Searched hist:"632 eaeab1feb5d78c1e2bfb1d2dfc0ebb8ac187f" (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/ext4/ |
| H A D | inode.c | diff 632eaeab1feb5d78c1e2bfb1d2dfc0ebb8ac187f Fri Jul 11 18:27:31 CDT 2008 Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> ext4: fix delalloc i_disksize early update issue
Ext4_da_write_end() used walk_page_buffers() with a callback function of
ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to check if it extended the file size
without allocating any blocks (since in this case i_disksize needs to be
updated). However, this is didn't work proprely because the buffer head
has not been marked dirty yet --- this is done later in
block_commit_write() --- which caused ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to
always return false.
In addition, walk_page_buffers() checks all of the buffer heads covering
the page, and the only buffer_head that should be checked is the one
covering the end of the write. Otherwise, given a 1k blocksize
filesystem and a 4k page size, the buffer head covering the first 1k
stripe of the file could be unmapped (because it was a sparse file), and
the second or third buffer_head covering that page could be mapped, and
using walk_page_buffers() would fail in this case since it would stop at
the first unmapped buffer_head and return true.
The core problem is that walk_page_buffers() was intended to do work in
a callback function, and a non-zero return value indicated a failure,
which termined the walk of the buffer heads covering the page. It was
not intended to be used with a boolean function, such as
ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay().
Add addtional fix from Aneesh to protect i_disksize update rave with truncate.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
|