Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:"79 d49ba048ecace59a9850e8a04b618d7848b8e7" (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/
H A Dtailcall5.c79d49ba048ecace59a9850e8a04b618d7848b8e7 Fri Nov 22 14:08:01 CST 2019 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases

Add several BPF kselftest cases for tail calls which test the various
patch directions, and that multiple locations are patched in same and
different programs.

# ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 tailcall_1:OK
#45/2 tailcall_2:OK
#45/3 tailcall_3:OK
#45/4 tailcall_4:OK
#45/5 tailcall_5:OK
#45 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/5 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

I've also verified the JITed dump after each of the rewrite cases that
it matches expectations.

Also regular test_verifier suite passes fine which contains further tail
call tests:

# ./test_verifier
[...]
Summary: 1563 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Checked under JIT, interpreter and JIT + hardening.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3d6cbecbeb171117dccfe153306e479798fb608d.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
H A Dtailcall4.c79d49ba048ecace59a9850e8a04b618d7848b8e7 Fri Nov 22 14:08:01 CST 2019 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases

Add several BPF kselftest cases for tail calls which test the various
patch directions, and that multiple locations are patched in same and
different programs.

# ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 tailcall_1:OK
#45/2 tailcall_2:OK
#45/3 tailcall_3:OK
#45/4 tailcall_4:OK
#45/5 tailcall_5:OK
#45 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/5 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

I've also verified the JITed dump after each of the rewrite cases that
it matches expectations.

Also regular test_verifier suite passes fine which contains further tail
call tests:

# ./test_verifier
[...]
Summary: 1563 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Checked under JIT, interpreter and JIT + hardening.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3d6cbecbeb171117dccfe153306e479798fb608d.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
H A Dtailcall1.c79d49ba048ecace59a9850e8a04b618d7848b8e7 Fri Nov 22 14:08:01 CST 2019 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases

Add several BPF kselftest cases for tail calls which test the various
patch directions, and that multiple locations are patched in same and
different programs.

# ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 tailcall_1:OK
#45/2 tailcall_2:OK
#45/3 tailcall_3:OK
#45/4 tailcall_4:OK
#45/5 tailcall_5:OK
#45 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/5 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

I've also verified the JITed dump after each of the rewrite cases that
it matches expectations.

Also regular test_verifier suite passes fine which contains further tail
call tests:

# ./test_verifier
[...]
Summary: 1563 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Checked under JIT, interpreter and JIT + hardening.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3d6cbecbeb171117dccfe153306e479798fb608d.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
H A Dtailcall2.c79d49ba048ecace59a9850e8a04b618d7848b8e7 Fri Nov 22 14:08:01 CST 2019 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases

Add several BPF kselftest cases for tail calls which test the various
patch directions, and that multiple locations are patched in same and
different programs.

# ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 tailcall_1:OK
#45/2 tailcall_2:OK
#45/3 tailcall_3:OK
#45/4 tailcall_4:OK
#45/5 tailcall_5:OK
#45 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/5 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

I've also verified the JITed dump after each of the rewrite cases that
it matches expectations.

Also regular test_verifier suite passes fine which contains further tail
call tests:

# ./test_verifier
[...]
Summary: 1563 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Checked under JIT, interpreter and JIT + hardening.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3d6cbecbeb171117dccfe153306e479798fb608d.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
H A Dtailcall3.c79d49ba048ecace59a9850e8a04b618d7848b8e7 Fri Nov 22 14:08:01 CST 2019 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases

Add several BPF kselftest cases for tail calls which test the various
patch directions, and that multiple locations are patched in same and
different programs.

# ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 tailcall_1:OK
#45/2 tailcall_2:OK
#45/3 tailcall_3:OK
#45/4 tailcall_4:OK
#45/5 tailcall_5:OK
#45 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/5 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

I've also verified the JITed dump after each of the rewrite cases that
it matches expectations.

Also regular test_verifier suite passes fine which contains further tail
call tests:

# ./test_verifier
[...]
Summary: 1563 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Checked under JIT, interpreter and JIT + hardening.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3d6cbecbeb171117dccfe153306e479798fb608d.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
/openbmc/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/
H A Dtailcalls.c79d49ba048ecace59a9850e8a04b618d7848b8e7 Fri Nov 22 14:08:01 CST 2019 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases

Add several BPF kselftest cases for tail calls which test the various
patch directions, and that multiple locations are patched in same and
different programs.

# ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 tailcall_1:OK
#45/2 tailcall_2:OK
#45/3 tailcall_3:OK
#45/4 tailcall_4:OK
#45/5 tailcall_5:OK
#45 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/5 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

I've also verified the JITed dump after each of the rewrite cases that
it matches expectations.

Also regular test_verifier suite passes fine which contains further tail
call tests:

# ./test_verifier
[...]
Summary: 1563 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Checked under JIT, interpreter and JIT + hardening.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3d6cbecbeb171117dccfe153306e479798fb608d.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net