Searched hist:"953923 c09fe83255ae11845db1c9eb576ba73df8" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
/openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
H A D | device-mapper.h | diff 953923c09fe83255ae11845db1c9eb576ba73df8 Thu Oct 11 10:06:29 CDT 2018 Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> dm: rename DM_TYPE_MQ_REQUEST_BASED to DM_TYPE_REQUEST_BASED
Now that request-based DM is only using blk-mq, there is no need to differentiate between legacy "rq" and new "mq". We're back to a single request-based DM -- and there was much rejoicing!
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/md/ |
H A D | dm-mpath.c | diff 953923c09fe83255ae11845db1c9eb576ba73df8 Thu Oct 11 10:06:29 CDT 2018 Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> dm: rename DM_TYPE_MQ_REQUEST_BASED to DM_TYPE_REQUEST_BASED
Now that request-based DM is only using blk-mq, there is no need to differentiate between legacy "rq" and new "mq". We're back to a single request-based DM -- and there was much rejoicing!
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
|
H A D | dm-table.c | diff 953923c09fe83255ae11845db1c9eb576ba73df8 Thu Oct 11 10:06:29 CDT 2018 Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> dm: rename DM_TYPE_MQ_REQUEST_BASED to DM_TYPE_REQUEST_BASED
Now that request-based DM is only using blk-mq, there is no need to differentiate between legacy "rq" and new "mq". We're back to a single request-based DM -- and there was much rejoicing!
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
|
H A D | dm.c | diff 953923c09fe83255ae11845db1c9eb576ba73df8 Thu Oct 11 10:06:29 CDT 2018 Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> dm: rename DM_TYPE_MQ_REQUEST_BASED to DM_TYPE_REQUEST_BASED
Now that request-based DM is only using blk-mq, there is no need to differentiate between legacy "rq" and new "mq". We're back to a single request-based DM -- and there was much rejoicing!
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
|