Searched hist:"4 b98d11b40f03382918796f3c5c936d5495d20a4" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/ |
| H A D | read_write.c | diff 4b98d11b40f03382918796f3c5c936d5495d20a4 Sat Feb 10 03:46:45 CST 2007 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> [PATCH] ifdef ->rchar, ->wchar, ->syscr, ->syscw from task_struct
They are fat: 4x8 bytes in task_struct.
They are uncoditionally updated in every fork, read, write and sendfile.
They are used only if you have some "extended acct fields feature".
And please, please, please, read(2) knows about bytes, not characters,
why it is called "rchar"?
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/proc/ |
| H A D | base.c | diff 4b98d11b40f03382918796f3c5c936d5495d20a4 Sat Feb 10 03:46:45 CST 2007 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> [PATCH] ifdef ->rchar, ->wchar, ->syscr, ->syscw from task_struct
They are fat: 4x8 bytes in task_struct.
They are uncoditionally updated in every fork, read, write and sendfile.
They are used only if you have some "extended acct fields feature".
And please, please, please, read(2) knows about bytes, not characters,
why it is called "rchar"?
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/kernel/ |
| H A D | fork.c | diff 4b98d11b40f03382918796f3c5c936d5495d20a4 Sat Feb 10 03:46:45 CST 2007 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> [PATCH] ifdef ->rchar, ->wchar, ->syscr, ->syscw from task_struct
They are fat: 4x8 bytes in task_struct.
They are uncoditionally updated in every fork, read, write and sendfile.
They are used only if you have some "extended acct fields feature".
And please, please, please, read(2) knows about bytes, not characters,
why it is called "rchar"?
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | sched.h | diff 4b98d11b40f03382918796f3c5c936d5495d20a4 Sat Feb 10 03:46:45 CST 2007 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> [PATCH] ifdef ->rchar, ->wchar, ->syscr, ->syscw from task_struct
They are fat: 4x8 bytes in task_struct.
They are uncoditionally updated in every fork, read, write and sendfile.
They are used only if you have some "extended acct fields feature".
And please, please, please, read(2) knows about bytes, not characters,
why it is called "rchar"?
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|