Searched hist:"699489 bbbea4fc3b9b735d69941cf4fca91ce1d5" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/f2fs/ |
| H A D | dir.c | diff 699489bbbea4fc3b9b735d69941cf4fca91ce1d5 Fri Jun 07 08:08:23 CDT 2013 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> f2fs: sync dir->i_size with its block allocation
If new dentry block is allocated and its i_size is updated, we should update
its inode block together in order to sync i_size and its block allocation.
Otherwise, we can loose additional dentry block due to the unconsistent i_size.
Errorneous Scenario
-------------------
In the recovery routine,
- recovery_dentry
| - __f2fs_add_link
| | - get_new_data_page
| | | - i_size_write(new_i_size)
| | | - mark_inode_dirty_sync(dir)
| | - update_parent_metadata
| | | - mark_inode_dirty(dir)
|
- write_checkpoint
- sync_dirty_dir_inodes
- filemap_flush(dentry_blocks)
- f2fs_write_data_page
- skip to write the last dentry block due to index < i_size
In the above flow, new_i_size is not updated to its inode block so that the
last dentry block will be lost accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
|
| H A D | data.c | diff 699489bbbea4fc3b9b735d69941cf4fca91ce1d5 Fri Jun 07 08:08:23 CDT 2013 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> f2fs: sync dir->i_size with its block allocation
If new dentry block is allocated and its i_size is updated, we should update
its inode block together in order to sync i_size and its block allocation.
Otherwise, we can loose additional dentry block due to the unconsistent i_size.
Errorneous Scenario
-------------------
In the recovery routine,
- recovery_dentry
| - __f2fs_add_link
| | - get_new_data_page
| | | - i_size_write(new_i_size)
| | | - mark_inode_dirty_sync(dir)
| | - update_parent_metadata
| | | - mark_inode_dirty(dir)
|
- write_checkpoint
- sync_dirty_dir_inodes
- filemap_flush(dentry_blocks)
- f2fs_write_data_page
- skip to write the last dentry block due to index < i_size
In the above flow, new_i_size is not updated to its inode block so that the
last dentry block will be lost accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
|
| H A D | f2fs.h | diff 699489bbbea4fc3b9b735d69941cf4fca91ce1d5 Fri Jun 07 08:08:23 CDT 2013 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> f2fs: sync dir->i_size with its block allocation
If new dentry block is allocated and its i_size is updated, we should update
its inode block together in order to sync i_size and its block allocation.
Otherwise, we can loose additional dentry block due to the unconsistent i_size.
Errorneous Scenario
-------------------
In the recovery routine,
- recovery_dentry
| - __f2fs_add_link
| | - get_new_data_page
| | | - i_size_write(new_i_size)
| | | - mark_inode_dirty_sync(dir)
| | - update_parent_metadata
| | | - mark_inode_dirty(dir)
|
- write_checkpoint
- sync_dirty_dir_inodes
- filemap_flush(dentry_blocks)
- f2fs_write_data_page
- skip to write the last dentry block due to index < i_size
In the above flow, new_i_size is not updated to its inode block so that the
last dentry block will be lost accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
|