Searched hist:"891 cffbd6bcba26409869c19c07ecd4bfc0c2460" (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
/openbmc/linux/arch/x86/mm/ |
H A D | fault.c | diff 891cffbd6bcba26409869c19c07ecd4bfc0c2460 Sun Oct 12 15:16:12 CDT 2008 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> x86/mm: do not trigger a kernel warning if user-space disables interrupts and generates a page fault
Arjan reported a spike in the following bug pattern in v2.6.27:
http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=lock_page
which happens because hwclock started triggering warnings due to a (correct) might_sleep() check in the MM code.
The warning occurs because hwclock uses this dubious sequence of code to run "atomic" code:
static unsigned long atomic(const char *name, unsigned long (*op)(unsigned long), unsigned long arg) { unsigned long v; __asm__ volatile ("cli"); v = (*op)(arg); __asm__ volatile ("sti"); return v; }
Then it pagefaults in that "atomic" section, triggering the warning.
There is no way the kernel could provide "atomicity" in this path, a page fault is a cannot-continue machine event so the kernel has to wait for the page to be filled in.
Even if it was just a minor fault we'd have to take locks and might have to spend quite a bit of time with interrupts disabled - not nice to irq latencies in general.
So instead just enable interrupts in the pagefault path unconditionally if we come from user-space, and handle the fault.
Also, while touching this code, unify some trivial parts of the x86 VM paths at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reported-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|