Searched hist:"307261 b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355" (Results 1 – 9 of 9) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/qemu/block/ |
| H A D | vhdx-log.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | qcow2-snapshot.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | snapshot.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | qapi.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | commit.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | block-backend.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | io.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | qcow2.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/qemu/ |
| H A D | block.c | diff 307261b243df2edde538f3ed5c9d80e168529355 Thu May 27 10:40:54 CDT 2021 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> block: consistently use bdrv_is_read_only()
It's better to use accessor function instead of bs->read_only directly.
In some places use bdrv_is_writable() instead of
checking both BDRV_O_RDWR set and BDRV_O_INACTIVE not set.
In bdrv_open_common() it's a bit strange to add one more variable, but
we are going to drop bs->read_only in the next patch, so new ro local
variable substitutes it here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|