Searched hist:"5 b3639371c3e220b41cd2eae8c34c49ad38ef527" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/qemu/block/ |
| H A D | vvfat.c | diff 5b3639371c3e220b41cd2eae8c34c49ad38ef527 Tue May 17 09:41:31 CDT 2016 Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> block: Make bdrv_open() return a BDS
There are no callers to bdrv_open() or bdrv_open_inherit() left that
pass a pointer to a non-NULL BDS pointer as the first argument of these
functions, so we can finally drop that parameter and just make them
return the new BDS.
Generally, the following pattern is applied:
bs = NULL;
ret = bdrv_open(&bs, ..., &local_err);
if (ret < 0) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
...
}
by
bs = bdrv_open(..., errp);
if (!bs) {
ret = -EINVAL;
...
}
Of course, there are only a few instances where the pattern is really
pure.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | block-backend.c | diff 5b3639371c3e220b41cd2eae8c34c49ad38ef527 Tue May 17 09:41:31 CDT 2016 Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> block: Make bdrv_open() return a BDS
There are no callers to bdrv_open() or bdrv_open_inherit() left that
pass a pointer to a non-NULL BDS pointer as the first argument of these
functions, so we can finally drop that parameter and just make them
return the new BDS.
Generally, the following pattern is applied:
bs = NULL;
ret = bdrv_open(&bs, ..., &local_err);
if (ret < 0) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
...
}
by
bs = bdrv_open(..., errp);
if (!bs) {
ret = -EINVAL;
...
}
Of course, there are only a few instances where the pattern is really
pure.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/qemu/include/block/ |
| H A D | block.h | diff 5b3639371c3e220b41cd2eae8c34c49ad38ef527 Tue May 17 09:41:31 CDT 2016 Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> block: Make bdrv_open() return a BDS
There are no callers to bdrv_open() or bdrv_open_inherit() left that
pass a pointer to a non-NULL BDS pointer as the first argument of these
functions, so we can finally drop that parameter and just make them
return the new BDS.
Generally, the following pattern is applied:
bs = NULL;
ret = bdrv_open(&bs, ..., &local_err);
if (ret < 0) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
...
}
by
bs = bdrv_open(..., errp);
if (!bs) {
ret = -EINVAL;
...
}
Of course, there are only a few instances where the pattern is really
pure.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/qemu/ |
| H A D | blockdev.c | diff 5b3639371c3e220b41cd2eae8c34c49ad38ef527 Tue May 17 09:41:31 CDT 2016 Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> block: Make bdrv_open() return a BDS
There are no callers to bdrv_open() or bdrv_open_inherit() left that
pass a pointer to a non-NULL BDS pointer as the first argument of these
functions, so we can finally drop that parameter and just make them
return the new BDS.
Generally, the following pattern is applied:
bs = NULL;
ret = bdrv_open(&bs, ..., &local_err);
if (ret < 0) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
...
}
by
bs = bdrv_open(..., errp);
if (!bs) {
ret = -EINVAL;
...
}
Of course, there are only a few instances where the pattern is really
pure.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | block.c | diff 5b3639371c3e220b41cd2eae8c34c49ad38ef527 Tue May 17 09:41:31 CDT 2016 Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> block: Make bdrv_open() return a BDS
There are no callers to bdrv_open() or bdrv_open_inherit() left that
pass a pointer to a non-NULL BDS pointer as the first argument of these
functions, so we can finally drop that parameter and just make them
return the new BDS.
Generally, the following pattern is applied:
bs = NULL;
ret = bdrv_open(&bs, ..., &local_err);
if (ret < 0) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
...
}
by
bs = bdrv_open(..., errp);
if (!bs) {
ret = -EINVAL;
...
}
Of course, there are only a few instances where the pattern is really
pure.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|