/openbmc/linux/crypto/ |
H A D | md4.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | khazad.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | anubis.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | fcrypt.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | tea.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | lzo.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | md5.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | wp512.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | deflate.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | des_generic.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | crypto_null.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | sha1_generic.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | sha256_generic.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | sha512_generic.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
H A D | tcrypt.c | diff 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053 Sat Apr 05 08:00:57 CDT 2008 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|