Searched hist:"1 a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a" (Results 1 – 8 of 8) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/net/sched/ |
| H A D | act_nat.c | diff 1a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a Mon Dec 23 07:02:11 CST 2013 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace
This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
filters, new actions and replacing of action
attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:
XXXX
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 1 bind 0
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX
The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | act_gact.c | diff 1a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a Mon Dec 23 07:02:11 CST 2013 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace
This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
filters, new actions and replacing of action
attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:
XXXX
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 1 bind 0
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX
The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | act_skbedit.c | diff 1a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a Mon Dec 23 07:02:11 CST 2013 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace
This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
filters, new actions and replacing of action
attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:
XXXX
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 1 bind 0
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX
The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | act_simple.c | diff 1a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a Mon Dec 23 07:02:11 CST 2013 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace
This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
filters, new actions and replacing of action
attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:
XXXX
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 1 bind 0
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX
The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | act_ipt.c | diff 1a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a Mon Dec 23 07:02:11 CST 2013 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace
This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
filters, new actions and replacing of action
attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:
XXXX
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 1 bind 0
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX
The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | act_csum.c | diff 1a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a Mon Dec 23 07:02:11 CST 2013 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace
This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
filters, new actions and replacing of action
attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:
XXXX
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 1 bind 0
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX
The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | act_police.c | diff 1a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a Mon Dec 23 07:02:11 CST 2013 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace
This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
filters, new actions and replacing of action
attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:
XXXX
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 1 bind 0
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX
The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | act_pedit.c | diff 1a29321ed045e3aad23c5f7b63036e465ee3093a Mon Dec 23 07:02:11 CST 2013 Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace
This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
filters, new actions and replacing of action
attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:
XXXX
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 1 bind 0
moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
action order 1: gact action drop
random type none pass val 0
index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX
The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|