Searched hist:"4196 d2f0308cb1ae13ed450424ab7dfe154acda9" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/qemu/include/block/ |
| H A D | block.h | diff 4196d2f0308cb1ae13ed450424ab7dfe154acda9 Tue May 12 09:30:55 CDT 2015 Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> block: minimal bounce buffer alignment
The patch introduces new concept: minimal memory alignment for bounce
buffers. Original so called "optimal" value is actually minimal required
value for aligment. It should be used for validation that the IOVec
is properly aligned and bounce buffer is not required.
Though, from the performance point of view, it would be better if
bounce buffer or IOVec allocated by QEMU will be aligned stricter.
The patch does not change any alignment value yet.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1431441056-26198-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | block_int.h | diff 4196d2f0308cb1ae13ed450424ab7dfe154acda9 Tue May 12 09:30:55 CDT 2015 Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> block: minimal bounce buffer alignment
The patch introduces new concept: minimal memory alignment for bounce
buffers. Original so called "optimal" value is actually minimal required
value for aligment. It should be used for validation that the IOVec
is properly aligned and bounce buffer is not required.
Though, from the performance point of view, it would be better if
bounce buffer or IOVec allocated by QEMU will be aligned stricter.
The patch does not change any alignment value yet.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1431441056-26198-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/qemu/block/ |
| H A D | io.c | diff 4196d2f0308cb1ae13ed450424ab7dfe154acda9 Tue May 12 09:30:55 CDT 2015 Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> block: minimal bounce buffer alignment
The patch introduces new concept: minimal memory alignment for bounce
buffers. Original so called "optimal" value is actually minimal required
value for aligment. It should be used for validation that the IOVec
is properly aligned and bounce buffer is not required.
Though, from the performance point of view, it would be better if
bounce buffer or IOVec allocated by QEMU will be aligned stricter.
The patch does not change any alignment value yet.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1431441056-26198-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/qemu/ |
| H A D | block.c | diff 4196d2f0308cb1ae13ed450424ab7dfe154acda9 Tue May 12 09:30:55 CDT 2015 Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> block: minimal bounce buffer alignment
The patch introduces new concept: minimal memory alignment for bounce
buffers. Original so called "optimal" value is actually minimal required
value for aligment. It should be used for validation that the IOVec
is properly aligned and bounce buffer is not required.
Though, from the performance point of view, it would be better if
bounce buffer or IOVec allocated by QEMU will be aligned stricter.
The patch does not change any alignment value yet.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1431441056-26198-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
|