Searched hist:"898 f55f50a00f56dac1ef55f5478c10a7511d0a6" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ |
| H A D | spin_lock.c | diff 898f55f50a00f56dac1ef55f5478c10a7511d0a6 Tue Aug 08 11:27:55 CDT 2023 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> selftests/bpf: relax expected log messages to allow emitting BPF_ST
Update [1] to LLVM BPF backend seeks to enable generation of BPF_ST
instruction when CPUv4 is selected. This affects expected log messages
for the following selftests:
- log_fixup/missing_map
- spin_lock/lock_id_mapval_preserve
- spin_lock/lock_id_innermapval_preserve
Expected messages in these tests hard-code instruction numbers for BPF
programs compiled from C. These instruction numbers change when
BPF_ST is allowed because single BPF_ST instruction replaces a pair of
BPF_MOV/BPF_STX instructions, e.g.:
r1 = 42;
*(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = r1; ---> *(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = 42;
This commit updates expected log messages to avoid matching specific
instruction numbers (program position still could be uniquely
identified).
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D140804
"[BPF] support for BPF_ST instruction in codegen"
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230808162755.392606-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | log_fixup.c | diff 898f55f50a00f56dac1ef55f5478c10a7511d0a6 Tue Aug 08 11:27:55 CDT 2023 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> selftests/bpf: relax expected log messages to allow emitting BPF_ST
Update [1] to LLVM BPF backend seeks to enable generation of BPF_ST
instruction when CPUv4 is selected. This affects expected log messages
for the following selftests:
- log_fixup/missing_map
- spin_lock/lock_id_mapval_preserve
- spin_lock/lock_id_innermapval_preserve
Expected messages in these tests hard-code instruction numbers for BPF
programs compiled from C. These instruction numbers change when
BPF_ST is allowed because single BPF_ST instruction replaces a pair of
BPF_MOV/BPF_STX instructions, e.g.:
r1 = 42;
*(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = r1; ---> *(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = 42;
This commit updates expected log messages to avoid matching specific
instruction numbers (program position still could be uniquely
identified).
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D140804
"[BPF] support for BPF_ST instruction in codegen"
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230808162755.392606-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|