Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:"71 b7dec27f340c4ab90ef39ae096d8bb2e1c851c" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/net/mptcp/
H A Dpm.cdiff 71b7dec27f340c4ab90ef39ae096d8bb2e1c851c Fri Aug 13 17:15:42 CDT 2021 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> mptcp: less aggressive retransmission strategy

The current mptcp re-inject strategy is very aggressive,
we have mptcp-level retransmissions even on single subflow
connection, if the link in-use is lossy.

Let's be a little more conservative: we do retransmit
only if at least a subflow has write and rtx queue empty.

Additionally use the backup subflows only if the active
subflows are stale - no progresses in at least an rtx period
and ignore stale subflows for rtx timeout update

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/207
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
H A Dprotocol.hdiff 71b7dec27f340c4ab90ef39ae096d8bb2e1c851c Fri Aug 13 17:15:42 CDT 2021 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> mptcp: less aggressive retransmission strategy

The current mptcp re-inject strategy is very aggressive,
we have mptcp-level retransmissions even on single subflow
connection, if the link in-use is lossy.

Let's be a little more conservative: we do retransmit
only if at least a subflow has write and rtx queue empty.

Additionally use the backup subflows only if the active
subflows are stale - no progresses in at least an rtx period
and ignore stale subflows for rtx timeout update

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/207
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
H A Dprotocol.cdiff 71b7dec27f340c4ab90ef39ae096d8bb2e1c851c Fri Aug 13 17:15:42 CDT 2021 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> mptcp: less aggressive retransmission strategy

The current mptcp re-inject strategy is very aggressive,
we have mptcp-level retransmissions even on single subflow
connection, if the link in-use is lossy.

Let's be a little more conservative: we do retransmit
only if at least a subflow has write and rtx queue empty.

Additionally use the backup subflows only if the active
subflows are stale - no progresses in at least an rtx period
and ignore stale subflows for rtx timeout update

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/207
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>