Searched hist:"99 f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c" (Results 1 – 8 of 8) sorted by relevance
/openbmc/linux/include/net/ |
H A D | sock_reuseport.h | diff 99f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c Thu Jun 13 17:00:01 CDT 2019 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF
There is SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF but there is no DETACH. This patch adds SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF sockopt. The same sockopt can be used to undo both SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF.
reseport_detach_prog() is added and it is mostly a mirror of the existing reuseport_attach_prog(). The differences are, it does not call reuseport_alloc() and returns -ENOENT when there is no old prog.
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
/openbmc/linux/net/core/ |
H A D | sock_reuseport.c | diff 99f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c Thu Jun 13 17:00:01 CDT 2019 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF
There is SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF but there is no DETACH. This patch adds SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF sockopt. The same sockopt can be used to undo both SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF.
reseport_detach_prog() is added and it is mostly a mirror of the existing reuseport_attach_prog(). The differences are, it does not call reuseport_alloc() and returns -ENOENT when there is no old prog.
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
H A D | sock.c | diff 99f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c Thu Jun 13 17:00:01 CDT 2019 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF
There is SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF but there is no DETACH. This patch adds SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF sockopt. The same sockopt can be used to undo both SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF.
reseport_detach_prog() is added and it is mostly a mirror of the existing reuseport_attach_prog(). The differences are, it does not call reuseport_alloc() and returns -ENOENT when there is no old prog.
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/ |
H A D | socket.h | diff 99f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c Thu Jun 13 17:00:01 CDT 2019 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF
There is SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF but there is no DETACH. This patch adds SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF sockopt. The same sockopt can be used to undo both SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF.
reseport_detach_prog() is added and it is mostly a mirror of the existing reuseport_attach_prog(). The differences are, it does not call reuseport_alloc() and returns -ENOENT when there is no old prog.
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ |
H A D | socket.h | diff 99f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c Thu Jun 13 17:00:01 CDT 2019 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF
There is SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF but there is no DETACH. This patch adds SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF sockopt. The same sockopt can be used to undo both SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF.
reseport_detach_prog() is added and it is mostly a mirror of the existing reuseport_attach_prog(). The differences are, it does not call reuseport_alloc() and returns -ENOENT when there is no old prog.
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/ |
H A D | socket.h | diff 99f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c Thu Jun 13 17:00:01 CDT 2019 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF
There is SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF but there is no DETACH. This patch adds SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF sockopt. The same sockopt can be used to undo both SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF.
reseport_detach_prog() is added and it is mostly a mirror of the existing reuseport_attach_prog(). The differences are, it does not call reuseport_alloc() and returns -ENOENT when there is no old prog.
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/ |
H A D | socket.h | diff 99f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c Thu Jun 13 17:00:01 CDT 2019 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF
There is SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF but there is no DETACH. This patch adds SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF sockopt. The same sockopt can be used to undo both SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF.
reseport_detach_prog() is added and it is mostly a mirror of the existing reuseport_attach_prog(). The differences are, it does not call reuseport_alloc() and returns -ENOENT when there is no old prog.
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
/openbmc/linux/include/uapi/asm-generic/ |
H A D | socket.h | diff 99f3a064bc2e4bd5fe50218646c5be342f2ad18c Thu Jun 13 17:00:01 CDT 2019 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF
There is SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF but there is no DETACH. This patch adds SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF sockopt. The same sockopt can be used to undo both SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF.
reseport_detach_prog() is added and it is mostly a mirror of the existing reuseport_attach_prog(). The differences are, it does not call reuseport_alloc() and returns -ENOENT when there is no old prog.
Cc: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|