Searched hist:"2 f7d2fb71dd0c14f9c0fe66f2ed7b4685fa745e2" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/ |
H A D | crossbar.txt | diff 2f7d2fb71dd0c14f9c0fe66f2ed7b4685fa745e2 Thu Jun 26 02:10:31 CDT 2014 Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> irqchip: crossbar: Introduce ti, max-crossbar-sources to identify valid crossbar mapping
Currently we attempt to map any crossbar value to an IRQ, however, this is not correct from hardware perspective. There is a max crossbar event number upto which hardware supports. So describe the same in device tree using 'ti,max-crossbar-sources' property and use it to validate requests.
[ jac - remove MAX_SOURCES from binding doc, use integer because we shouldn't put implementation details in the binding docs ]
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1403766634-18543-14-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/irqchip/ |
H A D | irq-crossbar.c | diff 2f7d2fb71dd0c14f9c0fe66f2ed7b4685fa745e2 Thu Jun 26 02:10:31 CDT 2014 Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> irqchip: crossbar: Introduce ti, max-crossbar-sources to identify valid crossbar mapping
Currently we attempt to map any crossbar value to an IRQ, however, this is not correct from hardware perspective. There is a max crossbar event number upto which hardware supports. So describe the same in device tree using 'ti,max-crossbar-sources' property and use it to validate requests.
[ jac - remove MAX_SOURCES from binding doc, use integer because we shouldn't put implementation details in the binding docs ]
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1403766634-18543-14-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
|