| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/entry/ |
| H A D | syscall_x32.c | diff 44fe4895f47cbe9f4692e1d3cdc2ef8352f4d88e Mon May 17 02:38:11 CDT 2021 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> x86/syscalls: Stop filling syscall arrays with *_sys_ni_syscall
This is a follow-up cleanup after switching to the generic syscalltbl.sh.
The old x86 specific script skipped non-existing syscalls. So, the
generated syscalls_64.h, for example, had a big hole in the syscall numbers
335-423 range. That is why there exists [0 ... __NR_*_syscall_max] =
&__*_sys_ni_cyscall.
The new script, scripts/syscalltbl.sh automatically fills holes
with __SYSCALL(<nr>, sys_ni_syscall), hence such ugly code can
go away. The designated initializers, '[nr] =' are also unneeded.
Also, there is no need to give __NR_*_syscall_max+1 because the array
size is implied by the number of syscalls in the generated headers.
Hence, there is no need to include <asm/unistd.h>, either.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517073815.97426-4-masahiroy@kernel.org
|
| H A D | syscall_32.c | diff 44fe4895f47cbe9f4692e1d3cdc2ef8352f4d88e Mon May 17 02:38:11 CDT 2021 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> x86/syscalls: Stop filling syscall arrays with *_sys_ni_syscall
This is a follow-up cleanup after switching to the generic syscalltbl.sh.
The old x86 specific script skipped non-existing syscalls. So, the
generated syscalls_64.h, for example, had a big hole in the syscall numbers
335-423 range. That is why there exists [0 ... __NR_*_syscall_max] =
&__*_sys_ni_cyscall.
The new script, scripts/syscalltbl.sh automatically fills holes
with __SYSCALL(<nr>, sys_ni_syscall), hence such ugly code can
go away. The designated initializers, '[nr] =' are also unneeded.
Also, there is no need to give __NR_*_syscall_max+1 because the array
size is implied by the number of syscalls in the generated headers.
Hence, there is no need to include <asm/unistd.h>, either.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517073815.97426-4-masahiroy@kernel.org
|
| H A D | syscall_64.c | diff 44fe4895f47cbe9f4692e1d3cdc2ef8352f4d88e Mon May 17 02:38:11 CDT 2021 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> x86/syscalls: Stop filling syscall arrays with *_sys_ni_syscall
This is a follow-up cleanup after switching to the generic syscalltbl.sh.
The old x86 specific script skipped non-existing syscalls. So, the
generated syscalls_64.h, for example, had a big hole in the syscall numbers
335-423 range. That is why there exists [0 ... __NR_*_syscall_max] =
&__*_sys_ni_cyscall.
The new script, scripts/syscalltbl.sh automatically fills holes
with __SYSCALL(<nr>, sys_ni_syscall), hence such ugly code can
go away. The designated initializers, '[nr] =' are also unneeded.
Also, there is no need to give __NR_*_syscall_max+1 because the array
size is implied by the number of syscalls in the generated headers.
Hence, there is no need to include <asm/unistd.h>, either.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517073815.97426-4-masahiroy@kernel.org
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/um/ |
| H A D | sys_call_table_64.c | diff 44fe4895f47cbe9f4692e1d3cdc2ef8352f4d88e Mon May 17 02:38:11 CDT 2021 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> x86/syscalls: Stop filling syscall arrays with *_sys_ni_syscall
This is a follow-up cleanup after switching to the generic syscalltbl.sh.
The old x86 specific script skipped non-existing syscalls. So, the
generated syscalls_64.h, for example, had a big hole in the syscall numbers
335-423 range. That is why there exists [0 ... __NR_*_syscall_max] =
&__*_sys_ni_cyscall.
The new script, scripts/syscalltbl.sh automatically fills holes
with __SYSCALL(<nr>, sys_ni_syscall), hence such ugly code can
go away. The designated initializers, '[nr] =' are also unneeded.
Also, there is no need to give __NR_*_syscall_max+1 because the array
size is implied by the number of syscalls in the generated headers.
Hence, there is no need to include <asm/unistd.h>, either.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517073815.97426-4-masahiroy@kernel.org
|
| H A D | sys_call_table_32.c | diff 44fe4895f47cbe9f4692e1d3cdc2ef8352f4d88e Mon May 17 02:38:11 CDT 2021 Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> x86/syscalls: Stop filling syscall arrays with *_sys_ni_syscall
This is a follow-up cleanup after switching to the generic syscalltbl.sh.
The old x86 specific script skipped non-existing syscalls. So, the
generated syscalls_64.h, for example, had a big hole in the syscall numbers
335-423 range. That is why there exists [0 ... __NR_*_syscall_max] =
&__*_sys_ni_cyscall.
The new script, scripts/syscalltbl.sh automatically fills holes
with __SYSCALL(<nr>, sys_ni_syscall), hence such ugly code can
go away. The designated initializers, '[nr] =' are also unneeded.
Also, there is no need to give __NR_*_syscall_max+1 because the array
size is implied by the number of syscalls in the generated headers.
Hence, there is no need to include <asm/unistd.h>, either.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517073815.97426-4-masahiroy@kernel.org
|