Searched hist:"4 ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b" (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/xen/ |
| H A D | suspend.c | diff 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b Wed Mar 25 07:09:16 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/kernel/time/ |
| H A D | tick-internal.h | diff 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b Wed Mar 25 07:09:16 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | clockevents.c | diff 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b Wed Mar 25 07:09:16 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | tick-common.c | diff 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b Wed Mar 25 07:09:16 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | timekeeping.c | diff 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b Wed Mar 25 07:09:16 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | clockchips.h | diff 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b Wed Mar 25 07:09:16 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | tick.h | diff 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b Wed Mar 25 07:09:16 CDT 2015 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|