Searched hist:"08 c8e685c7c9223f9c4ad6365e02bebd3f106480" (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/s390/include/asm/ |
| H A D | ptdump.h | 08c8e685c7c9223f9c4ad6365e02bebd3f106480 Wed Sep 09 10:10:29 CDT 2020 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> s390: add ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_WX support
Checks the whole kernel address space for W+X mappings. Note that
currently the first lowcore page unfortunately has to be mapped
W+X. Therefore this not reported as an insecure mapping.
For the very same reason the wording is also different to other
architectures if the test passes:
On s390 it is "no unexpected W+X pages found" instead of
"no W+X pages found".
Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/s390/mm/ |
| H A D | Makefile | diff 08c8e685c7c9223f9c4ad6365e02bebd3f106480 Wed Sep 09 10:10:29 CDT 2020 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> s390: add ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_WX support
Checks the whole kernel address space for W+X mappings. Note that
currently the first lowcore page unfortunately has to be mapped
W+X. Therefore this not reported as an insecure mapping.
For the very same reason the wording is also different to other
architectures if the test passes:
On s390 it is "no unexpected W+X pages found" instead of
"no W+X pages found".
Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
| H A D | dump_pagetables.c | diff 08c8e685c7c9223f9c4ad6365e02bebd3f106480 Wed Sep 09 10:10:29 CDT 2020 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> s390: add ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_WX support
Checks the whole kernel address space for W+X mappings. Note that
currently the first lowcore page unfortunately has to be mapped
W+X. Therefore this not reported as an insecure mapping.
For the very same reason the wording is also different to other
architectures if the test passes:
On s390 it is "no unexpected W+X pages found" instead of
"no W+X pages found".
Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
| H A D | init.c | diff 08c8e685c7c9223f9c4ad6365e02bebd3f106480 Wed Sep 09 10:10:29 CDT 2020 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> s390: add ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_WX support
Checks the whole kernel address space for W+X mappings. Note that
currently the first lowcore page unfortunately has to be mapped
W+X. Therefore this not reported as an insecure mapping.
For the very same reason the wording is also different to other
architectures if the test passes:
On s390 it is "no unexpected W+X pages found" instead of
"no W+X pages found".
Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/s390/configs/ |
| H A D | defconfig | diff 08c8e685c7c9223f9c4ad6365e02bebd3f106480 Wed Sep 09 10:10:29 CDT 2020 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> s390: add ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_WX support
Checks the whole kernel address space for W+X mappings. Note that
currently the first lowcore page unfortunately has to be mapped
W+X. Therefore this not reported as an insecure mapping.
For the very same reason the wording is also different to other
architectures if the test passes:
On s390 it is "no unexpected W+X pages found" instead of
"no W+X pages found".
Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
| H A D | debug_defconfig | diff 08c8e685c7c9223f9c4ad6365e02bebd3f106480 Wed Sep 09 10:10:29 CDT 2020 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> s390: add ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_WX support
Checks the whole kernel address space for W+X mappings. Note that
currently the first lowcore page unfortunately has to be mapped
W+X. Therefore this not reported as an insecure mapping.
For the very same reason the wording is also different to other
architectures if the test passes:
On s390 it is "no unexpected W+X pages found" instead of
"no W+X pages found".
Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/s390/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | diff 08c8e685c7c9223f9c4ad6365e02bebd3f106480 Wed Sep 09 10:10:29 CDT 2020 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> s390: add ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_WX support
Checks the whole kernel address space for W+X mappings. Note that
currently the first lowcore page unfortunately has to be mapped
W+X. Therefore this not reported as an insecure mapping.
For the very same reason the wording is also different to other
architectures if the test passes:
On s390 it is "no unexpected W+X pages found" instead of
"no W+X pages found".
Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|