Searched hist:"63 f9909ff602082597849f684655e93336c50b11" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/uapi/linux/ |
| H A D | fuse.h | diff 63f9909ff602082597849f684655e93336c50b11 Fri Oct 09 13:15:07 CDT 2020 Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> fuse: introduce the notion of FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2
We already have FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV flag that says that file server will
remove suid/sgid/caps on truncate/chown/write. But that's little different
from what Linux VFS implements.
To be consistent with Linux VFS behavior what we want is.
- caps are always cleared on chown/write/truncate
- suid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID.
- sgid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID as well as file has group execute
permission.
As previous flag did not provide above semantics. Implement a V2 of the
protocol with above said constraints.
Server does not know if caller has CAP_FSETID or not. So for the case
of write()/truncate(), client will send information in special flag to
indicate whether to kill priviliges or not. These changes are in subsequent
patches.
FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 relies on WRITE being sent to server to clear
suid/sgid/security.capability. But with ->writeback_cache, WRITES are
cached in guest. So it is not recommended to use FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2
and writeback_cache together. Though it probably might be good enough
for lot of use cases.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/fuse/ |
| H A D | fuse_i.h | diff 63f9909ff602082597849f684655e93336c50b11 Fri Oct 09 13:15:07 CDT 2020 Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> fuse: introduce the notion of FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2
We already have FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV flag that says that file server will
remove suid/sgid/caps on truncate/chown/write. But that's little different
from what Linux VFS implements.
To be consistent with Linux VFS behavior what we want is.
- caps are always cleared on chown/write/truncate
- suid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID.
- sgid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID as well as file has group execute
permission.
As previous flag did not provide above semantics. Implement a V2 of the
protocol with above said constraints.
Server does not know if caller has CAP_FSETID or not. So for the case
of write()/truncate(), client will send information in special flag to
indicate whether to kill priviliges or not. These changes are in subsequent
patches.
FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 relies on WRITE being sent to server to clear
suid/sgid/security.capability. But with ->writeback_cache, WRITES are
cached in guest. So it is not recommended to use FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2
and writeback_cache together. Though it probably might be good enough
for lot of use cases.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | inode.c | diff 63f9909ff602082597849f684655e93336c50b11 Fri Oct 09 13:15:07 CDT 2020 Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> fuse: introduce the notion of FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2
We already have FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV flag that says that file server will
remove suid/sgid/caps on truncate/chown/write. But that's little different
from what Linux VFS implements.
To be consistent with Linux VFS behavior what we want is.
- caps are always cleared on chown/write/truncate
- suid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID.
- sgid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID as well as file has group execute
permission.
As previous flag did not provide above semantics. Implement a V2 of the
protocol with above said constraints.
Server does not know if caller has CAP_FSETID or not. So for the case
of write()/truncate(), client will send information in special flag to
indicate whether to kill priviliges or not. These changes are in subsequent
patches.
FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 relies on WRITE being sent to server to clear
suid/sgid/security.capability. But with ->writeback_cache, WRITES are
cached in guest. So it is not recommended to use FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2
and writeback_cache together. Though it probably might be good enough
for lot of use cases.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
|