Searched hist:"75 c096f753b273b59f1b9a0745e9e4b5d911a312" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/nfsd/ |
| H A D | nfs4proc.c | diff 75c096f753b273b59f1b9a0745e9e4b5d911a312 Mon Aug 15 17:39:32 CDT 2011 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfsd4: it's OK to return nfserr_symlink
The nfsd4 code has a bunch of special exceptions for error returns which
map nfserr_symlink to other errors.
In fact, the spec makes it clear that nfserr_symlink is to be preferred
over less specific errors where possible.
The patch that introduced it back in 2.6.4 is "kNFSd: correct symlink
related error returns.", which claims that these special exceptions are
represent an NFSv4 break from v2/v3 tradition--when in fact the symlink
error was introduced with v4.
I suspect what happened was pynfs tests were written that were overly
faithful to the (known-incomplete) rfc3530 error return lists, and then
code was fixed up mindlessly to make the tests pass.
Delete these unnecessary exceptions.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | nfs4xdr.c | diff 75c096f753b273b59f1b9a0745e9e4b5d911a312 Mon Aug 15 17:39:32 CDT 2011 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfsd4: it's OK to return nfserr_symlink
The nfsd4 code has a bunch of special exceptions for error returns which
map nfserr_symlink to other errors.
In fact, the spec makes it clear that nfserr_symlink is to be preferred
over less specific errors where possible.
The patch that introduced it back in 2.6.4 is "kNFSd: correct symlink
related error returns.", which claims that these special exceptions are
represent an NFSv4 break from v2/v3 tradition--when in fact the symlink
error was introduced with v4.
I suspect what happened was pynfs tests were written that were overly
faithful to the (known-incomplete) rfc3530 error return lists, and then
code was fixed up mindlessly to make the tests pass.
Delete these unnecessary exceptions.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | nfs4state.c | diff 75c096f753b273b59f1b9a0745e9e4b5d911a312 Mon Aug 15 17:39:32 CDT 2011 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfsd4: it's OK to return nfserr_symlink
The nfsd4 code has a bunch of special exceptions for error returns which
map nfserr_symlink to other errors.
In fact, the spec makes it clear that nfserr_symlink is to be preferred
over less specific errors where possible.
The patch that introduced it back in 2.6.4 is "kNFSd: correct symlink
related error returns.", which claims that these special exceptions are
represent an NFSv4 break from v2/v3 tradition--when in fact the symlink
error was introduced with v4.
I suspect what happened was pynfs tests were written that were overly
faithful to the (known-incomplete) rfc3530 error return lists, and then
code was fixed up mindlessly to make the tests pass.
Delete these unnecessary exceptions.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|