Searched hist:"6374 e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e" (Results 1 – 10 of 10) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | ordered-data.h | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | dev-replace.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | ordered-data.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | qgroup.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | relocation.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | scrub.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | super.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | transaction.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | ioctl.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | extent-tree.c | diff 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e Fri Jun 23 11:48:21 CDT 2017 Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|