Searched hist:"9 e90f30e78572ecfc1c74c735a034c955d822ba6" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/verity/ |
| H A D | signature.c | diff 9e90f30e78572ecfc1c74c735a034c955d822ba6 Fri Nov 13 15:19:16 CST 2020 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> fs-verity: rename fsverity_signed_digest to fsverity_formatted_digest
The name "struct fsverity_signed_digest" is causing confusion because it
isn't actually a signed digest, but rather it's the way that the digest
is formatted in order to be signed. Rename it to
"struct fsverity_formatted_digest" to prevent this confusion.
Also update the struct's comment to clarify that it's specific to the
built-in signature verification support and isn't a requirement for all
fs-verity users.
I'll be renaming this struct in fsverity-utils too.
Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113211918.71883-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
|
| H A D | fsverity_private.h | diff 9e90f30e78572ecfc1c74c735a034c955d822ba6 Fri Nov 13 15:19:16 CST 2020 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> fs-verity: rename fsverity_signed_digest to fsverity_formatted_digest
The name "struct fsverity_signed_digest" is causing confusion because it
isn't actually a signed digest, but rather it's the way that the digest
is formatted in order to be signed. Rename it to
"struct fsverity_formatted_digest" to prevent this confusion.
Also update the struct's comment to clarify that it's specific to the
built-in signature verification support and isn't a requirement for all
fs-verity users.
I'll be renaming this struct in fsverity-utils too.
Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113211918.71883-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/Documentation/filesystems/ |
| H A D | fsverity.rst | diff 9e90f30e78572ecfc1c74c735a034c955d822ba6 Fri Nov 13 15:19:16 CST 2020 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> fs-verity: rename fsverity_signed_digest to fsverity_formatted_digest
The name "struct fsverity_signed_digest" is causing confusion because it
isn't actually a signed digest, but rather it's the way that the digest
is formatted in order to be signed. Rename it to
"struct fsverity_formatted_digest" to prevent this confusion.
Also update the struct's comment to clarify that it's specific to the
built-in signature verification support and isn't a requirement for all
fs-verity users.
I'll be renaming this struct in fsverity-utils too.
Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113211918.71883-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
|