| /openbmc/linux/drivers/dma/ppc4xx/ |
| H A D | adma.c | diff 8ac695463f37af902e953d575d3f782e32e170da Tue Mar 06 16:36:27 CST 2012 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> dmaengine: ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies
Ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies in the same way,
so that they all behave in a similar fashion. This means their first
issued cookie will be 2 rather than 1, and will increment to INT_MAX
before returning 1 and starting over.
In connection with this, Dan Williams said:
> Russell King wrote:
> > Secondly, some DMA engine drivers initialize the dma_chan cookie to 0,
> > others to 1. Is there a reason for this, or are these all buggy?
>
> I know that ioat and iop-adma expect 0 to mean "I have cleaned up this
> descriptor and it is idle", and would break if zero was an in-flight
> cookie value. The reserved usage of zero is an driver internal
> concern, but I have no problem formalizing it as a reserved value.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/dma/ |
| H A D | mxs-dma.c | diff 8ac695463f37af902e953d575d3f782e32e170da Tue Mar 06 16:36:27 CST 2012 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> dmaengine: ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies
Ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies in the same way,
so that they all behave in a similar fashion. This means their first
issued cookie will be 2 rather than 1, and will increment to INT_MAX
before returning 1 and starting over.
In connection with this, Dan Williams said:
> Russell King wrote:
> > Secondly, some DMA engine drivers initialize the dma_chan cookie to 0,
> > others to 1. Is there a reason for this, or are these all buggy?
>
> I know that ioat and iop-adma expect 0 to mean "I have cleaned up this
> descriptor and it is idle", and would break if zero was an in-flight
> cookie value. The reserved usage of zero is an driver internal
> concern, but I have no problem formalizing it as a reserved value.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | fsldma.c | diff 8ac695463f37af902e953d575d3f782e32e170da Tue Mar 06 16:36:27 CST 2012 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> dmaengine: ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies
Ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies in the same way,
so that they all behave in a similar fashion. This means their first
issued cookie will be 2 rather than 1, and will increment to INT_MAX
before returning 1 and starting over.
In connection with this, Dan Williams said:
> Russell King wrote:
> > Secondly, some DMA engine drivers initialize the dma_chan cookie to 0,
> > others to 1. Is there a reason for this, or are these all buggy?
>
> I know that ioat and iop-adma expect 0 to mean "I have cleaned up this
> descriptor and it is idle", and would break if zero was an in-flight
> cookie value. The reserved usage of zero is an driver internal
> concern, but I have no problem formalizing it as a reserved value.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | imx-dma.c | diff 8ac695463f37af902e953d575d3f782e32e170da Tue Mar 06 16:36:27 CST 2012 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> dmaengine: ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies
Ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies in the same way,
so that they all behave in a similar fashion. This means their first
issued cookie will be 2 rather than 1, and will increment to INT_MAX
before returning 1 and starting over.
In connection with this, Dan Williams said:
> Russell King wrote:
> > Secondly, some DMA engine drivers initialize the dma_chan cookie to 0,
> > others to 1. Is there a reason for this, or are these all buggy?
>
> I know that ioat and iop-adma expect 0 to mean "I have cleaned up this
> descriptor and it is idle", and would break if zero was an in-flight
> cookie value. The reserved usage of zero is an driver internal
> concern, but I have no problem formalizing it as a reserved value.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | mv_xor.c | diff 8ac695463f37af902e953d575d3f782e32e170da Tue Mar 06 16:36:27 CST 2012 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> dmaengine: ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies
Ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies in the same way,
so that they all behave in a similar fashion. This means their first
issued cookie will be 2 rather than 1, and will increment to INT_MAX
before returning 1 and starting over.
In connection with this, Dan Williams said:
> Russell King wrote:
> > Secondly, some DMA engine drivers initialize the dma_chan cookie to 0,
> > others to 1. Is there a reason for this, or are these all buggy?
>
> I know that ioat and iop-adma expect 0 to mean "I have cleaned up this
> descriptor and it is idle", and would break if zero was an in-flight
> cookie value. The reserved usage of zero is an driver internal
> concern, but I have no problem formalizing it as a reserved value.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | imx-sdma.c | diff 8ac695463f37af902e953d575d3f782e32e170da Tue Mar 06 16:36:27 CST 2012 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> dmaengine: ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies
Ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies in the same way,
so that they all behave in a similar fashion. This means their first
issued cookie will be 2 rather than 1, and will increment to INT_MAX
before returning 1 and starting over.
In connection with this, Dan Williams said:
> Russell King wrote:
> > Secondly, some DMA engine drivers initialize the dma_chan cookie to 0,
> > others to 1. Is there a reason for this, or are these all buggy?
>
> I know that ioat and iop-adma expect 0 to mean "I have cleaned up this
> descriptor and it is idle", and would break if zero was an in-flight
> cookie value. The reserved usage of zero is an driver internal
> concern, but I have no problem formalizing it as a reserved value.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/dma/ioat/ |
| H A D | dma.c | diff 8ac695463f37af902e953d575d3f782e32e170da Tue Mar 06 16:36:27 CST 2012 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> dmaengine: ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies
Ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies in the same way,
so that they all behave in a similar fashion. This means their first
issued cookie will be 2 rather than 1, and will increment to INT_MAX
before returning 1 and starting over.
In connection with this, Dan Williams said:
> Russell King wrote:
> > Secondly, some DMA engine drivers initialize the dma_chan cookie to 0,
> > others to 1. Is there a reason for this, or are these all buggy?
>
> I know that ioat and iop-adma expect 0 to mean "I have cleaned up this
> descriptor and it is idle", and would break if zero was an in-flight
> cookie value. The reserved usage of zero is an driver internal
> concern, but I have no problem formalizing it as a reserved value.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
|