Searched hist:"1 b5a433a4dd967b125131da42b89b5cc0d5b1f57" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ |
| H A D | i915_gem.c | diff 832a3aad1e2927b1684e7369c9f36a370e0b95da Wed Mar 18 13:19:22 CDT 2015 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Keep ring->active_list and ring->requests_list consistent
If we retire requests last, we may use a later seqno and so clear
the requests lists without clearing the active list, leading to
confusion. Hence we should retire requests first for consistency with
the early return. The order used to be important as the lifecycle for
the object on the active list was determined by request->seqno. However,
the requests themselves are now reference counted removing the
constraint from the order of retirement.
Fixes regression from
commit 1b5a433a4dd967b125131da42b89b5cc0d5b1f57
Author: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Date: Mon Nov 24 18:49:42 2014 +0000
drm/i915: Convert 'i915_seqno_passed' calls into 'i915_gem_request_completed
'
and a
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1383 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c:279 i915_gem_evict_vm+0x10c/0x140()
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&vm->active_list))
Identified by updating WATCH_LISTS:
[drm:i915_verify_lists] *ERROR* blitter ring: active list not empty, but no requests
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 681 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2751 i915_gem_retire_requests_ring+0x149/0x230()
WARN_ON(i915_verify_lists(ring->dev))
Note that this is only a problem in evict_vm where the following happens
after a retire_request has cleaned out all requests, but not all active
bo:
- intel_ring_idle called from i915_gpu_idle notices that no requests are
outstanding and immediately returns.
- i915_gem_retire_requests_ring called from i915_gem_retire_requests also
immediately returns when there's no request, still leaving the bo on the
active list.
- evict_vm hits the WARN_ON(!list_empty(&vm->active_list)) after evicting
all active objects that there's still stuff left that shouldn't be
there.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
diff 1b5a433a4dd967b125131da42b89b5cc0d5b1f57 Mon Nov 24 12:49:42 CST 2014 John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> drm/i915: Convert 'i915_seqno_passed' calls into 'i915_gem_request_completed'
Almost everywhere that caled i915_seqno_passed() was really asking 'has the
given seqno popped out of the hardware yet?'. Thus it had to query the current
hardware seqno and then do a signed delta comparison (which copes with wrapping
around zero but not with seqno values more than 2GB apart, although the latter
is unlikely!).
Now that the majority of seqno instances have been replaced with request
structures, it is possible to convert this test to be request based as well.
There is now a 'i915_gem_request_completed()' function which takes a request and
returns true or false as appropriate. Note that this currently just wraps up the
original _passed() test but a later patch in the series will reduce this to
simply returning a cached internal value, i.e.:
_completed(req) { return req->completed; }'
This checkin converts almost all _seqno_passed() calls. The only one left is in
the semaphore code which still requires seqnos not request structures.
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop hunk touching the trace_irq code since I've dropped the
patch which converts that, and resolve resulting conflict.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| H A D | i915_debugfs.c | diff 1b5a433a4dd967b125131da42b89b5cc0d5b1f57 Mon Nov 24 12:49:42 CST 2014 John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> drm/i915: Convert 'i915_seqno_passed' calls into 'i915_gem_request_completed'
Almost everywhere that caled i915_seqno_passed() was really asking 'has the
given seqno popped out of the hardware yet?'. Thus it had to query the current
hardware seqno and then do a signed delta comparison (which copes with wrapping
around zero but not with seqno values more than 2GB apart, although the latter
is unlikely!).
Now that the majority of seqno instances have been replaced with request
structures, it is possible to convert this test to be request based as well.
There is now a 'i915_gem_request_completed()' function which takes a request and
returns true or false as appropriate. Note that this currently just wraps up the
original _passed() test but a later patch in the series will reduce this to
simply returning a cached internal value, i.e.:
_completed(req) { return req->completed; }'
This checkin converts almost all _seqno_passed() calls. The only one left is in
the semaphore code which still requires seqnos not request structures.
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop hunk touching the trace_irq code since I've dropped the
patch which converts that, and resolve resulting conflict.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| H A D | i915_irq.c | diff 1b5a433a4dd967b125131da42b89b5cc0d5b1f57 Mon Nov 24 12:49:42 CST 2014 John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> drm/i915: Convert 'i915_seqno_passed' calls into 'i915_gem_request_completed'
Almost everywhere that caled i915_seqno_passed() was really asking 'has the
given seqno popped out of the hardware yet?'. Thus it had to query the current
hardware seqno and then do a signed delta comparison (which copes with wrapping
around zero but not with seqno values more than 2GB apart, although the latter
is unlikely!).
Now that the majority of seqno instances have been replaced with request
structures, it is possible to convert this test to be request based as well.
There is now a 'i915_gem_request_completed()' function which takes a request and
returns true or false as appropriate. Note that this currently just wraps up the
original _passed() test but a later patch in the series will reduce this to
simply returning a cached internal value, i.e.:
_completed(req) { return req->completed; }'
This checkin converts almost all _seqno_passed() calls. The only one left is in
the semaphore code which still requires seqnos not request structures.
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop hunk touching the trace_irq code since I've dropped the
patch which converts that, and resolve resulting conflict.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| H A D | i915_drv.h | diff 1b5a433a4dd967b125131da42b89b5cc0d5b1f57 Mon Nov 24 12:49:42 CST 2014 John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> drm/i915: Convert 'i915_seqno_passed' calls into 'i915_gem_request_completed'
Almost everywhere that caled i915_seqno_passed() was really asking 'has the
given seqno popped out of the hardware yet?'. Thus it had to query the current
hardware seqno and then do a signed delta comparison (which copes with wrapping
around zero but not with seqno values more than 2GB apart, although the latter
is unlikely!).
Now that the majority of seqno instances have been replaced with request
structures, it is possible to convert this test to be request based as well.
There is now a 'i915_gem_request_completed()' function which takes a request and
returns true or false as appropriate. Note that this currently just wraps up the
original _passed() test but a later patch in the series will reduce this to
simply returning a cached internal value, i.e.:
_completed(req) { return req->completed; }'
This checkin converts almost all _seqno_passed() calls. The only one left is in
the semaphore code which still requires seqnos not request structures.
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop hunk touching the trace_irq code since I've dropped the
patch which converts that, and resolve resulting conflict.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|