e60f2b13d7f95d031b31a8831d3 ]
It is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the
blamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a
cycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of
entry intervals.
We need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must
be larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule
entries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle
time came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so
we move the existing "cycle == 0" check outside the "if "(!new->cycle_time)"
branch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.
Add a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.
Fixes: b5b73b26b3ca ("taprio: Fix allowing too small intervals")
Reported-by: syzbot+a7d2b1d5d1af83035567@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/0000000000007d66bc06196e7c66@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240527153955.553333-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|