/openbmc/linux/drivers/scsi/libsas/ |
H A D | sas_event.c | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|
H A D | sas_internal.h | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|
H A D | sas_init.c | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|
H A D | sas_discover.c | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/scsi/isci/ |
H A D | host.c | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/ |
H A D | aic94xx_init.c | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/scsi/mvsas/ |
H A D | mv_sas.c | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/include/scsi/ |
H A D | libsas.h | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/scsi/pm8001/ |
H A D | pm8001_sas.c | diff b1124cd3ec97406c767b90bf7e93ecd2d2915592 Mon Dec 19 18:42:34 CST 2011 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [SCSI] libsas: introduce sas_drain_work()
When an lldd invokes ->notify_port_event() it can trigger a chain of libsas events to:
1/ form the port and find the direct attached device
2/ if the attached device is an expander perform domain discovery
A call to flush_workqueue() will only flush the initial port formation work. Currently libsas users need to call scsi_flush_work() up to the max depth of chain (which will grow from 2 to 3 when ata discovery is moved to its own discovery event). Instead of open coding multiple calls switch to use drain_workqueue() to flush sas work.
drain_workqueue() does not handle new work submitted during the drain so libsas needs a bit of infrastructure to hold off unchained work submissions while a drain is in flight. A lldd ->notify() event is considered 'unchained' while a sas_discover_event() is 'chained'. As Tejun notes:
"For now, I think it would be best to add private wrapper in libsas to support deferring unchained work items while draining."
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
|