Searched refs:relative_throughput (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
35 unsigned int relative_throughput; member97 pi->relative_throughput); in st_status()101 pi->relative_throughput); in st_status()118 unsigned int relative_throughput = 1; in st_add_path() local164 pi->relative_throughput = relative_throughput; in st_add_path()226 if (pi1->relative_throughput == pi2->relative_throughput) in st_compare_load()234 !pi1->relative_throughput || !pi2->relative_throughput) in st_compare_load()235 return pi2->relative_throughput - pi1->relative_throughput; in st_compare_load()266 st1 = sz1 * pi2->relative_throughput; in st_compare_load()267 st2 = sz2 * pi1->relative_throughput; in st_compare_load()[all …]
18 [<repeat_count> [<relative_throughput>]]24 <relative_throughput>:34 <status> <fail-count> <in-flight-size> <relative_throughput>41 <relative_throughput>:59 1. If the paths have the same 'relative_throughput', skip63 and just compare the 'relative_throughput'.65 3. If some paths have non-zero 'relative_throughput' and others66 have zero 'relative_throughput', ignore those paths with zero67 'relative_throughput'.72 'relative_throughput' may be better. So compare 'relative_throughput'[all …]