Searched hist:"043 e127a126bb3ceb5fc753deee27d261fd0c5ce" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/qemu/docs/interop/ |
| H A D | vhost-user.rst | diff 043e127a126bb3ceb5fc753deee27d261fd0c5ce Mon Feb 19 08:34:19 CST 2024 Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com> hw/virtio: check owner for removing objects
Shared objects lack spoofing protection.
For VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE messages
received by the vhost-user interface, any backend was
allowed to remove entries from the shared table just
by knowing the UUID. Only the owner of the entry
shall be allowed to removed their resources
from the table.
To fix that, add a check for all
*SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE messages received.
A vhost device can only remove TYPE_VHOST_DEV
entries that are owned by them, otherwise skip
the removal, and inform the device that the entry
has not been removed in the answer.
Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240219143423.272012-2-aesteve@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/qemu/hw/virtio/ |
| H A D | vhost-user.c | diff eea5aeef84e1b74f515b474d3a86377701f93750 Tue Oct 22 07:46:14 CDT 2024 Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com> vhost-user: fix shared object return values
VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_ADD and
VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE state
in the spec that they return 0 for successful
operations, non-zero otherwise. However,
implementation relies on the return types
of the virtio-dmabuf library, with opposite
semantics (true if everything is correct,
false otherwise). Therefore, current
implementation violates the specification.
Revert the logic so that the implementation
of the vhost-user handling methods matches
the specification.
Fixes: 043e127a126bb3ceb5fc753deee27d261fd0c5ce
Fixes: 160947666276c5b7f6bca4d746bcac2966635d79
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20241022124615.585596-1-aesteve@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
diff 043e127a126bb3ceb5fc753deee27d261fd0c5ce Mon Feb 19 08:34:19 CST 2024 Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com> hw/virtio: check owner for removing objects
Shared objects lack spoofing protection.
For VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE messages
received by the vhost-user interface, any backend was
allowed to remove entries from the shared table just
by knowing the UUID. Only the owner of the entry
shall be allowed to removed their resources
from the table.
To fix that, add a check for all
*SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE messages received.
A vhost device can only remove TYPE_VHOST_DEV
entries that are owned by them, otherwise skip
the removal, and inform the device that the entry
has not been removed in the answer.
Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240219143423.272012-2-aesteve@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|