Searched hist:"4 b47c0b81ffd9b395b5afc3ef41c69cceb6a8576" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/ |
| H A D | enetc_vf.c | diff 4b47c0b81ffd9b395b5afc3ef41c69cceb6a8576 Wed Mar 10 06:03:46 CST 2021 Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> net: enetc: don't initialize unused ports from a separate code path
Since commit 3222b5b613db ("net: enetc: initialize RFS/RSS memories for
unused ports too") there is a requirement to initialize the memories of
unused PFs too, which has left the probe path in a bit of a rough shape,
because we basically have a minimal initialization path for unused PFs
which is separate from the main initialization path.
Now that initializing a control BD ring is as simple as calling
enetc_setup_cbdr, let's move that outside of enetc_alloc_si_resources
(unused PFs don't need classification rules, so no point in allocating
them just to free them later).
But enetc_alloc_si_resources is called both for PFs and for VFs, so now
that enetc_setup_cbdr is no longer called from this common function, it
means that the VF probe path needs to explicitly call enetc_setup_cbdr
too.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | enetc_pf.c | diff 4b47c0b81ffd9b395b5afc3ef41c69cceb6a8576 Wed Mar 10 06:03:46 CST 2021 Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> net: enetc: don't initialize unused ports from a separate code path
Since commit 3222b5b613db ("net: enetc: initialize RFS/RSS memories for
unused ports too") there is a requirement to initialize the memories of
unused PFs too, which has left the probe path in a bit of a rough shape,
because we basically have a minimal initialization path for unused PFs
which is separate from the main initialization path.
Now that initializing a control BD ring is as simple as calling
enetc_setup_cbdr, let's move that outside of enetc_alloc_si_resources
(unused PFs don't need classification rules, so no point in allocating
them just to free them later).
But enetc_alloc_si_resources is called both for PFs and for VFs, so now
that enetc_setup_cbdr is no longer called from this common function, it
means that the VF probe path needs to explicitly call enetc_setup_cbdr
too.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | enetc.c | diff 4b47c0b81ffd9b395b5afc3ef41c69cceb6a8576 Wed Mar 10 06:03:46 CST 2021 Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> net: enetc: don't initialize unused ports from a separate code path
Since commit 3222b5b613db ("net: enetc: initialize RFS/RSS memories for
unused ports too") there is a requirement to initialize the memories of
unused PFs too, which has left the probe path in a bit of a rough shape,
because we basically have a minimal initialization path for unused PFs
which is separate from the main initialization path.
Now that initializing a control BD ring is as simple as calling
enetc_setup_cbdr, let's move that outside of enetc_alloc_si_resources
(unused PFs don't need classification rules, so no point in allocating
them just to free them later).
But enetc_alloc_si_resources is called both for PFs and for VFs, so now
that enetc_setup_cbdr is no longer called from this common function, it
means that the VF probe path needs to explicitly call enetc_setup_cbdr
too.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|