Searched hist:"9 d7fb04276481c59610983362d8e023d262b58ca" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/kernel/sched/ |
| H A D | cputime.c | diff 9d7fb04276481c59610983362d8e023d262b58ca Tue Jun 30 04:30:54 CDT 2015 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> sched/cputime: Guarantee stime + utime == rtime
While the current code guarantees monotonicity for stime and utime
independently of one another, it does not guarantee that the sum of
both is equal to the total time we started out with.
This confuses things (and peoples) who look at this sum, like top, and
will report >100% usage followed by a matching period of 0%.
Rework the code to provide both individual monotonicity and a coherent
sum.
Suggested-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: jason.low2@hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | init_task.h | diff 9d7fb04276481c59610983362d8e023d262b58ca Tue Jun 30 04:30:54 CDT 2015 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> sched/cputime: Guarantee stime + utime == rtime
While the current code guarantees monotonicity for stime and utime
independently of one another, it does not guarantee that the sum of
both is equal to the total time we started out with.
This confuses things (and peoples) who look at this sum, like top, and
will report >100% usage followed by a matching period of 0%.
Rework the code to provide both individual monotonicity and a coherent
sum.
Suggested-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: jason.low2@hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | sched.h | diff 9d7fb04276481c59610983362d8e023d262b58ca Tue Jun 30 04:30:54 CDT 2015 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> sched/cputime: Guarantee stime + utime == rtime
While the current code guarantees monotonicity for stime and utime
independently of one another, it does not guarantee that the sum of
both is equal to the total time we started out with.
This confuses things (and peoples) who look at this sum, like top, and
will report >100% usage followed by a matching period of 0%.
Rework the code to provide both individual monotonicity and a coherent
sum.
Suggested-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: jason.low2@hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/kernel/ |
| H A D | fork.c | diff 9d7fb04276481c59610983362d8e023d262b58ca Tue Jun 30 04:30:54 CDT 2015 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> sched/cputime: Guarantee stime + utime == rtime
While the current code guarantees monotonicity for stime and utime
independently of one another, it does not guarantee that the sum of
both is equal to the total time we started out with.
This confuses things (and peoples) who look at this sum, like top, and
will report >100% usage followed by a matching period of 0%.
Rework the code to provide both individual monotonicity and a coherent
sum.
Suggested-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: jason.low2@hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|